Aims The EuroMyositis Registry facilitates collaboration across the idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) research community. This inaugural report examines pooled Registry data.
Methods Cross-sectional analysis of IIM cases from 11 countries was performed. Associations between clinical subtypes, extramuscular involvement, environmental exposures and medications were investigated.
Results Of 3067 IIM cases, 69% were female. The most common IIM subtype was dermatomyositis (DM) (31%). Smoking was more frequent in connective tissue disease overlap cases (45%, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.90, p=0.012). Smoking was associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.65, p=0.013), dysphagia (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.77, p=0.001), malignancy ever (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.33, p<0.001) and cardiac involvement (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.60, p<0.001).
Dysphagia occurred in 39% and cardiac involvement in 9%; either occurrence was associated with higher Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.23, p<0.001). HAQ scores were also higher in inclusion body myositis cases (adjusted OR 3.85, 95% CI 2.52 to 5.90, p<0.001). Malignancy (ever) occurred in 13%, most commonly in DM (20%, OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.57, p<0.001).
ILD occurred in 30%, most frequently in antisynthetase syndrome (71%, OR 10.7, 95% CI 8.6 to 13.4, p<0.001). Rash characteristics differed between adult-onset and juvenile-onset DM cases (‘V’ sign: 56% DM vs 16% juvenile-DM, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36, p<0.001). Glucocorticoids were used in 98% of cases, methotrexate in 71% and azathioprine in 51%.
Conclusion This large multicentre cohort demonstrates the importance of extramuscular involvement in patients with IIM, its association with smoking and its influence on disease severity. Our findings emphasise that IIM is a multisystem inflammatory disease and will help inform prognosis and clinical management of patients.
- Disease registries
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), or ‘myositis spectrum disorders’, are a rare and heterogeneous group of multisystem autoimmune diseases. IIM traditionally encompasses polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Inclusion body myositis (IBM) has become recognised as an entity distinct from PM, identified by a characteristic distribution of muscle weakness and treatment-resistant course. Additionally, skeletal muscle inflammation can occur in the context of other connective tissue diseases (CTDs), termed CTD-overlap myositis. Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) and the antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) are also now recognised as distinct entities under the IIM umbrella.1 The importance of serotype in predicting clinical features and prognosis is becoming increasingly recognised.2
Estimates of the prevalence of IIM vary widely from 0.55 to 17.50 per 1 00 000 people.3 The rarity and heterogeneity of IIM has hampered research efforts and impeded the delivery of large-scale interventional clinical trials.4 Consequently, the therapeutic evidence-base in IIM is remarkably limited.5 6 Recently, several IIM research databases and registries have been created to pool resources and expertise, facilitating completion of several international IIM research studies.7–11
We describe the data held within EuroMyositis, the largest IIM disease registry, highlighting the differing clinical characteristics of each IIM diagnostic subtype and analyse associations with extramuscular involvement, malignancy, environmental exposures and disease severity.
The EuroMyositis Registry
Anonymised downloads from those agreeing to participate (Belgium, China, Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK and Vietnam) were obtained on 15 August 2016, including 92% (3487/3790) of all cases in the Registry. During data processing, 420 cases were excluded from further analysis; for 317 cases, confirmation of diagnosis was not available, for 55 cases, conflicting data entries were identified and the remaining 48 cases had rare IIM subtypes (see online supplementary appendix B). A total of 3067 cases (81% of the whole Registry) were included in the final analysis.
Analysed sections of the Registry included demographics, clinical features and environmental/lifestyle exposures, including smoking and toxins (asbestos, silica, fibreglass, solvents and coal dust). Where available (64%, 1951/3067), the autoantibody profile for each case was obtained to facilitate accurate diagnostic subtype classification. Specific analysis of the associations between serotype and phenotype will be the subject of a separate publication. Disease severity assessments made using the International Myositis Assessment & Clinical Studies Group Core Set Measures ‘disease activity’ and ‘disease damage’ toolkits12 were obtained where available, as were records of any medications prescribed for IIM treatment. Longitudinal data were available for some cases (19%, 596/3067), although we limited this report to cross-sectional analysis using information from the last recorded patient visit.
