Statistics from Altmetric.com
Clinical studies point towards an association between periodontitis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).1 ,2 A pathogenic role is suggested for Porphyromonas gingivalis.3 P gingivalis may contribute to the pathogenesis of RA by breaking immune tolerance through formation of (bacterial and human) citrullinated proteins, leading to anticitrullinated protein antibody production (ACPA).4 ,5 Since ACPA production precedes RA development6 and because P gingivalis IgG antibodies are long-term stable in untreated periodontitis patients,7 we investigated whether anti-P gingivalis antibody levels are prognostic for development of RA, by assessing these antibodies in a cohort of 289 adults at risk for RA. Patients with arthralgia and seropositivity for IgM-rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) and/or ACPA were selected from a prospective follow-up study on arthritis development.8 They are further referred to as seropositive arthralgia patients (SAP); their median follow-up was 30 months (IQR 13–49).
Baseline sera were used for measurement of ACPA, IgM-RF, C-reactive protein (CRP) and HLA-DRB1 SE carrier status.8 IgA, IgG and IgM antibody levels against P gingivalis were determined by in-house ELISA with a pooled lysate of clinical isolates of P gingivalis as antigen.9 Interference of IgM-RF on anti-P gingivalis antibody assays was excluded by spiking samples with sera with known high titres of RF.
Reference groups for antibody levels against P gingivalis consisted of healthy subjects without periodontitis and without cultivable subgingival P gingivalis (HC, n=36, mean age 34±15 years, 53% female, 14% current smoker) and severe periodontitis patients without systemic disease (PD, n=117, mean age 51±9.3 years, 58% female, 43% current smoker, 42% P gingivalis-culture positive).10 Both groups were recruited among subjects planned for first consultation at the dental department of the University Medical Center Groningen and a referral practice for periodontology (Clinic for Periodontology Groningen).9
IgA and IgG anti-P gingivalis were higher in PD than in HC (both p<0.0001). PD culture-positive for subgingival P gingivalis had higher IgA and IgG anti-P gingivalis than culture-negative PD (p<0.01 and p<0.001). No differences were found for IgM anti-P gingivalis.
Cut-off values for anti-P gingivalis positivity were set at mean+2 SD of HC. Influence of anti-P gingivalis positivity on RA development was analysed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis with time until RA development as dependent variable and age, gender, HLA-DRB1 SE carriage, smoking, number of tender joints, and CRP-, ACPA- and IgM-RF-positivity at inclusion as other variables.
After 12 months (median, IQR 6–20), 33% (n=94) of SAP had developed RA according to 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism criteria. Baseline characteristics of SAP who developed RA (RA+) or did not develop RA (RA−) are listed in table 1.
In SAP, IgG anti-P gingivalis was higher than in HC, but lower than in PD, as was IgA anti-P gingivalis (figure 1A). No differences in IgM anti-P gingivalis were found, nor were differences found for anti-P gingivalis antibody levels between ACPA-positive or ACPA-negative SAP.
SAP who developed RA did not have elevated anti-P gingivalis antibody levels at baseline compared with SAP who did not develop RA within the follow-up period (figure 1B). When using cut-off values for anti-P gingivalis positivity, the proportion of IgA and IgG anti-P gingivalis-positive patients was higher in SAP who did not develop RA (table 1). Besides a weak correlation of IgM anti-P gingivalis with ACPA in SAP who developed RA (p<0.05, r=0.23), no other correlation with anti-P gingivalis was found.
The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed significant influence of ACPA (HR 11, 95% CI 5.1 to 24, p<0.0001), IgM-RF (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.1, p<0.0001), number of tender joints (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09, p<0.05) and HLA-DRB1 SE carriage (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6, p<0.05) on RA development. Influences of anti-P gingivalis, CRP, age, gender and smoking could not be established. Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that anti-P gingivalis antibody levels are not prognostic for development of RA.
Contributors Study conception and design: JW, EB, LAvdS and DvS. Acquisition of data: LAvdS, DvS, MdS, BD-vdM and KMJJ. Analysis and interpretation of data: MdS, KMJJ, EB, AJvW, AV, JW and DvS. Drafting of manuscript: MdS. Critical revision: AJvW, AV, EB, JW and DvS.
Funding This study was funded by the authors' institutions. The SAP cohort was supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (grant number 6100.0010) and the Dutch Arthritis Association (grant number 0801034).
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics Committee of the Slotervaart Hospital and the Jan van Breemen Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.