Statistics from Altmetric.com
We present a 70-year-old woman who was diagnosed 5 years ago with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome on the basis of her clinical picture (episodes of fever, urticarial and maculopapular rash, myalgia, arthralgia and/or arthritis, especially after cold exposure), and genetic testing which confirmed an NLRP3 missense mutation. Since then she has been treated with anti-interleukin-1 subcutaneous therapy (initially on anakinra daily and subsequently on canakinumab 150 mg every 8 weeks). This treatment resulted in complete resolution of disease signs and symptoms. On 15 March 2020 she received her last canakinumab injection. Ten days later she experienced low-grade fever (37.5ºC) and malaise. Her friend, with whom she was exercising, was diagnosed with COVID-19. The following day the patient was tested for SARS-COV-2 and she was found positive. At that time her white cell counts were 4,28x109/L (polymorphonuclear leucocytes 48%, lymphocytes 32%) and serum C-reactive protein was 9 mg/dL (normal value (nv) <5 mg/dL). In a couple of days her symptoms resolved and repeated testing for SARS-COV-2, 12 days later, was negative.
Based on the patient’s age and immunomodulation due to the interleukin-1 blockade, she would be classified as high risk for developing a serious COVID-19 infection. However, the patient’s clinical picture was very mild.
The question which arises from this and other recently presented cases of patients with autoimmune disorders treated with biological or targeted disease-modifying agents1 2 is, whether cytokine blockade may protect patients for a cytokine storm and thus ameliorate the gravity of the clinical picture of their COVID-19 infection.
Definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from a limited number of cases; however, the presentation of this case intends to fuel a fruitful discussion on this issue.
Handling editor Josef S Smolen
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.