Investigators at each site initially determined the diagnostic subtype for each case according to the criteria employed by the Registry (see online supplementary appendix B). In addition, rather than retain traditional subtype designation of cases as either PM, DM or JDM, and given the growing consensus that the different IIM subtypes, particularly ASS and IMNM have distinct clinical, pathological and serological characteristics,13–16 we performed a process of retrospective subtype reclassification using the data available in the Registry at the time of study.
PM, DM and JDM cases met Bohan and Peter ‘definite’ or ‘probable’ diagnostic criteria.17 18 The Registry specifies that these criteria should only be applied (and thus permit inclusion of the patient in the Registry as a PM, DM or JDM case), if known infectious, toxic, metabolic, dystrophic or endocrine myopathies have been excluded by appropriate evaluations and that no exclusion criteria are met (see online supplementary appendix B). IBM cases met either the Medical Research Council, Griggs et al or European Neuromuscular Centre diagnostic criteria.19–21
Those with suspected PM, DM or JDM, who did not fulfil these criteria were classified as ‘unspecified myositis’ and excluded from further analysis, unless they met the criteria for ASS (in which case they were analysed within the ASS group, see below) or had myositis overlapping with a CTD (in which case they were analysed with the CTD-overlap myositis group). CTD-overlap myositis was defined as PM, DM, JDM or unspecified myositis coexisting with a CTD that met relevant diagnostic criteria.22–26 This report uses the term JDM for current adults with juvenile-onset (<18 years) disease. Six cases of ‘juvenile PM’ were excluded from further analysis due to the rarity of this diagnostic entity and the difficulty in drawing conclusions from such a small sample.
For the purposes of this report, we pooled those with ASS (including where felt to be occurring in association with another IIM diagnostic subtype) into a single category by applying criteria proposed by Connors et al.27 This included retrospective reclassification of those with PM, DM, JDM or CTD-overlap myositis cases as having ASS if they possessed an antisynthetase autoantibody (anti-Jo1, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-EJ, anti-OJ, anti-KS or anti-Zo autoantibodies), where results of these were available. These were combined with cases where the recruiting clinician deemed that criteria for ASS were met at the time of recruitment (see online supplementary appendix B). We also reclassified those with ‘unspecified myositis’ and amyopathic DM28 as ASS if they possessed an antisynthetase antibody and had coexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD), Raynaud’s phenomenon, arthritis or mechanics’ hands. Remaining cases with clinically amyopathic DM were analysed as part of the DM group (n=38). We excluded a small number of cases where conflicting data were identified. This included 28 patients with PM, IMNM and IBM that had the presence of a DM-specific rash recorded and 27 patients with DM where the presence of a DM-specific rash could not be confirmed.
The Registry categorises statin-related myotoxicity (SRM) cases using definitions suggested by Alfirevic et al (SRM1–6).29 We reclassified as IMNM any case with statin-associated IMNM (SRM6) or SRM occurring in association with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) autoantibodies. Remaining cases with SRM1-5 were excluded from further analysis (n=16). We also reclassified as IMNM any case of PM that had anti-SRP or anti-HMGCR autoantibodies. All diagnostic subtype classifications were applied in a mutually exclusive manner (ie, cases could not be assigned to two IIM subtype groups). A summary of all diagnostic reclassifications is shown in online supplementary appendix B.
Malignancy is recorded in the EuroMyositis Registry regardless of the relationship to the diagnosis of IIM. We assigned cases a label of ‘cancer-associated myositis’ (CAM), where malignancy was diagnosed within 3 years of IIM diagnosis.30 31 Smoking was defined as having ever smoked at least one cigarette per day for more than 1 year. Cardiac involvement was defined as the occurrence of pericarditis, myocarditis, arrhythmia or sinus tachycardia occurring due to the IIM disease process. ILD was defined by chest X-ray or CT, and abnormal pulmonary function tests, and occurring as part of the IIM disease process. Disease onset was the date of onset of the first symptoms of IIM. Environmental toxin exposure refers to prior exposure to any of asbestos, silica, fibreglass, solvents or coal dust. Further details of the definitions used by the EuroMyositis Registry are contained in online supplementary appendix A.
