Article Text

AB1165 Effectiveness of Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology: Results from the Score Study
  1. R. Almodovar1,
  2. A. Fernandez Nebro2,
  3. L.A. Gracia Perez3,
  4. J.A. Román Ivorra4,
  5. J.R. Rodríguez Cros5,
  6. J. del Pino Montes6,
  7. A. Rodríguez-Serrano7,
  8. S. Muñoz-Fernández7
  1. 1Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundaciόn Alcorcon, Madrid
  2. 2Rheumatology Unit, HospitalUniversitario General Carlos Haya, Malaga
  3. 3Rheumatology Unit, Hospital de Sagunto
  4. 4Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia
  5. 5Rheumatology Unit, Hospital General de Vic, Barcelona
  6. 6Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca
  7. 7Rheumatology Unit, Hospital Universitario Infanta sofia, Madrid, Spain


Background Nursing Consultations in Rheumatology (NCR) are organizational care models that provide care centred on the rheumatology patient within the scope of a nurse's abilities.

Objectives To analyze the effectiveness and quality of care of NCR.

Methods National multicenter observational prospective cohort study one year follow-up, comparing patients attending rheumatology services with and without NCR. NCR was defined by the presence: 1) Office itself; 2) at least one dedicated nurse, albeit part-time; 3) own agenda citation; and 4) phone.

Variables included were (baseline, 6 and 12 months): a) Clinical activity, research and training, infrastructure of unit and resources of NCR); b) Socio-demographics, work productivity (WPAI), assessment of rheumatic disease, use of services and treatments, quality of life, knowledge of the disease and treatment and perceived quality of care. Analysis: Chi square, Fischer's test, t-Student test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon and McNemar's tests were used.

Results A total of 393 patients were included: 181NCR and 212 not NCR, corresponding to 39 units, 21 with NCR and 18 without NCR (age 53±11,8 vs 56±13,5 years); females 70% vs 61% and AR 78.5% vs 75,5%. Statistically significant differences were found in patients attended in sites without NCR for the following parameters: higher CRP level (5.9±8.3 vs 4.8±7.8; p<0.005), global disease patient VAS (3.6±2.3 vs 3.1±2.4), physician VAS (2.9±2.1 vs 2.3±2.1; p<0.05) and use of primary care consultations (2.7±5.4 vs 1.4±2.3; p<0.001), worse work productivity, knowledge of the disease, treatment adherence and perceived quality. There were no significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups.

Conclusions The presence of NCR in the Rheumatology unit contributes to a lower frequency of primary care consultations, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with rheumatic diseases, also the knowledge of the disease, leading to an improvement of patient adherence to treatment and perceived quality of care.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.