Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P007 In ra, becoming seronegative over the 1st year of dmard treatment does not translate to better chances of drug-free remission in the long-term
  1. EC De Moel1,
  2. VF Derksen1,
  3. LA Trouw1,
  4. H Bang2,
  5. YP Goekoop-Ruiterman3,
  6. GM Steup-Beekman1,
  7. TW Huizinga1,
  8. CF Allaart1,
  9. RE Toes1,
  10. D van der Woude1
  1. 1Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
  2. 2Orgentec Diagnostika, Mainz, Germany
  3. 3Rheumatology, Haga Hospital, the Hague, Netherlands


Introduction Patients with RA harbour autoantibodies of various isotypes and directed against several post-translational modifications. Baseline seropositivity is a poor prognostic factor for sustained drug-free remission (SDFR). However, autoantibody levels may change and patients may become seronegative under treatment. It is unknown how often this happens, and whether decreasing levels or becoming seronegative early in disease, indicating disappearance of serological autoimmunity, improves chances of SDFR.

Objectives To longitudinally characterise the levels and presence of autoantibodies in RA patients and to investigate whether changes in these levels and/or presence associates with SDFR.

Methods In sera of 399 seropositive RA patients in the IMPROVED study,1 we measured, at 4 month intervals over the first year of treatment: IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 (anti-CCP2) and anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP), IgM and IgA for rheumatoid factor (RF), and IgG autoantibodies against 4 citrullinated and 2 acetylated peptides. We investigated whether changes in antibody levels and seroconversion from positive to negative for each individual antibody was favourable for SDFR (drug-free DAS44 <1.6 lasting≥1 year until last follow-up).

Results For all 14 antibodies, median levels decreased significantly between baseline and 4 months and then stabilised. Most seroconversion to negative happened within the first 4 months of treatment (with prednisone and methotrexate), after which some patients converted back to seropositive. The prevalence of seroconversion varied substantially depending on the autoantibody. The percentage of baseline autoantibody positive patients that became seronegative by 12 months was: anti-CCP2 IgG (2%), IgM (29%), IgA (29%); RF IgM (21%), IgA (31%); anti-CarP IgG (51%), IgM (49%), IgA (66%); anti-acetylated-lysine-vimentin IgG (24%), anti-acetylated-ornithine-vimentin IgG (10%); anti-cit-vimentin 59–74 IgG (21%); anti-cit-fibrinogen α27–43 IgG (45%), anti-cit-fibrinogen β36–52 IgG (20%), and anti-cit-enolase 5–20 IgG (22%). We hypothesised that greater level decreases and seroconversion to negative, reflecting disappearance of the underlying immunopathology, might be favourable for the long-term outcome SDFR, but surprisingly, greater median decreases in levels were not associated with higher chance of SDFR for any antibody. Furthermore, we found no evidence that rates of SDFR were higher in patients who seroconverted to negative compared those who stayed seropositive, for any of the 14 antibodies analysed.

Conclusions Autoantibody levels decrease and seroconversion from positive to negative occurs under treatment, but these changes do not translate to apparent clinical long-term benefits with regard to SDFR. This suggests that the disappearance of measurable serological autoimmunity does not lead to eradication of disease.


  1. . Heimans. AR&T2016;18:23.

Disclosure of interest None declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.