Downloaded data were imported into STATA for Windows V.13.0 (College Station, Texas, USA) for processing. Cross-sectional descriptive statistical analysis was performed. For continuous variables, normally distributed data were summarised by calculation of means and SD. Non-normally distributed data were summarised using medians and IQR. Associations were assessed using logistic regression and expressed as OR and 95% CI. This was performed unadjusted, except with regard to analysis of disease activity data from the last patient visit, which was adjusted for disease duration. Kaplan-Meier analysis and proportional hazards regression was used to analyse differences in the interval between disease onset and diagnosis. In this case, the HR is presented to indicate the likelihood of a diagnosis being made over time. Where frequencies are presented, the denominator may vary between different variables because of missing data. No imputation was performed and only complete cases for each variable were analysed. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Data regarding 3067 cases from 11 countries were analysed. The most common diagnoses were DM (31%, 949/3067), PM (27%, 813/3067) and ASS (17%, 512/3067) (table 1). Of those with CTD-overlap myositis, systemic sclerosis (SSc) was the most common coexisting CTD (39%, 141/358). Most cases were Caucasian (80%, 2155/2681), and 69% (2058/3002) were female. Those with IBM were more likely to be male than those with other diagnostic subtypes (61% (142/233) IBM vs 29% (802/2769) for remainder, OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.91 to 5.04, p<0.001).
The mean age at IIM diagnosis was 51 years (SD 17) (table 1). IBM cases (mean age at diagnosis 65 years, SD 10) and IMNM cases (mean age at diagnosis 57 years, SD 15) were older at time of diagnosis when compared with the remainder of the adult-onset myositis cohort (IBM: p<0.001; IMNM: p=0.003). The overall median interval between disease onset and IIM diagnosis was 8 months (IQR 3–22, n=1668). This was significantly longer for IBM cases (median 41 months (IQR 24–72), HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.44, p<0.001) and significantly shorter for DM, ASS and IMNM cases (DM: median 5 months (IQR 2–11), HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.90, p<0.001; ASS: median 7 months (IQR 3–13), HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.44, p<0.001; IMNM: median 7 (IQR 4–12), HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.61, p=0.037) when compared with the remainder of the cohort.
Heliotrope rash and Gottron’s papules/sign were observed in similar proportions in those with DM and JDM. However, the shawl and ‘V’ signs were less common in those with JDM (shawl sign: 45% (234/522) of DM vs 15% (6/40) of JDM, OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.53, p=0.001; ‘V’ sign: 56% (308/554) of DM vs 16% (7/43) of JDM, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.36, p<0.001). Calcinosis occurred in 6% (78/1314) of cases overall but was more common in those with JDM (44% (23/52) of JDM vs 4% (55/1262), OR 17.4, 95% CI 9.45 to 32.04, p<0.001) and CTD-overlap myositis (10% (16/165) of CTD-overlap vs 5% (62/1149), OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.35, p=0.031) when compared with the remainder of the cohort. Of the ASS cases, 90% (439/487) had myopathic muscle weakness, 71% (357/502) ILD, 51% (198/385) Raynaud’s phenomenon, 50% (238/472) arthritis and 38% (146/380) mechanics’ hands.
Overall, 37% (611/1646) of cases were smokers (table 2). Smoking was more common in CTD-overlap myositis cases compared with the remainder of the cohort (45% (103/231) vs 36% (508/1415), OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.90, p=0.012). Prior exposure to environmental toxins was observed more frequently in those with IBM (28% (21/75) vs 16% (136/855), OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.52, p=0.008). Environmental toxin exposure was also more common in smokers, compared with those that had never smoked (26% (71/273) vs 13% (73/571), OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.66 to 3.46, p<0.001).
Disease activity and disease damage assessments
At the last patient visit, lower manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8) scores (adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.98, p<0.001) and higher Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores (adjusted OR 3.85, 95% CI 2.52 to 5.90, p<0.001) were observed in those with IBM compared with the remainder of the cohort (table 2). IBM cases also had a higher Myositis Damage Index (MDI) global VAS compared with the remainder of the cohort (median 47 (IQR 39–62) vs 19 (IQR 5–36), adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.07, p<0.001).
Cases with ASS had a higher MMT-8 score at the last patient visit compared with the remainder of the cohort (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05, p=0.019). Cases with DM, JDM and ASS had lower HAQ-DI scores compared with the remainder of the cohort (DM: adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.91, p=0.004. JDM: adjusted OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.47, p=0.004. ASS: adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.93, p=0.011).
Extramuscular involvement and malignancy
Interstitial lung disease
Overall, 30% (720/2442) of cases had ILD (table 2), observed most frequently in those with ASS (71% (357/502) vs 19% in remainder of cohort (363/1940), OR 10.7, 95% CI 8.6 to 13.4, p<0.001). ILD was least frequent in those with IBM (3%, 7/218) and JDM (6%, 4/72). In cases with ILD, current or previous smoking and prior exposure to environmental toxins were observed more frequently than in those without ILD (smoking: 41% (191/462) vs 35% (387/1114), OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.65, p=0.013; toxin exposure: 22% (57/256) vs 14% (93/651), OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.48, p=0.004) (table 3). At their last visit, cases with ILD had a higher extramuscular disease activity VAS (median 10 (IQR 2–22) vs 3 (IQR 0–15), adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03, p=0.001) and MDI global VAS (median 25 (IQR 13–40) vs 14 (IQR 4–37), adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.005) (table 3).
Nine per cent (156/1715) of cases had cardiac involvement (table 2). This was most frequently observed in those with CTD-overlap myositis (12%, 27/230). Overall, those with SSc were more likely to have cardiac involvement compared with those without SSc (18% (13/74) vs 9% (143/1641), OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.16, p=0.011). Cardiac involvement was less frequent in those with IBM compared with the remainder of the cohort (4% (8/185) vs 10% (148/1530), OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.87, p=0.020). Smoking was significantly more frequent in those with cardiac involvement compared with those without (55% (56/102) vs 34% (426/1265), OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.60, p<0.001) (table 3). Cardiac involvement was also associated with exposure to environmental toxins (27% (18/68) vs 14% (97/702), OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.01, p=0.006).
At the last patient visit, the presence of cardiac involvement was associated with a higher patient-completed global disease activity VAS (median 50 (IQR 31–66) vs 41 (12-59), adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p=0.007), HAQ-DI (median 1.00 (IQR 0.38–1.63) vs 0.67 (IQR 0.13–1.38), adjusted OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.12, p=0.012), extramuscular disease activity VAS (median 12 (3-25) vs 7 (0–19), adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p=0.017) and MDI global VAS (median 31 (IQR 12–48) vs 20 (IQR 5–38), adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p=0.047) (table 3).
Dysphagia was observed in 39% (767/1945) of cases and was more common in those with CTD-overlap myositis (53% (137/258), OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.47, p<0.001) (table 2). The presence of dysphagia was more frequent in those with SSc (67% (63/94), OR 3.31, 95% CI 2.13 to 5.14, p<0.001). The rate of dysphagia was also higher in those with IBM compared with the remainder of the cohort (50% (111/224), OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11, p=0.001).
Smoking was more frequent in those with dysphagia (42% (247/584) vs 34% in those without dysphagia (322/951), OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.77, p=0.001) (table 3). At the last patient visit, dysphagia was associated with a higher patient-completed global disease activity VAS (median 46 (IQR 17–65) vs 37 (IQR 10–53), adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.007), HAQ-DI (median 1.0 (IQR 0.25–1.63) vs 0.63 (IQR 0.13–1.13), adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.96, p<0.001), extramuscular global VAS (median 7 (IQR 0–21) vs 5 (IQR 0–16), adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03, p=0.003) and MDI global VAS (median 25 (IQR 10–43) vs 17 (IQR 3–32), adjusted OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03, p=0.001). The MMT-8 score was lower in those with dysphagia (median 71 (IQR 59–78) vs 73 (IQR 64–78), adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.99, p=0.044).
Malignancy occurred in 13% (374/2788) of cases (table 2). Breast cancer was the most frequently observed cancer subtype (affecting 19% of those with cancer (70/374)). DM cases had a higher frequency of malignancy (20% (166/841) vs 11% (208/1947) in non-DM cases, OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.57, p<0.001). No malignancy was recorded in cases with JDM. Of those with cancer, CAM was defined in 46% (132/287; onset dates missing for remaining 87). CAM was more common in those with DM compared with the remainder of the cohort (9% (72/795) vs 3% (60/1906), OR 3.06, 95% CI 2.01 to 4.36, p<0.001). In those with CAM, the median interval between IIM diagnosis and cancer diagnosis was 1 month (ie, cancer onset 1 month after IIM diagnosis, IQR −3 to +12 months) (figure 1).
