Article Text

SAT0488 Comparative effectiveness of ayurveda and conventional care in knee osteoarthritis – a randomized controlled trial
  1. CS Kessler1,
  2. K Dhiman2,
  3. A Kumar3,
  4. T Ostermann4,
  5. S Gupta5,
  6. A Morandi6,
  7. M Mittwede7,
  8. E Stapelfeldt1,
  9. M Spoo1,
  10. K Icke8,
  11. A Michalsen1,
  12. C Witt8
  1. 1Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Immanuel Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  2. 2Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences
  3. 3All India Institute of Ayurveda, New Delhi, India
  4. 4Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Witten Herdecke, Witten, Germany
  5. 5Department of Kaya Cikitsa, J.S. Ayurveda College & P.D. Patel Ayurveda Hospital, Nadiad, India
  6. 6School of Ayurvedic Medicine, Ayurvedic Point, Milan, Italy
  7. 7European Academy of Ayurveda, Birstein
  8. 8Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany


Background Traditional Indian Medicine Ayurveda is used to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA) despite limited evidence.

Objectives We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of complex Ayurvedic treatment compared to complex conventional care in knee OA patients.

Methods According to ACR criteria patients with knee OA were included in a multicenter randomized, controlled trial and treated in 2 hospital outpatient clinics and 2 private outpatient clinics in Germany with 5 physicians and 20 therapists participating. Patients received either Ayurvedic treatment (n=77) or conventional care (n=74) with 15 treatments over 12 weeks. Primary outcome was the change on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index after 12 weeks (validated German version). Secondary outcomes included the WOMAC subscales; a pain disability index, numeric rating scales for pain and sleep quality, a pain experience scale, a quality-of-life index, a profile of mood index, rescue medication use, and safety issues.

Results A total of 151 patients (Ayurveda n=77, conventional care n=74) were included. Changes of the WOMAC Index from baseline to 12 weeks were more pronounced in the Ayurveda group (mean difference 61.0 [95% CI 52.4;69.6]) than in the conventional group (32.0 [95% CI 21.4;42.6]) resulting in a significant difference between groups (p<0.001) and a clinically relevant effect size (Cohen's d 0.68 [95% CI 0.35;1.01]). Similar tendencies were observed for all secondary outcomes at week 12. Effects were sustainable at follow-ups after 6 and 12 months.

Conclusions The results suggest that a complex Ayurvedic treatment might be clinically superior to a complex conventional intervention in the treatment of OA of the knee.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.