Article Text

FRI0253 Patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with subcutaneous tocilizumab compared with placebo or intravenous tocilizumab in combination with csdmards
  1. V Strand1,
  2. K Lampl2,
  3. C Birchwood2,
  4. J Pei2,
  5. K Tuckwell3,
  6. R Finch3,
  7. A Kivitz4,
  8. G Burmester5
  1. 1Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto
  2. 2Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, United States
  3. 3Roche, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
  4. 4Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, United States
  5. 5Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany


Background Two previous randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), BREVACTA and SUMMACTA, showed subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) was superior to placebo (PBO) and comparable to intravenous TCZ (TCZ-IV) in combination with csDMARDs for improving RA disease activity.1,2

Objectives To compare the efficacy of TCZ-SC with PBO or TCZ-IV + csDMARDs for improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in 2 RCT populations.

Methods Both RCTs enrolled patients (pts) with inadequate responses to DMARDs; up to 20% had inadequate responses to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. In BREVACTA, pts received blinded TCZ-SC 162 mg or PBO every 2 weeks (q2w) + csDMARDs for 24 weeks. In SUMMACTA, pts received TCZ-SC 162 mg weekly or TCZ-IV 8 mg/kg q4w + csDMARDs for the 24-week double-blind period. PROs, assessed at 12 weeks (prior to rescue) in BREVACTA and 24 weeks in SUMMACTA, included patient global assessment (PtGA; visual analog score [VAS], 0–100 mm), pain (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI, 0–3) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical and mental component summary (PCS, MCS: 0–50) and domain (0–100) scores. The proportions of pts reporting scores ≥ minimum clinically important differences (MCID) and ≥ age/gender-matched normative values were assessed for each treatment group.

Results Baseline PRO scores were mostly comparable between treatment groups in each study and between study populations. In BREVACTA, significantly more pts who received TCZ-SC reported scores ≥ MCID for all PROs at week 12 compared with PBO (54% to 73% vs 42% to 55%, respectively; number needed to treat [NNT], 5.2 to 13.0). Compared with 1% to 20% at baseline, 8% to 34% of pts who received TCZ-SC and 4% to 25% of PBO pts reported scores ≥ normative values in all PROs at week 12 (Table). In SUMMACTA, similar proportions of pts who received TCZ-SC and TCZ-IV reported scores ≥ MCID in all PROs at week 24 (61% to 84% vs 64% to 84%, respectively). The proportion of patients who reported scores ≥ normative values was comparable between the TCZ-SC and TCZ-IV groups across all PROs; compared with 0.2% to 23% at baseline, 14% to 41% of pts who received TCZ-SC and 15% to 42% of pts who received TCZ-IV reported scores ≥ normative values at week 24 (Table).

Conclusions In BREVACTA, TCZ-SC + csDMARDs resulted in significantly greater improvements across all PROs and significantly more pts reporting scores ≥ MCID at week 12 compared with PBO. Similarly, more pts receiving TCZ-SC reported scores ≥ normative values at week 12 compared with PBO, despite few pts with such scores at baseline. Responses were similar between pts treated with TCZ-SC and TCZ-IV + csDMARDs in SUMMACTA at week 24. These data show TCZ treatment resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in PROs and indicate that attainment of normative scores is a realistic goal in treatment of pts with active RA.


  1. Kivitz A, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:1653–61.

  2. Burmester G, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:69–74.


Acknowledgements This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech.

Disclosure of Interest V. Strand Consultant for: Abbvie; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Biogen Idec; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celltrion; Crescendo; Genentech/Roche; GlaxoSmithKline; Janssen; Lilly; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Regeneron; Samsung; Sanofi; UCB, K. Lampl Employee of: Genentech, Inc, C. Birchwood Employee of: Genentech, Inc, J. Pei Employee of: Genentech, Inc, K. Tuckwell Shareholder of: Roche, Employee of: Roche, R. Finch Shareholder of: Roche, Employee of: Roche, A. Kivitz Consultant for: Genentech; Novartis; Pfizer; Sanofi-Regeneron; UCB, G. Burmester Grant/research support from: Roche, Consultant for: Roche

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.