Smoking was more frequent in those with malignancy (51% (133/263) vs 37% (472/1294), OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.33, p<0.001) (table 3). Those with malignancy were older at the time of IIM disease onset, compared with those without malignancy (57 (SD 14) vs 48 (SD 16) years, OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.05, p<0.001). The presence of malignancy was associated with a higher patient-completed global disease activity VAS (median 47 (IQR 24–64) vs 38 (IQR 10–55), adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.009), HAQ-DI (median 1.13 (IQR 0.63–1.63) vs 0.63 (IQR 0.13–1.38), adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.04, p<0.001) and MDI global VAS (median 37 (IQR 22–53) vs 17 (IQR 5–35), adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05, p<0.001) (table 3).
A total of 2613 instances of usage of medications to treat IIM were recorded in 1023 cases (table 4). Oral glucocorticoid usage was recorded in 98% (969/993) of cases. Higher proportions of intravenous immunoglobulin usage were evident for cases with JDM (25%, 12/49), IMNM (18%, 9/50) and IBM (17%, 8/47). Cases with ASS had the highest proportions with recorded usage of both cyclophosphamide (39%, 44/114) and rituximab (14%, 26/184).
When considering all forms of IIM, the preferred steroid sparing agents were methotrexate (71%, 500/704) and azathioprine (51%, 311/615). In those with ASS, usage rates of azathioprine and methotrexate were similar (60% (77/128) and 60% (76/127), respectively). A high proportion of IBM cases had medication usage recorded in the ‘other biologic’ category (48%, 14/29) relating to participation of Swedish patients with IBM in a clinical trial of anakinra.32
Using the large EuroMyositis Registry dataset, we have identified several important new associations, including the strong influence of extramuscular involvement (malignancy, cardiac involvement and dysphagia) on disease severity. This was demonstrated by higher disease activity and damage scores, including worse functional performance according to the HAQ-DI. We found that smoking and environmental toxin exposure was associated with the occurrence of extramuscular involvement (ILD, cardiac involvement, malignancy and dysphagia), although this observation may relate more to direct toxic effects rather than be related to the IIM disease process itself.
We have also used data from the Registry to confirm several previously described observations. This includes the link between malignancy and DM, the different demographic characteristics of those with IBM compared with other IIM diagnostic subtypes and the differing skin disease characteristics of DM and JDM. We also found that cases with CTD-overlap disease, especially those with SSc, were at increased risk of cardiac involvement and dysphagia. We have demonstrated a similar frequency of ILD27 and cardiac involvement33 in IIM as described in other sources in the literature. The frequency of malignancy we identified was towards the lower range of that reported.1
The literature described complex associations between environmental exposures and IIM. Smoking has been shown to interact with serotype (particularly anti-Jo1 autoantibody status) and genotype in IIM, and this may explain some of our findings.34 Additionally, several other environmental factors have been investigated, particularly ultraviolet light exposure, seasonal birth patterns and prior infections.35–37 Thus, while our observational data cannot imply a causative role for smoking or environmental toxin exposure in the development of extramuscular manifestations of IIM, it is possible that these environmental factors could be of pathogenic relevance.
Disease registries are increasingly facilitating large-scale observational studies in IIM. In the USA, the MYOVISION registry has recently reported on factors associated with a reduced health-related quality of life in IIM.38 Factors identified included a diagnosis of IBM and the presence of ILD. We demonstrated a significantly higher HAQ-DI score in those with IBM compared with those with other IIM diagnostic subtypes. However, we did not demonstrate similar findings with regard to the presence of ILD. This may be explained by the fact that our analysis was restricted to understanding differences between IIM subtypes, whereas the MYOVISION authors compared data for IIM cases against normative data from the general population and from rheumatoid arthritis cases.
