Article Text

AB0595 Evaluation of Cognitive Function by Electrophysiological Study in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients with Previous Neuropsychiatric Involvement
  1. Y. Gao1,
  2. T.F. Cheung1,
  3. J. Gao1,
  4. E. Lau2,
  5. H.Y. Wan2,
  6. M.Y. Mok1
  1. 1Department of Medicine
  2. 2Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong


Background Previous studies on cognitive dysfunction evaluated by electrophysiological test in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who had previous neuropsychiatric involvement (NPSLE) were inconsistent.

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate P300 as an electrophysiological marker of cognitive function in NPSLE patients who were diagnosed to have cognitive impairment by standard neuropsychological tests.

Methods Event-related potentials (ERP) were assessed by the auditory and visual oddball paradigms. Amplitude and latency of P300 at the frontal (Fz), central (Cz) and parietal (Pz) regions were determined and compared to controls.

Results Sixteen patients with previous NPSLE were identified to have cognitive impairment, defined as one or more tests below 2 standard deviations of demographically normative data, among 20 patients recruited for comprehensive neuropsychological tests. P300 detection was performed in NPSLE patients with cognitive impairment (n=9), matched SLE patients without previous NPSLE (non-NPSLE) (n=9), and healthy controls (n=15). Auditory oddball task did not show any P300 abnormality between groups. Visual oddball task revealed reduced amplitude of P300 over Fz (p=0.002) and Cz (p=0.009) electrodes in NPSLE patients compared to healthy controls and among those who had predominant memory deficit (p=0.01 at Fz). Abnormal P300 was also observed in non-NPSLE patients at Fz and Cz.

Conclusions P300 elicited by auditory oddball paradigm was not a sensitive electrophysiological marker for cognitive impairment in NPSLE patients. Using visual oddball paradigm, abnormal P300 was found in NPSLE patients over frontal and parietal regions compared to normal controls but was not discriminative from possible subclinical disease in non-NPSLE patients.

Disclosure of Interest None declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.