Background The relation of knee replacement (KR) surgery to all-cause mortality has not been well established owing to potential biases in previous studies. Thus, we aimed to examine the relation of KR to mortality risk among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) focusing on identifying biases that may threaten the validity of prior studies.
Methods We included knee OA subjects (ages 50–89 years) from The Health Improvement Network, an electronic medical records database in the UK. Risk of mortality among KR subjects was compared with propensity score-matched non-KR subjects. To explore residual confounding bias, subgroup analyses stratified by age and propensity scores were performed.
Results Subjects with KR had 28% lower risk of mortality than non-KR subjects (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78). However, when stratified by age, protective effect was noted only in older age groups (>63 years) but not in younger subjects (≤63 years). Further, the mortality rate among KR subjects decreased as candidacy (propensity score) for KR increased among subjects with KR, but no such consistent trend was noted among non-KR subjects.
Conclusions While a protective effect of KR on mortality cannot be ruled out, findings of lower mortality among older KR subjects and those with higher propensity scores suggest that prognosis-based selection for KR may lead to intractable confounding by indication; hence, the protective effect of KR on all-cause mortality may be overestimated.
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Outcomes research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Handling editor Tore K Kvien
TN and YZ are co-last authors.
Contributors DM was involved in study design, interpreting results and drafting and revising manuscript. NL was involved in data extraction, analyses and interpreting results. YZ and TN were involved in study design, interpreting results and manuscript preparation. DF, HKC and JS were involved in interpreting results and manuscript preparation.
Funding This study was funded by Arthritis Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship award and supported by NIAMS P60AR47785, ACR Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award and Boston University CTSI KL2 scholarship (grant number 5KL2TR001411-02).
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Boston University School of Medicine.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.