Our analysis has several limitations, many of which are inherent to analysis of disease registries. We did not perform any data validation, including verification of diagnosis. Differing local practices, for example, local methods of detecting cardiac involvement or malignancy, may have influenced the way data were recorded at individual sites and the definition used in the registry for some features (eg, ILD) may not include use of gold standard diagnostic techniques. Most had only cross-sectional data recorded, meaning that the incidence of some clinical features might be underestimated. In other cases, reporting bias may mean that some reported frequencies are overestimates. Usage rates of certain sections of the Registry also varied between centres, making analysis difficult in some cases. Additionally, in some cases it is possible that the associations demonstrated might be influenced by confounders that we have not accounted for.
Data now comprising the Registry were first recorded as early as 1999 in some cases. At that time, IMNM had not been recognised as a specific IIM subtype, there were no available classification criteria for ASS and several antisynthetase antibodies were yet to be discovered. Despite our attempts to minimise inclusion of misdiagnosed cases, there remains the possibility that some cases, particularly those with PM, could have been misdiagnosed. We also highlight the fact that several alternative proposed diagnostic and classification criteria for IIM are available, use of which may have influenced the results. The complexity of IIM and the lack of consensus diagnostic criteria or definitions of each subtype remain a significant problem for patients, clinicians and researchers alike. Such issues are likely to improve after ratification of the forthcoming European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology IIM classification criteria.39
Further recruitment into the EuroMyositis Registry will increase our power to detect rarer associations and further elucidate rarer disease subtypes such as juvenile-PM. The steering committee welcomes applications for implementation in additional paediatric and adult centres (https://euromyositis.eu).
This publication was supported by researchers at the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Unit. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the (UK) National Health Service (NHS), the NIHR or the (UK) Department of Health.
Handling editor Tore K Kvien
Contributors HC and IL had the original idea for the manuscript. JBL analysed the data and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. Data used were contributed by the authors and those listed under Collaborators.
Funding This study was supported in part by: Association Francaise Contre Les Myopathies (AFM), The European Union Sixth Framework Programme (project AutoCure; LSH-018661), European Science Foundation (ESF) in the framework of the Research Networking Programme European Myositis Network (EUMYONET), The Swedish Research Council (K2014-52X-14045-14-3) and the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet; Myositis UK; Medical Research Council (MRC) UK grant MR/N003322/1; Arthritis Research UK (18474). The Czech cohort was supported by Project for Conceptual Development of Research Organization 00023728 from Ministry of Health in the Czech Republic.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Local ethical approval for each centre using the EuroMyositis Registry has been obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Collaborators Belgium: Sophie D’Hose (University Hospital, Ghent). China: Xin Lu and Xiaolan Tian (China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing). Czech Republic: Heřman Mann, Olga Kryštůfková, Lenka Pleštilová, Martin Klein, Tereza Barochová, Kateřina Kubínová (Institute of Rheumatology, Prague). Italy: Chiara Gelardi, Veronica Pedini, Paolo Cardinaletti. Mexico: Luis J Jara (Direction of Education and Research, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico La Raza, IMSS), Miguel A Saavedra (Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico La Raza, IMSS), Claudia V Cruz-Reyes (Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico La Raza, IMSS), Olga Vera-Lastra (Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico La Raza, IMSS), Lilia Andrade-Ortega (Servicio de Reumatologia, Centro Medico Nacional 20 de Noviembre ISSSTE), Gabriel Medrano-Ramírez (Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General de Mexico, Secretaria de Salud), Minoru Satoh (University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan), Mario Salazar-Páramo (División de Investigación, CMNO, IMSS, Guadalajara, Jalisco), Eduardo Gomez-Bañuelos (Servicio de Reumatologia 004086, Hospital Civil Dr Juan I Menchaca, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco), Jorge Aguilar-Arreola (Servicio de Reumatologia 004086, Hospital Civil Dr Juan I Menchaca, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco), Sergio Durán-Barragán (Servicio de Reumatologia 004086, Hospital Civil Dr Juan I Menchaca, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco), Rosa Elena Navarro-Hernandez (Instituto de Investigación en Reumatología y del Sistema Músculo Esquelético, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara), Marcelo H Petri, (Instituto de Investigación en Reumatología y del Sistema Músculo