Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Response to ‘Decision making value of nuclear dense fine speckled pattern in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease: trick or treat?’ by Deng et al
Free
  1. Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade1,
  2. Jan Damoiseaux2,
  3. Edward K Chan3
  1. 1 Rheumatology Division, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  2. 2 Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  3. 3 Department of Oral Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jan Damoiseaux, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6229 HX, Netherlands; jan.damoiseaux{at}mumc.nl

Statistics from Altmetric.com

The correspondence of Deng et al 1 raises practical issues regarding the recognition and clinical interpretation of the nuclear dense fine speckled (DFS, AC-2) pattern in a typical clinical immunology laboratory during antinuclear antibody (ANA) screening using indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IIFA). Based on the recommendation of the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP),2 the recognition of a nuclear DFS pattern is not to be taken as the same as the determination of an anti-DFS70 antibody using a follow-up specific immunoassay. In fact, HEp-2 IIFA is a screening test for a vast array of autoantibodies and is not intended for the final determination of autoantibody specificity. Accordingly, the ICAP recommendation is clear that all HEp-2 IIFA patterns as defined by ICAP, with the sole exception of anti-centromere (AC-3), must be followed-up with specific immunoassays.2 With specific …

View Full Text

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles