Objectives Lung exposures including cigarette smoking and silica exposure are associated with the risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the association between textile dust exposure and the risk of RA in the Malaysian population, with a focus on women who rarely smoke.
Methods Data from the Malaysian Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis population-based case–control study involving 910 female early RA cases and 910 female age-matched controls were analysed. Self-reported information on ever/never occupationally exposed to textile dust was used to estimate the risk of developing anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive and ACPA-negative RA. Interaction between textile dust and the human leucocyte antigen DR β-1 (HLA-DRB1) shared epitope (SE) was evaluated by calculating the attributable proportion due to interaction (AP), with 95% CI.
Results Occupational exposure to textile dust was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing RA in the Malaysian female population (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.2). The association between occupational exposure to textile dust and risk of RA was uniformly observed for the ACPA-positive RA (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8) and ACPA-negative RA (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0) subsets, respectively. We observed a significant interaction between exposure to occupational textile dust and HLA-DRB1 SE alleles regarding the risk of ACPA-positive RA (OR for double exposed: 39.1, 95% CI 5.1 to 297.5; AP: 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.2).
Conclusions This is the first study demonstrating that textile dust exposure is associated with an increased risk for RA. In addition, a gene–environment interaction between HLA-DRB1 SE and textile dust exposure provides a high risk for ACPA-positive RA.
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multifactorial disease that involves the interaction between environmental and genetic factors.1–7 Smoking is one of the most established risk factors for disease development,7–11 and a profound interaction between smoking and human leucocyte antigen DR β-1 (HLA-DRB1) shared epitope (SE) alleles regarding the risk of anti-citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA)-positive RA has been reported in several studies.1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ,12–16 There is growing support for the hypothesis that this gene–environment interaction may induce changes in the lung tissues, where immunity against citrullinated antigens may be triggered in individuals with certain genotypes.1 ,7 ,17–19
Silica is another lung exposure that has been associated with the risk of ACPA-positive,20 ,21 indicating that exposure to other noxious agents than smoke in the lung may provide a risk for RA. Exposure to textile dust has been shown to impair the lung functions of workers22–25 and increase the risk of respiratory diseases,22 ,26 ,27 but whether it is involved in RA development remains to be elucidated. The investigation of genetic and environmental risk factors for RA in Malaysia (Malaysian Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis (MyEIRA))2 ,21 ,28–32 offers an opportunity to investigate the association between textile dust and RA risk.
In the present study, we specifically investigated whether occupational exposure to textile dust, which is common in Malaysia, may increase the risk of RA overall as well as the subsets of RA defined by ACPA status. We additionally explored the interaction between textile dust exposure and the HLA SE alleles in relation to the RA subsets.
Materials and methods
This study is based on the MyEIRA case–control study, a sister study to the Swedish EIRA study involving early RA cases.20 The study design of MyEIRA has been described in details elsewhere.28 ,32 Briefly, study subjects aged between 18 and 70 years were recruited between 2005 and 2009 from a defined geographical area in Peninsular Malaysia. In this report, data from 910 female RA cases and 910 female controls were analysed. Male subjects were excluded as textile dust exposure among men was very scarce (two exposed cases among 155 male RA and one exposed control out of 150 male controls). Moreover, the smoking frequency was high among the men (46% and 28% in male RA cases and male controls, respectively) but was very low among the women (1% among cases and 0.4% among controls, respectively).2
Case identification and selection of controls
Patients with early RA were identified from nine rheumatology clinics throughout Peninsular Malaysia. All RA cases were diagnosed by rheumatologists and fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.33 One control per RA case was randomly selected from the general population and matched on the age, sex and residential area. For the RA cases, the disease onset was defined at the time of having first symptoms giving suspicion of RA. The year in which these symptoms occurred was defined as the index year and the same index year was used for the corresponding control.
