Article Text

OP0160 Characterization of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Subgroups with Features of Antiphospholipid or Sjögrens's Syndrome Utilizing Affinity Proteomics
  1. H. Idborg1,
  2. A. Zandian2,
  3. J.T. Gustafsson1,
  4. I. Gunnarsson1,
  5. E. Svenungsson1,
  6. P. Nilsson2,
  7. P.-J. Jakobsson1
  1. 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet
  2. 2Affinity Proteomics, Science for Life Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, KTH – Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden


Background Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that covers a wide range of phenotypes, from subtle symptoms to life-threatening conditions. The heterogeneous presentation of SLE is a major obstacle in clinical trials and the lack of biomarkers also hampers accurate diagnosis and choice of treatment.

Objectives In this study we explored biochemical pathways in two suggested subgroups of SLE utilizing affinity proteomics in order to characterize subgroups and identify biomarkers for personalized medicine.

Methods We have utilized Karolinska SLE cohort consisting of 320 well-characterized SLE patients and 320 individually matched population based controls in a cross-sectional study. SLE subgroups were defined only based on patients' autoantibody profile: an Antiphospholipid Syndrome-like (APS-like, n=55) and a Sjögren's Syndrome-like (SS-like, n=58) subgroup. Based on literature and clinical knowledge we have made a targeted selection of 281 proteins targeted by in total 367 antibodies from the Human Protein Atlas. Antibodies were covalently coupled to color-coded magnetic beads. EDTA-plasma samples were labeled with biotin and screened in a 384 bead array format. The read-out was made by adding a streptavidin fluorophore and using suspension bead arrays.

Results We identified differences in protein profiles comparing APS-like and SS-like SLE subgroups: The top most significantly different proteins were Integrin beta 1 (p=9.8e-8, Log2 fold change=1,5), renin (p=2.7e-5, Log2 fold change=0.5), glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase 1 (p=2.9e-5, Log2 fold change=0,5) and Apolipoprotein M (p=3.4e-5, Log2 fold change=0,3) that all were increased in SS-like SLE, while Apolipoprotein H (β2-GPI, p=6.6e-5, Log2 fold change=-0,3) were increased in the APS-like subgroup.

Conclusions The two suggested SLE subgroups were defined exclusively on autoantibody profile as the APS-like and the SS-like subgroups. Our results demonstrate that the two subgroups differ in their protein profiles and that these observations indicate underlying pathogenic differences between SS-like and APS-like SLE. A common etiology of the presence of β2-GPI in both APS and in APS-like SLE is suggested. Therefore, we believe that stratification of SLE patients should be further explored towards personalized medicine.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.