Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
B cell depletion is an effective remission induction and maintenance therapy in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV).1–6 Rituximab targets both pathogenic effector B cells and protective regulatory B cells. To avoid infections and adverse events from therapy, clinicians require improved markers of disease activity and impending relapse to guide immunosuppression strategies following B cell depletion. We reported that CD5+ B cells, as a surrogate marker of B regulatory cells, are decreased in patients with active AAV and normalise during disease remission.7 After B cell depletion, patients who repopulated with a low or decreasing percentage of CD5+ B cells and were on low maintenance immunosuppression had a shorter time to relapse than patients on similar levels of immunosuppression with normalised CD5+ B cells or patients with similarly low CD5+ B cells but higher immunosuppression. The CD5+CD24hiCD38hi B cell subpopulation correlates inversely with active disease but parallels both interleukin (IL)-10 production and suppression of ANCA.8 CD5 may identify B cells enriched in IL-10 production, the defining cytokine of B regulatory cells.8 ,9 Whether CD5+ B cells can serve as an indicator of time to relapse without considering remission maintenance immunosuppression dose is not known. We sought to address this question and confirm our previous findings in a larger cohort by separating patients solely based on their CD5+ B cells at repopulation.
We examined B cell phenotype in 50 patients with AAV following rituximab therapy by flow cytometry (table 1). Patients with ANCA-negative vasculitis or history of other autoimmune disease were excluded. Data available from the University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospitals McLendon Clinical Flow Cytometry Laboratories were reanalysed with FACSDiva software to determine the percentage of CD5+ B cells instead of CD5+ lymphocytes typically reported in this clinical test (figure 1A). Patients were divided into two groups at first B cell repopulation (≥1% CD19+/CD20+ lymphocytes): those who repopulated with >30% (high) CD5+ B cells and those who repopulated with ≤30% (low) CD5+ B cells. Maintenance immunosuppression with other agents did not factor into patient grouping. Patients who repopulated with low CD5+ B cells relapsed sooner (median=16 months (IQR=12–19)) than patients who repopulated with high CD5+ B cells (23 months (18–30); p=0.005) after rituximab (figure 1B). If time to relapse from B cell repopulation was considered, patients who repopulated with low CD5+ B cells relapsed much sooner (3 months (1–9)) than patients who repopulated with high CD5+ (12 months (6–21), p=0.001; table 1). Although patients repopulating with low CD5+ B cells had less upper respiratory involvement, time to relapse remained significantly shorter for these patients after adjusting for upper respiratory involvement by time-to-event proportional hazards modelling (table 1). Controlling for upper respiratory involvement and PR3 serotype, those with low CD5 remained at higher risk for relapse with a HR of 3.7 (95% CI 1.5 to 9.0, p=0.005). HRs and CIs remained constant when controlling for PR3 serotype and lung involvement or with CD5 as a continuous variable. Of 25 patients who relapsed and had additional samples available, 20 (80%) demonstrated a decrease in CD5+ prior to relapse. Longitudinal data following repopulation with high CD5+ B cells depicts decreasing CD5+ B cells prior to relapse (figure 1C).
Our data indicate that a low percentage of CD5+ B cells at B cell repopulation portends a shorter time to relapse following rituximab therapy irrespective of additional immunosuppressive therapy. Monitoring CD5+ B cell repopulation and decrease may serve as a novel immunological biomarker to detect risk of subsequent relapse. We posit that immunosuppression guided by CD5+ B cells to avoid unnecessary treatment when protective CD5+ B cells are present and avoid relapse by proactive treatment when CD5+ B cells are low could offer immeasurable benefit to patients.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the patients and the other healthcare providers involved in their care. We appreciate Grazy Radulian and Holly Brown's help in data retrieval and precision analysis and for cheerfully accommodating our presence in the McLendon Clinical Flow Laboratory. The authors thank Jean Brown and Elizabeth McInnis for their assistance with the figure.
References
Footnotes
Contributors RJF, PHN, JAGM and WFP provided clinical care for the patients. JGM and ESK reviewed patients’ clinical information. DOB, LTA and JGM conceived and designed the research. Clinical flow cytometry data were provided by JLS. YH and SLH provided expert statistical analysis and interpretation. CJP obtained institutional review board approval for this study. CEM, ESK, KAC, LTA and CJP collected data. CEM, JGM, SLH, WFP and DOB interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in reviewing the manuscript and approved the final version.
Funding This work was supported by a Program Project Grant number 5P01DK058335-14 from NIH/NIDDK and the Vasculitis Foundation.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement This research includes flow cytometry data derived from clinical tests and clinical information regarding disease diagnosis and disease status from 50 subjects. The final dataset includes self-reported demographic data and other clinical laboratory data. Even though the final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing, we believe that there remains the possibility of deductive disclosure of subjects. Thus, we will make the data and associated documentation available to users only under a data-sharing agreement that provides for (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.