Data collection and blood sampling
Both RA cases and controls underwent a face-to-face interview by trained personnel to obtain information on lifestyle and environmental exposures using an identical questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised a wide range of questions on socioeconomic background, lifestyle, life events, working history, working conditions and exposures to chemicals or substances at work, including questions on textile and silica dust. Of the 1166 identified early RA cases, 1076 (92%) completed the questionnaire. Of these 1076 RA cases, 85.6% (n=921) were females. Eleven of the female RA cases, however, did not have matched controls and were excluded from analysis. For the control subjects, a total of 1069 population-based controls participated by answering the questionnaire, and 86.0% (n=919) were females. Nine of the females did not match any of the RA cases and thus were excluded from data analysis. Finally, data from 910 female RA cases and 910 age-matched and residential area-matched female controls were analysed in this study. Sera and DNA samples were obtained from all the participants for laboratory investigations.
HLA-DRB1 genotyping and autoantibodies measurements
The methods for determining the HLA-DRB1 alleles have previously been reported.28 In brief, the four-digit HLA-DRB1 genotyping was performed by using the LABType HD Class II DRB1 sequence specific oligonucleotide assay (One Lambda, California, USA) with the Luminex Multi-Analyte Profiling System (xMAP, Luminex Corporation, Texas, USA). The HLA-DRB1 SE alleles were defined as the presence of DRB1*01:01, DRB1*01:02, DRB1*01:07, DRB1*04:01, DRB1*04:04, DRB1*04:05, DRB1*04:08, DRB1*04:10, DRB1*10:01 and DRB1*10:03. Individuals with one or two SE alleles are categorised as SE-positive. ACPA status was assessed by using an anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) second-generation ELISA kits (Immunoscan RA, Malmö, Sweden). Samples with results >25 AU/mL were defined as positive.28 ,31
Assessment of exposures
Participants were asked whether they had ever been exposed to textile dust at work. Individuals were classified as occupationally exposed to textile dust if they reported exposure before or during the index year. Individuals with missing information (53 female RA cases and 35 female controls) were excluded from the analysis (table 1).
Potential confounding factors
Age and residential area were design variables and adjusted for in the analysis. We considered smoking as a potential confounder, but there were only two female patients with RA who were ever smokers and none in the control group. In addition, formal educational level (categorised as no formal education, primary education, secondary education or college/university) and ethnicity (categorised as Malay, Chinese, Indian and others) were adjusted for in all analyses, but these factors only marginally changed the results and were therefore not retained in the final analysis.
In the present study, only data on occupational exposure before and during the index year have been analysed. Subjects who had ever been exposed to occupational textile dust were compared with those unexposed regarding risk of developing RA, ACPA-positive RA and ACPA-negative RA. The ORs with 95% CIs were calculated by means of unconditional logistic regression. Possible interaction between textile dust exposure and HLA-DRB1 SE alleles was evaluated as departure from additivity by calculating the attributable proportion due to interaction (AP), with 95% CI.44 Analyses were conducted using Stata V.12.0.
Characteristics of the MyEIRA subjects
In this report, we analysed a total of 910 female RA cases and 910 female population-based controls. The median duration of time from disease onset to enrolment in the study was 1 year, with an IQR of 2 years. The distribution of ethnic groups (Malay, Chinese, Indian and other subethnicities) is presented in table 1. The proportion of ACPA positivity and HLA-DRB1 SE alleles carriage among the female patients with RA were 63.2% and 39.6%, respectively. Occupational exposure to textile dust was reported by 4.5% of the female patients with RA (n=41, whereof Malay=14, Chinese=11, Indian=13 and other=3) and by 1.7% of the women in the control group (n=15, whereof Malay=6, Chinese=5, Indian=3 and other=1).
Textile dust and the risk of developing ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA
Those exposed to occupational textile dust had an increased risk of developing RA compared with unexposed individuals (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.2). Furthermore, our findings demonstrated that occupational exposure to textile dust was significantly associated with increased risk for both ACPA-positive RA (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.8) and ACPA-negative RA (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0) (table 2).
Interaction between occupational textile dust exposures and HLA-DRB1 SE alleles
An increased risk of ACPA-positive RA was seen among carriers of HLA-DRB1 SE alleles who were exposed to occupational textile dust compared with non-carriers of SE alleles not exposed to textile dust (OR 39.1, 95% CI 5.1 to 297.5) (table 3 and figure 1). We observed a significant interaction between HLA-DRB1 SE alleles and occupational exposure to textile dust with regard to risk of ACPA-positive RA (AP=0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.2). The combination of occupational exposure to textile dust and HLA-DRB1 SE alleles was also associated with an increased risk of ACPA-negative RA (OR 9.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 89.4), but no statistical significant interaction was observed (AP=0.6, 95% CI −0.4 to 1.6) (table 3).
We observed that occupational exposure to textile dust was associated with an increased risk of ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA among Malaysian women. Additionally, a statistically significant interaction between occupational textile dust exposure and presence of HLA-DRB1 SE alleles was seen concerning risk to develop ACPA-positive RA.
We note that the association between textile dust exposure and risk for RA differs from what has previously been observed for smoking and silica as textile dust exposure is associated with risk for both ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative disease, whereas smoking and silica provide risk for only ACPA-positive disease.2 ,8 ,20 ,21 We do not have any mechanistic hypothesis for this difference and can only speculate that textile dust exposure may have a more general effect on immune activation, also in ACPA-negative disease than is the case for cigarette smoke and silica dust exposure. Whether there is an interaction between textile dust and smoking with regard to risk of developing ACPA-positive RA, as is the case for silica,20 ,34 could not be studied in the present investigation since virtually all women never had smoked.
The properties of textile dust content differ depending on the fabric, the manufacturing and processing of the material. For instance, the source of the dust may originate from both natural (eg, wool, cotton) and synthetic (eg, polyester, nylon) materials.35 Also, a wide range of chemicals might be used to attain desirable properties of the fabric, like synthetic dyers, flame retardants, mineral lubricants and water repellents (International Agency for Research on Cancer). The association between textile dust and risk of RA might involve several potential disease mechanisms since the differing physicochemical properties of airborne dust affect where it deposits in the respiratory tract.36
We further propose that natural or synthetic fibres in textile dust might explain an association between textile dust exposure and risk of RA. Due to their unique shape, fibres have been shown to penetrate deep into the lung, where they initiate an inflammatory response.37 However, many textiles contain natural organic fibres and the health effects from natural organic fibres are not as strongly linked to lung disease as inorganic fibres.38
Based on the reasoning above, the participants in MyEIRA may, therefore, have encountered both known and so far to us unknown agents associated with RA either through the textile dust itself or through other confounding hazardous exposures in their work environment during the manufacturing and processing of the textile (like mineral dusts or other chemical dusts). Asbestos is another potential airborne exposure among textile workers.39 ,40
Another potential mechanism behind the demonstrated association between exposure to textile dust and risk for RA is bacterial agents that can be found in textile dust, especially endotoxin, which is a bacterial agent produced by all Gram-negative bacteria and is believed to cause respiratory diseases in textile workers by generating an inflammatory response in the lungs.24 ,27 ,41 ,42 The present study design does not, however, allow us to further address this possibility.
A very interesting finding was the observation of a similar interaction between occupational exposure to textile dust and HLA-DRB1 SE in relation to ACPA-positive disease as has been seen for cigarette smoking and HLA-DRB1 SE.2 ,7 Here, we may speculate that similar events, that is, exposure to textile dust or smoking, may contribute to the production of citrullinated peptides, which, in the context of certain HLA alleles, may contribute to activation of anti-citrulline immunity in lungs.17 ,18 Our statistical analysis did not identify this SE–textile interaction in ACPA-negative RA. This is in line with the lack of association between ACPA-negative RA and HLA-DRB1 SE in Malaysian RA.28 However, the power of this analysis was limited.
Our study has several advantages. The MyEIRA study is a population-based case–control study including incident cases. It contains information on both environmental and genetic risk factors. The response rate was high (94.2% among cases, 96.2% among controls), which limits the risk of selection bias. Also, we recruited cases with short disease duration in an attempt to overcome differential misclassification of exposure, that is, that cases would recall their previous exposures differently from the controls. RA cases were selected by rheumatologists based upon their medical records, and the median duration of disease among the cases was 1 year with an IQR of 2 years. Thus, the inclusion of early RA cases gives an advantage that the patients are less likely to have had time to change their occupation due to RA manifestations, which possibly may influence the quality of the reported information on occupational exposures. However, we do not believe that recalling occupational exposures was difficult neither among cases nor among controls, and therefore, differential misclassification of textile dust exposure most probably is marginal and the possible non-differential misclassification that may have occurred would tend to bias our estimates towards the null value.
