Article Text

Download PDFPDF

3D culture of Erdheim-Chester disease tissues unveils histiocyte metabolism as a new therapeutic target
  1. Antonello Villa1,
  2. Daniela Belloni2,
  3. Barbara Vergani1,
  4. Simone Cenci3,
  5. Giulio Cavalli4,5,
  6. Riccardo Biavasco5,6,
  7. Monica Rodolfo7,
  8. Maria Giulia Cangi8,
  9. Claudio Doglioni5,8,
  10. Lorenzo Dagna4,5,
  11. Elisabetta Ferrero2,
  12. Marina Ferrarini2
  1. 1 Consorzio MIA, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
  2. 2 Division of Experimental Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  3. 3 Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  4. 4 Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  5. 5 Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
  6. 6 San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  7. 7 Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale per Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
  8. 8 Pathology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Marina Ferrarini, Division of Experimental Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan 20132, Italy; ferrarini.marina{at}hsr.it

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, characterised by tissue infiltration by foamy CD68+ CD1a histiocytes.1 The disease has pleomorphic clinical manifestations, including long bones and extraskeletal involvement, and may be life-threatening, particularly when heart and central nervous system are affected.1

ECD histiocytes secrete proinflammatory cytokines2 and carry activating mutations along the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK protein kinase signalling pathway, most commonly the BRAFV600E oncogenic mutation.3 4 Accordingly, patients with ECD have been treated with cytokine inhibitors, including infliximab,1 ,5 and, more recently, with the BRAFV600E inhibitor vemurafenib.6 The latter, however, induces sustained but partial clinical responses and recurrences on discontinuation,6 underlining the need for more effective therapeutic strategies.

To identify the outcomes downstream constitutive ERK phosphorylation in ECD histiocytes and their response to small molecule-based inhibition, we performed three-dimensional (3D) culture of tissues from three BRAFV600E-mutated ECD patients in the RCCS bioreactor7 (and online supplementary methods) in the presence/absence of vemurafenib or infliximab, used as control.

All patient samples maintained production of prototypical cytokines and chemokines2 in bioreactor, thus validating this technology also for ECD; moreover, infliximab, and, to a lesser degree, vemurafenib, significantly decreased cyto-chemokines and soluble tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor (sTNF-R) levels (figure 1A), remarkably mirroring the downmodulation reported in treated patients5 (and data not shown).

Figure 1

Vemurafenib treatment affects glycolytic metabolism in Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) tissues cultured in bioreactor. (A) Tissues from three patients with ECD were cultured in bioreactor in the absence (black bars) or presence of either the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor infliximab (10 µg/mL, grey bars) or the BRAFV600E inhibitor vemurafenib (6 µM, white bars). Concentrations of cytokines, chemokines and soluble TNF receptors (sTNF-R) I and II (the latter bona fide expression of TNF activity5) were determined in day 2 culture supernatants by Bio-Plex Multiplex Cytokine assay and ELISA assay, respectively. Data are means±SD of triplicate values. (B) ECD pleural fragments from patient 3 were cultured in the presence/absence of vemurafenib (vem, 6 µM). Samples were then retrieved at day 2 (a–e, a1–e1) and day 6 (f, f1), fixed and submitted to immunohistochemistry (IHC). Bars represent 500 and 100 µm. (C) Glucose (upper) and lactate (lower) concentrations were determined in the supernatants from ECD tissues in bioreactor in the presence/absence of vemurafenib (vem, 6 µM) and from normal skin samples as a control. Data are means±SD of triplicate values. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test. *P≤0.05; **P≤0.01; ***P≤0.001. Casp-3, caspase-3; NT, untreated; p-ERK, phospho-ERK; TCM, tissue culture medium.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) on ECD tissues in bioreactor showed preserved viability, histoarchitecture and expression of histiocyte lineage and activation markers (figure 1B) for up to 6 days. Vemurafenib specifically targeted mutated ECD histiocytes, as demonstrated by decreased ERK phosphorylation, without affecting viability or persistence of CD68+ cells (figure 1B and online supplementary figure S1). Conversely, the drug decreased TNF-α production (figure 1B, f, f1) paralleling the significantly reduced cytokine release in supernatants (figure 1A).

Cancer metabolism has gained renewed and growing interest, being reprogrammed glucose metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis and increased lactate production the best characterised metabolic phenotype.8 Oncogenic BRAF affects glucose metabolism by multiple mechanisms, including upregulation of the glucose transporter Glut-1.8 Glut-1 is also upregulated by hypoxia and inflammation in rheumatic and cardiovascular diseases.9 Accordingly, a fraction of CD68+ ECD histiocytes expressed Glut-1, as shown by IHC (online supplementary figure S2A,B) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (online supplementary figure S2C), and retained its expression in culture in bioreactor (figure 1B,d). Given the unique opportunity to assess tissue metabolism through metabolite determination in bioreactor supernatants, we determined lactate levels, which were increased, compared with basal levels and normal skin samples (figure 1C). Notably, vemurafenib downmodulated both Glut-1 expression (figure 1B,d1) and lactate production (figure 1C).

Altogether, we here demonstrate, as a proof of concept, that the bioreactor technology allows investigating ECD pathophysiology and response to drugs, thus overcoming the lack of cell lines and suitable animal models. Significantly, upregulated Glut-1 expression and lactate production, and its reversal on vemurafenib treatment, delineate aerobic glycolysis as a novel BRAF-driven feature of ECD histiocytes. Since Glut-1 is the transporter for the radiotracer of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET), these data may provide the molecular basis for the well-known efficacy of the technique in monitoring response to therapy in ECD.1

Although not proliferating,2 ECD histiocytes may experience increased energy requirement for the production of immune mediators, as for inflammatory macrophages. In bioreactor, vemurafenib decreased their cytokine/chemokine release, conceivably because of impaired metabolism, but not their viability, at variance with other BRAF-mutated tumours. The outcome of vemurafenib treatment in ECD histiocytes may depend on the activation of adaptive responses to energy deprivation, including autophagy, or, conversely, on detrimental features (hypoxia, acidosis, limited nutrients availability) of the native microenvironment, possibly overcome by our culture conditions in bioreactor.7

Further exploitation of the 3D culture system is needed to identify and harness metabolic signalling and supporting adaptive responses in mutated histiocytes, in the perspective of designing new therapeutic strategies for patients with ECD.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Licia Rivoltini and Giovanna Musco for critical support and advices, and Mauro Motta, Marta Strollo and Silvia Heltai for technical assistance. The authors also thank Kathy Brewer and the ECD Global Alliance (DeRidder, LA) for their unceasing support.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • LD, EF and MF contributed equally.

  • Handling editor Josef Smolen

  • Contributors AV, EF and MF designed the study. DB and BV performed the experiments and collected the data. CD reviewed the histological samples. MR provided experimental tools. MGC determined the BRAF status. DB conducted the statistical analysis. AV, SC, GC, RB, EF and MF analysed and interpreted the data. GC collected clinical information. LD diagnosed and followed patients with ECD and contributed to discussion. AV, EF and MF wrote the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded by the ECD Global Alliance and by the Italian Ministry of Health (grant number GR-2009-1594586).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.