Article Text

Download PDFPDF

FRI0583 Clinical utility of ana-elia vs ana-immunofluorescence in connective tissue disease
Free
  1. O. Alsaed1,
  2. L. Alamilah1,
  3. O. Al-Radideh2,
  4. M. Elkhalifa3,
  5. A.-W. Al-Allaf1
  1. 1Medicine/Rheumatology
  2. 2Internal Medicine
  3. 3laboratory medicine and pathology, Hamad Medical corporation, Doha, Qatar

Abstract

Background Antinuclear antibody (ANA) detection by indirect immunofluorescence technique (ANA-IIF) is the standard test for connective tissue disease (CTD) screening for last 5 decades, which has low specificity and it is labour intensive. ANA detection by fluoroenzyme immunoassay (ANA-Elia) has been developed recently as an alternative method to include 17 ANA-targeted recombinant antigens.

Objectives Compare the sensitivity and specificity of the new ANA-Elia with conventional ANA-IIF.

Methods Randomly selected 1458 patient’s sera from primary and secondary health care were tested for both the standard ANA-IIF (Diasorin S.P.A, saluggia, Italy) and the new ANA-Elia (Phadia GMbH, Ferieiburg, Germany). ANA-Elia is fluoroenzyme immunoassay performed on the Phadia-250 automated platform. It contains 17 ANA-targeted recombinant antigens; dsDNA, Sm-D, Rib-P, PCNA, U1-RNP (70, A, C), SS-A/Ro (52 and 60), SS-B/La, Centromere B, Scl-70, Fibrillarin, RNA Polymerase III, Jo-1, Mi-2, and PMscl. Result with ratio >1.0 considered positive for the new technique. For ANA-IIF our lab cut off for positive test is ≥1:80. Patients were evaluated in our rheumatology clinic for fulfilling the correspondent international clinical criteria for various connective tissue diseases.

Results 75.7% were females with mean age of 43±13 years. 201 (11.5%) patients confirmed to have clinical CTD as follow: 142 SLE, 24 Sjogren’s syndrome, 15 scleroderma, 7 MCT, 10 Myositis and 10 undifferentiated CTD. The specificity of ANA-Elia at cut off ratio of >1 and ANA-IIF at titer of ≥1:80 was almost equal, 88.5% and 87.6% respectively. However, ANA-Elia has higher sensitivity (74.5%) as compared to ANA-IIF (61.6%). At a higher cut off ratio of >2 and titer of ≥1:160, the specificity improved to 93.6%–92.6% respectively.

Conclusions The ANA testing with the newly developed, use friendly, fully automated and less labour intense method of ANA-Elia can replace the standard conventional ANA-IIF with better specificity.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.