The study used the 1987 ACR criteria for the diagnosis of RA16 as the investigation started before the new 2010 European League Against Rheumatism/ACR criteria were introduced. The frequency of ACPA-positive RA was 63%, which is well in line with data from other similar cohorts, including the Swedish EIRA study.43 A potential disadvantage is that some cases of RA in the selected areas may not have been included, thus generating a potential selection bias. Provided the design of this study, we consider such missing inclusion to be due mainly to administrative reasons, such as high burden of work and change of personnel (that are not informed about the study) and most probably not related to textile dust exposure. We thus believe that bias due to misclassification of disease does not constitute a major bias in this study.
We did not collect data on potentially harmful chemical hazards present in the textile industry, such as other organic dusts or organic solvents. Moreover, we do not know how many of the female textile workers conducted their work from home. Working with textiles in a home environment or an industrial environment might affect the likelihood of being exposed to chemicals that possibly may act as confounders. Passive smoking is theoretically another exposure that may have confounded the estimated association between textile dust and RA. There is, however, no reason to believe that women exposed to textile dust are more exposed to passive smoking than women that are not exposed.
The genetic heterogeneity in our multiethnic study population for MyEIRA study is a concern. In order to reduce this problem, we performed stratified analyses by ethnicity and could demonstrate that all the ethnic groups showed similar trends towards the risk of developing RA, although the limited power did not permit separate formal analysis in each ethnic group.
We observed an association between occupational textile dust and risk of developing RA. The high risk of developing ACPA-positive RA among HLA-DRB1 SE-positive individuals exposed to textile dust, and the significant gene–environment interaction between HLA-DRB1 SE and textile dust supports the hypothesis that various lung exposures may play an important role in the aetiology of RA. The increased risk also in ACPA-negative RA where there is no link to HLA-DRB1 SE indicates, however, that also other mechanisms may be involved, which have to be further investigated. From a public health perspective, our results imply that efforts should be considered to reduce the incidence of RA by reducing occupational exposure to textile dust.
The authors would like to thank the Director General of Health, Malaysia, for supporting the work described in this paper. Special thanks to the members of MyEIRA study group and the rheumatologists: Heselynn Hussein, Wahinuddin Sulaiman, Ing Soo Lau, Suk Chyn Gun, Nor Suhaila Sharil, Eishwary M, Mohd Shahrir Said, Ainon Mokhtar, Azmillah Rosman, Muhaini Othman for their dedication and excellent assistance in this study. The authors truly value the patients and controls for their great participation.
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Handling editor Tore K Kvien
Collaborators MyEIRA Study Group: Heselynn Hussein; Wahinuddin Sulaiman; Ing Soo Lau; Suk Chyn Gun; Nor Suhaila Sharil; Eishwary M; Mohd Shahrir Said; Ainon Mokhtar; Azmillah Rosman; Muhaini Othman.
Contributors CLT had full access to all data in this study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. CLT, NAM and AI were responsible for the statistical analysis, interpreting the results and drafting the paper. CLT, NAM, LP, LA, LK, SM and CB conceived the study and participated in the design of the study and manuscript editing. CLT and LP performed serological and molecular genetics assay. CLT and LP take responsibility for the acquisition of the experimental data, analysis and interpretation of data. SM is the principal investigator of MyEIRA, LA and LK are the principal investigators of EIRA. All authors were involved in revising the paper critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published.
Funding This study was supported by grants from Ministry of Health Malaysia (MRG-200512, JPP-IMR 07-046, JPP-IMR 08-006, JPP-IMR 07-017 and JPP-IMR 08-012) and from the Swedish National Research Council (DNR 348-2009-6468).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval The MyEIRA study was approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health in Malaysia (KKM/JEPP/02 Jld.1 (86); (14)dlm.KKM/NIHSEC/08/0804/ MRG-2005-12).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement The authors have no objection and are willing to share the data used for the current research article.