Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Extended report
Risk of second malignant neoplasm and mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological DMARDs: a Danish population-based cohort study
  1. Lene Dreyer1,2,
  2. René L Cordtz1,2,
  3. Inger Marie J Hansen3,4,
  4. Lars Erik Kristensen2,
  5. Merete L Hetland5,6,7,
  6. Lene Mellemkjaer8
  1. 1 Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
  2. 2 Department of Rheumatology, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
  3. 3 Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  4. 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology OUH, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark
  5. 5 Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
  6. 6 Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  7. 7 DANBIO Registry, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
  8. 8 Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lene Dreyer, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup 2900, Denmark; lene.dreyer{at}regionh.dk

Abstract

Objective To study the risk of a second malignant neoplasm (SMN) and mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a history of a primary cancer diagnosis and treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD).

Methods Among patients with RA (n=15 286) registered in the DANBIO Register during 2000–2011, 1678 had a primary cancer according to the Danish Cancer Registry. HRs for SMN and death were calculated.

Results During follow-up there were 279 patients with RA contributing person-years to the bDMARDs use before their primary cancer diagnosis, 220 to the only after, 92 to the both before and after, while 1203 patients with RA contributed to the non-use strata. Ever use of bDMARDs was associated with a HR of 1.11 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.67) for developing a SMN compared with non-use (cancer site adjusted). The HR for death associated with bDMARD use before the primary cancer diagnosis was increased 1.53 (95% CI 1.13 to 2.09). After further adjustment for extent of the primary cancer, the HR for death was 1.20 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.63) for bDMARDs use before cancer, 1.36 (95% CI 0.78 to 2.39) for bDMARD use only after cancer and 1.22 (95% CI 0.70 to 2.13) for use both before and after the cancer.

Conclusions Among patients with RA with a history of cancer, treatment with bDMARDs was not associated with increased risk of SMN. No clear conclusion can be drawn regarding mortality in bDMARD-treated patients with RA.

  • anti-TNF
  • DMARDs (biologic)
  • arthritis
  • epidemiology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Tore K Kvien

  • Contributors LD: contributed to study idea, conception and design, literature search, data collection, the analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript and approving the final version. RC: contributed to the interpretation of data, references, revising the manuscript and approving the final version. IMJH: contributed to study conception and design, interpretation of data, revising the manuscript and approving the final version. LEK and MLH: contributed to interpretation of data, revising the manuscript and approving the final version. LM: contributed to study design, literature search, data collection, the analysis and interpretation of data, revising the manuscript and approving the final version.

  • Funding This study was supported by grants from the Danish Rheumatism Association, the Danish Cancer Society and the Danish Council for Independent Research.

  • Competing interests LD: have received speaking fees outside the submitted work from UCB, MSD and Janssen pharmaceutica; IMJ: Roche Pharmaceuticals; LEK: Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, UCB, Celgene, BMS, Biogen, Forward Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; MLH: AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Pfizer, Orion, Novartis, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Celltrion.

  • Ethics approval The project is entirely register based, and the patients have not been contacted. No approval by the ethical committees was needed according to Danish law. Approval by the Danish Data Protection Agency was obtained (HGH-2016-099, I-Suite no: 04979).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Presented at An abstract of this study was presented at the 2017 American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting.