Article Text

Download PDFPDF
‘Slope sign’: a feature of large vessel vasculitis?
  1. Bhaskar Dasgupta1,
  2. Kate Smith1,2,
  3. Abdullah Abu Syeed Khan1,
  4. Fiona Coath1,
  5. Richard J Wakefield3
  1. 1 Rheumatology, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea, UK
  2. 2 Rheumatology, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
  3. 3 Rheumatology, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta, Rheumatology, Southend Hospital NHS Trust, Westcliff-on-Sea SS0 0RY, UK; bhaskar.dasgupta{at}southend.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Ultrasound (US) scanning in the diagnosis of large vessel giant cell arteritis (LV-GCA) is becoming more prevalent, with the advantage of being non-invasive and free of ionising radiation.1 The recent European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations suggest that US should be the first-line investigation for cases of suspected GCA where adequate equipment and expertise is available.2 3 US is also having a more prominent role in disease monitoring. Biologics such as Tocilizumab have now been approved to treat relapsing and refractory LV-GCA; however, it has been noted that while Tocilizumab may suppress serum inflammatory markers (ie, C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) it may underestimate on-going vessel wall disease activity.4 Consequently, the use of US …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Josef S Smolen

  • Contributors BD performed the scans; BD, AASK and KS selected the scans, BD, AASK, KS, FC and RJW contributed to data analysis and writing the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.