Article Text

Download PDFPDF
THU0223 Vastus Medialis Muscle FAT Content as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging is A Risk Factor for Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: Relevance in A Clinical Trial
  1. J.-P. Raynauld1,
  2. J.-P. Pelletier1,
  3. F. Abram2,
  4. M. Dorais3,
  5. Y. Wang4,
  6. J. Fairley4,
  7. F. Cicuttini4,
  8. J. Martel-Pelletier1
  1. 1University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (Crchum)
  2. 2Medical Imaging Research & Development, ArthroLab Inc., Montreal
  3. 3StatSciences Inc., Notre-Dame-de-l'Ile-Perrot, Canada
  4. 4Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Background Recent osteoarthritis (OA) studies propose vastus medialis (VM) muscle surface as a variable associated with cartilage volume loss over time. However, such muscle area may also include a significant proportion of fatty infiltration which may influence the knee mechanics/metabolism.

Objectives We contrasted the muscle fatty infiltration with cartilage volume loss and changes in bone marrow lesions (BMLs) assessed by MRI using data from a recent randomized clinical trial in knee OA1.

Methods A subgroup of 143 patients from the according-to-protocol population of a 2-year randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of licofelone vs. naproxen and having MRI acquisitions at baseline and 2 years were studied. MR images of the VM (mm2) were evaluated semi-automatically and VM percentage of fatty infiltration (%Fat) by a fully automated software. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the relationship between VM area and its %Fat, cartilage volume loss, and BML change over 2 years.

Results The average %Fat/VM surface area was 6.3±3.9%. In the VM, the median baseline %Fat (5.1%) was chosen to separate patients with high vs. low fat content. Female (p=0.004) and higher BMI (33.2±5.7 vs. 30.2±5.3, p=0.001) and disability (WOMAC function 59±18 vs. 53±15, p=0.04) were associated with a higher %Fat. Change at 2 years in %Fat was univariately strongly associated with an increase in the BML score in the global knee (p=0.0002) and cartilage volume loss in the global knee (p=0.01), lateral compartment (p=0.02), plateau (p=0.01), and medial plateau (p=0.03). No correlations were found between %Fat change and change in symptoms over time. Multivariate analyses correcting for age, gender, BMI, and meniscal damage revealed correlations with %Fat for the global knee (p=0.011), plateau (p=0.012), and medial plateau (p=0.019) and condyle (p=0.027). Importantly, %Fat change was independently and strongly associated with BML change (p<0.0001). All the above changes were found irrespective of the treatment the patients had during the clinical trial.

Conclusions These data demonstrated, for the first time, that the %Fat in the VM was strongly associated with cartilage volume loss and the occurrence and progression of BMLs

References

  1. Raynauld JP, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:938-47.

Disclosure of Interest : J.-P. Raynauld Consultant for: ArthroLab Inc., J.-P. Pelletier Shareholder of: ArthroLab Inc., F. Abram Employee of: ArthroLab Inc., M. Dorais Consultant for: ArthroLab Inc., Y. Wang: None declared, J. Fairley: None declared, F. Cicuttini: None declared, J. Martel-Pelletier Shareholder of: ArthroLab Inc.

DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.2369

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.