Esquelético, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco). Norway: Øyvind Molberg (Oslo University Hospital, Oslo). Sweden : Maryam Dastmalchi, Antonella Notarnicola, Karina Gheorghe (all Rheumatology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet), Johan Rönnelid, Maria Liden (both Uppsala University, Uppsala), Balsam Hanna, (Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg), Awat Jalal (Örebro Hospital), Helena Hellström (Falun), Jehns Christian Martineus (Lund University). Vietnam: Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan (Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam), Leonid Padyukov (Karolinska Institutet, Sweden). United Kingdom: Paul New (Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust), Hazel Platt (Centre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research, University of Manchester), Simon Rothwell (Centre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research, University of Manchester). UKMYONET: Yasmeen Ahmed (Llandudno General Hospital), Raymond Armstrong (Southampton General Hospital), Robert Bernstein (Manchester Royal Infirmary), Carol Black (Royal Free Hospital, London), Simon Bowman (University Hospital, Birmingham), Ian Bruce (Manchester Royal Infirmary), Robin Butler (Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry), John Carty (Lincoln County Hospital), Chandra Chattopadhyay (Wrightington Hospital), Easwaradhas Chelliah (Wrightington Hospital), Fiona Clarke (James Cook University Hospital, Middlesborough), Peter Dawes (Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke on Trent), Christopher Denton (Royal Free London), Joseph Devlin (Pinderfields General Hospital, Wakefield), Christopher Edwards (Southampton General Hospital), Paul Emery (Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds), John Fordham (South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesborough), Alexander Fraser (Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds), Hill Gaston (Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge), Patrick Gordon (King’s College Hospital, London), Bridget Griffiths (Freeman Hospital, Newcastle), Harsha Gunawardena (Frenchay Hospital, Bristol), Frances Hall (Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge), Michael Hanna (University College London Hospitals), Beverley Harrison (North Manchester General Hospital), Elaine Hay (Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke on Trent), David Hilton-Jones (Oxford University Hospitals), Lesley Horden (Dewsbury District General Hospital), John Isaacs (Freeman Hospital, Newcastle), David Isenberg (University College London Hospitals), Adrian Jones (Nottingham University Hospital), Sanjeet Kamath (Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke on Trent), Thomas Kennedy (Royal Liverpool Hospital), George Kitas (Dudley Group Hospitals Trust, Birmingham), Peter Klimiuk (Royal Oldham Hospital), Sally Knights (Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset), John Lambert (Doncaster Royal Infirmary), Peter Lanyon (Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham), Ramasharan Laxminarayan (Queen’s Hospital, Burton Upon Trent), Bryan Lecky (Walton Neuroscience Centre, Liverpool), Raashid Luqmani (Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford), Pedro Machado (University College London Hospitals), Jeffrey Marks (Steeping Hill Hospital, Stockport), Michael Martin (St. James University Hospital, Leeds), Dennis McGonagle (Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Disease, Leeds), Neil McHugh (Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath), Francis McKenna (Trafford General Hospital, Manchester), John McLaren (Cameron Hospital, Fife), Michael McMahon (Dumfries & Galloway Royal Infirmary, Dumfries), Euan McRorie (Western General Hospital, Edinburgh), Peter Merry (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich), Sarah Miles (Dewsbury & District General Hospital, Dewsbury), James Miller (Royal Victoria Hospital, Newcastle), Anne Nicholls (West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St. Edmunds), Jennifer Nixon (Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester), Voon Ong (Royal Free Hospital, London), Katherine Over (Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester), John Packham (Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke on Trent), Nicolo Pipitone (King’s College Hospital, London), Michael Plant (South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesborough), Gillian Pountain (Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntington), Thomas Pullar (Ninewells Hospital, Dundee), Mark Roberts (Salford Royal Foundation Trust), Paul Sanders (Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester), David Scott (King’s College Hospital, London), David Scott (Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich), Michael Shadforth (Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Stoke on Trent), Thomas Sheeran (Cannock Chase Hospital, Cannock, Staffordshire), Arul Srinivasan (Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford), David Swinson (Wrightington Hospital), Lee-Suan Teh (Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn), Michael Webley (Stoke Manderville Hospital, Aylesbury), Brian Williams (University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff) and Jonathan Winer (Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham).