Article Text

Extended report
Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus placebo surgery for a degenerative meniscus tear: a 2-year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial
  1. Raine Sihvonen1,
  2. Mika Paavola2,
  3. Antti Malmivaara3,
  4. Ari Itälä4,
  5. Antti Joukainen5,
  6. Heikki Nurmi6,
  7. Juha Kalske2,
  8. Anna Ikonen2,
  9. Timo Järvelä7,
  10. Tero A H Järvinen8,
  11. Kari Kanto1,
  12. Janne Karhunen2,
  13. Jani Knifsund4,
  14. Heikki Kröger5,
  15. Tommi Kääriäinen5,
  16. Janne Lehtinen1,
  17. Jukka Nyrhinen6,
  18. Juha Paloneva6,
  19. Outi Päiväniemi1,
  20. Marko Raivio1,
  21. Janne Sahlman5,
  22. Roope Sarvilinna2,
  23. Sikri Tukiainen2,
  24. Ville-Valtteri Välimäki2,
  25. Ville Äärimaa4,
  26. Pirjo Toivonen9,
  27. Teppo L N Järvinen9
  28. The FIDELITY (Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study) Investigators
  1. 1 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hatanpää Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  2. 2 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3 Center for Health and Social Economics, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  4. 4 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  5. 5 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
  6. 6 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
  7. 7 Arthroscopic and Sports Medicine Center Pohjola Sairaala, Helsinki, Finland
  8. 8 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
  9. 9 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University, Töölö Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  1. Correspondence to Professor Teppo L N Järvinen, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Töölö Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, Helsinki 00260, Finland; teppo.jarvinen{at}


Objective To assess if arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) is superior to placebo surgery in the treatment of patients with degenerative tear of the medial meniscus.

Methods In this multicentre, randomised, participant-blinded and outcome assessor-blinded, placebo-surgery controlled trial, 146 adults, aged 35–65 years, with knee symptoms consistent with degenerative medial meniscus tear and no knee osteoarthritis were randomised to APM or placebo surgery. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the change from baseline in the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) and Lysholm knee scores and knee pain after exercise at 24 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of unblinding of the treatment-group allocation, participants' satisfaction, impression of change, return to normal activities, the incidence of serious adverse events and the presence of meniscal symptoms in clinical examination. Two subgroup analyses, assessing the outcome on those with mechanical symptoms and those with unstable meniscus tears, were also carried out.

Results In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant between-group differences in the mean changes from baseline to 24 months in WOMET score: 27.3 in the APM group as compared with 31.6 in the placebo-surgery group (between-group difference, −4.3; 95% CI, −11.3 to 2.6); Lysholm knee score: 23.1 and 26.3, respectively (−3.2; −8.9 to 2.4) or knee pain after exercise, 3.5 and 3.9, respectively (−0.4; −1.3 to 0.5). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the secondary outcomes or within the analysed subgroups.

Conclusions In this 2-year follow-up of patients without knee osteoarthritis but with symptoms of a degenerative medial meniscus tear, the outcomes after APM were no better than those after placebo surgery. No evidence could be found to support the prevailing ideas that patients with presence of mechanical symptoms or certain meniscus tear characteristics or those who have failed initial conservative treatment are more likely to benefit from APM.

  • knee osteoarthritis
  • orthopaedic surgery
  • treatment

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

View Full Text

Statistics from

Supplementary materials

  • Lay summary

    Disclaimer : This is a summary of a scientific article written by a medical professional (“the Original Article”). The Summary is written to assist non medically trained readers to understand general points of the Original Article. It is supplied “as is” without any warranty. You should note that the Original Article (and Summary) may not be fully relevant nor accurate as medical science is constantly changing and errors can occur. It is therefore very important that readers not rely on the content in the Summary and consult their medical professionals for all aspects of their health care and only rely on the Summary if directed to do so by their medical professional. Please view our full Website Terms and Conditions.
    Copyright © 2018 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism. Medical professionals may print copies for their and their patients and students non commercial use. Other individuals may print a single copy for their personal, non commercial use. For other uses please contact our Rights and Licensing Team.


  • Contributors The Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY) trial (patient enrolment and execution of follow-up assessments in 2007–2015) is carried out by the FIDELITY Investigators. Conception and design: RS, MP, AM and TLNJ. Analysis and interpretation of the data: RS and TLNJ. Drafting of the article: RS and TLNJ. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content and final approval: all authors. Ensuring the accuracy of the work: RS and TLNJ. Obtaining of funding: TLNJ. All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Funding This study was supported by the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the State funding for university-level health research (Tampere and Helsinki University Hospitals), the Social Insurance Institution of Finland (KELA) and the Academy of Finland. Dr Sihvonen is supported also by The Finnish Medical Foundation and Orion-Pharmos Research Foundation. The funding sources had no role in in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

  • Competing interests All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Given that the informed consent forms of the Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study trial did not include a provision for data sharing (trial launched in 2007), the full dataset cannot be shared due to a potential breach of the Finnish Personal Data Act. Scientists with a specific question regarding the trial data are encouraged to contact the corresponding author (TLNJ).

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles