Article Text
Abstract
Objectives The morphogen pathways Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch are attractive targets for antifibrotic therapies in systemic sclerosis. Interference with stem cell regeneration, however, may complicate the use of morphogen pathway inhibitors. We therefore tested the hypothesis that combination therapies with low doses of Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch inhibitors maybe safe and effective for the treatment of fibrosis.
Methods Skin fibrosis was induced by bleomycin and by overexpression of a constitutively active TGF-β receptor type I. Adverse events were assessed by clinical monitoring, pathological evaluation and quantification of Lgr5-positive intestinal stem cells.
Results Inhibition of Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch signalling dose-dependently ameliorated bleomycin-induced and active TGF-β receptor type I-induced fibrosis. Combination therapies with low doses of Hedgehog/Wnt inhibitors or Hedgehog/Notch inhibitors demonstrated additive antifibrotic effects in preventive as well as in therapeutic regimes. Combination therapies were well tolerated. In contrast with high dose monotherapies, combination therapies did not reduce the number of Lgr5 positive intestinal stem cells.
Conclusions Combined inhibition of morphogen pathways exerts additive antifibrotic effects. Combination therapies are well tolerated and, in contrast to high dose monotherapies, may not impair stem cell renewal. Combined targeting of morphogen pathways may thus help to overcome dose-limiting toxicity of Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch signalling.
- Fibroblasts
- Systemic Sclerosis
- Treatment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Introduction
The complex pathogenesis of many rheumatological diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and pulmonary arterial hypertension,1 ,2 is stimulating the development of combination therapies that modulate different pathways involved in the disease process. Combinations therapies offer several advantages over monotherapies. Simultaneous inhibition of several disease pathways may have additive effects and increase efficacy. This in turn may allow decreasing the doses of single compounds of the combination regimen, which results in better tolerability with decreased frequency and intensity of drug related toxicities. So far, however, combination therapies have not yet been evaluated for the treatment of fibrotic diseases.
Morphogen pathways such as Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch signalling have recently been characterised as master regulators of fibroblast activation in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and other fibrotic diseases.3–14 Inhibition of either Hedgehog, Wnt or Notch signalling has potent antifibrotic effects in various preclinical models of SSc.3–5 7–9 ,11 ,12 ,15 ,16 These findings may have direct translational implications because several potent and selective inhibitors of these pathways are in clinical trials or already approved. Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch signalling pathways, however, also regulate proliferation and differentiation of stem cells. Long-standing inhibition of these pathways as required in chronic diseases, such as SSc, may cause depletion of stem cells and impair tissue regeneration.17 ,18 Resulting toxicities, in particular in tissues and organs with high cell turnover, such as the intestine, may limit the use of higher doses of morphogen pathway inhibitors in humans. Lower doses of Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch inhibitors with only partial inhibition of the morphogen pathways may warrant regenerative capacity of stem cells, but may not be as effective for the treatment of fibrosis.
Here, we tested the hypothesis that combination therapies with low doses of inhibitors of different morphogen pathways may overcome stem cell toxicity and have additive antifibrotic effects and better tolerability than high dose monotherapies.
Materials and methods
Inhibition of morphogen pathways in experimental fibrosis
Skin fibrosis was induced in DBA/2 mice (Janvier, Le Genest Saint Isle, France) by subcutaneous injections of bleomycin or in C57Bl/6 mice by overexpression of active TGF-β receptor type I (AdTBR) as described.3 ,16 ,19 Hedgehog signalling was targeted with cyclopamine (5 mg/kg/d and 15 mg/kg/d intraperitoneally, LC Labs, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA). Canonical Wnt and Notch signalling were inhibited as described with ICG-001 (2 mg/kg/d and 4 mg/kg/d, Enzo Life Sciences, Loerrach, Germany) and DAPT (γ-secretase inhibitor) (1.5 mg/kg/d and 6 mg/kg/d, Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), respectively. In the mouse model of bleomycin-induced fibrosis, treatment was initiated upon first injection of bleomycin. In contrast, in AdTBR model, treatment was initiated 4 weeks after AdTBR injection, when fibrosis was already established.
The antifibrotic effects were analysed by quantification of skin thickness, hydroxyproline content and α-smooth muscle actin counts as described.3–5 ,7 ,9 ,19 Five to seven samples per group were analysed.
Evaluation of the safety profile
Mice were monitored daily for body weight, food intake, texture of the fur, activity and quality of the stool according to established protocols.8 ,15 The effect of treatment on intestinal stem cells was analysed by staining for Lgr5-positive cells using rabbit polyclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Lgr5-positive intestinal stem cells were counted in at least four different areas at 400-fold magnification in a blinded manner.
Statistics
All data are presented as median with IQR, and differences between the groups were tested for their statistical significance by non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.
Results
Combined inhibition of morphogen pathways exerts additive antifibrotic effects
Inhibition of single morphogen pathways by preventive treatment with cyclopamine, ICG-001 or DAPT potently reduced bleomycin-induced fibrosis in a dose-dependent manner with significant decreases in dermal thickening, numbers of myofibroblasts and hydroxyproline content, even at low doses (figure 1A–C). Simultaneous targeting of morphogen pathways by combination therapies showed additive antifibrotic effects. The decreases in dermal thickening, myofibroblast counts and the hydroxyproline content were significantly more pronounced upon combination therapy cyclopamine/ICG-001 or cyclopamine/DAPT than with single therapy in comparable doses (figure 1A–C). The antifibrotic effects of preventive treatment with low doses of morphogen pathway inhibitors given in combination were comparable with that of high doses of individual inhibitors.
Combination therapies of low doses of morphogen pathway inhibitors prevents depletion of intestinal stem cells
Depletion of stem cells with subsequent toxicity to organs with a high cell turnover, such as the intestine, has been a major concern when targeting morphogen pathways.18 We hypothesised that combination therapy with low doses of inhibitors of different morphogen pathways may allow for sufficient proliferation and differentiation of stem cells. Indeed, we did not observe clinical evidence of gastrointestinal toxicity such as diarrhoea or weight loss in mice treated with low dose monotherapies or with cyclopamine/ICG-001 or cyclopamine/DAPT. In contrast, the recovery from bleomycin-induced weight loss was delayed with high dose monotherapies (see online supplementary figure S1). Texture of the fur and activity of the treated mice also did not differ from control animals. Macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the ileum and the jejunum of mice receiving low-dose combination therapies did not show any differences compared with sham-treated mice. Moreover, staining for Lgr5, which has been characterised as a highly selective pan-intestinal stem cell marker,20 demonstrated low doses of morphogen pathway inhibitors, in either mono therapies or combination therapies, do not decrease the number of pluripotent stem cells in the gut (figure 2A, B). By contrast, high doses of either Hedgehog, Wnt or Notch inhibitors significantly reduced the number of Lgr5 positive stem cells.
Combined inhibition of morphogen pathways is effective in pre-established AdTBR-induced skin fibrosis
To analyse the antifibrotic effects of combined inhibition of morphogen pathways in non-inflammatory model of fibrosis, we employed the mouse model of AdTBR-induced skin fibrosis. In contrast with the preventive approach in bleomycin-induced fibrosis, treatment in the AdTBR model was initiated only after fibrosis had already been manifested. Inhibition of canonical Wnt signalling was more effective in established AdTBR-induced skin fibrosis than inhibition of Notch and Hedgehog signalling with more pronounced effects of ICG-001 as compared with DAPT and cyclopamine at both doses. Moreover, the combination of Wnt and Hedgehog inhibition is more effective than combined inhibition of Notch and Hedgehog signalling. Combination therapies with Notch and Hedgehog inhibitors and intraperitoneally with Wnt and Hedgehog inhibitors were more effective than monotherapies. Treatment with cyclopamine/ICG-001 did prevent progression of fibrosis, and induced regression of pre-established fibrosis with decreases in dermal thickness, in myofibroblast counts and in hydroxyproline content to below pretreatment levels (figure 3A–C).
Discussion
Hedgehog, Wnt or Notch signalling are key players in fibrosis. Since several inhibitors for each of these morphogen pathways are in clinical trials or already approved, Hedgehog, Wnt and Notch signalling are attractive candidates for targeted therapies of fibrotic diseases.3 ,7 ,9 ,11 ,13 ,18 Morphogen pathways also maintain stem cell activity and tissue regeneration, however, toxicities to tissues and organs with a high turnover have always been a concern when considering clinical applications.17 ,18 Indeed, we show here that chronic treatment with high doses of either Hedgehog, Wnt or Notch inhibitors induce depletion of Lgr5-positive intestinal stem cells. In contrast, low doses of morphogen inhibitors with only partial inhibition of the respective pathway did not decrease the number of pluripotent intestinal stem cells and was not limited by other adverse events. The tolerability of combination therapies may be explained by the distinct functions of morphogen pathways in stem cell maintenance and their activation at different compartments. Wnt and Notch pathways stimulate predominantly proliferation of stem cells at the bottom of the crypt, whereas Hedgehog signalling regulates differentiation of stem cells as they migrate upwards the crypts.17
We also demonstrate for the first time that combined inhibition of morphogen pathways exerts additive antifibrotic effects in two mouse models of skin fibrosis, one resembling inflammatory subsets of patients and the other one mimicking non-inflammatory stages. The additive antifibrotic effects were observed in preventive as well as in therapeutic settings. Simultaneous inhibition of Hedgehog/Wnt or Hedgehog/Notch signalling decreased dermal thickening, collagen accumulation and myofibroblast differentiation more effectively than monotherapies. Combination therapies with low doses of morphogen inhibitors were as potent as monotherapies with high doses.
Together, our data suggest that combinations of morphogen inhibitors are effective in murine models of SSc, and that their use may, in contrast with high dose monotherapies, not be limited by stem cell depletion. Although these data are encouraging, additional studies are needed to further characterise the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapies. (1) Despite absence of clinical tolerability, healthy microscopic architecture of the gut and normal numbers of Lgr5 positive stem cells, we cannot exclude that combined inhibition of morphogen pathways may affect particular subsets of stem cells in the intestine or in other organs. (2) The effect of combination therapies on other manifestations of SSc such as vascular diseases demands particular attention. (3) The interaction of Hedgehog, Wnt or Notch pathways is generally not well understood and may depend on the cellular context. Thus, further studies are required to characterise the interaction of different morphogen pathways in SSc.
Acknowledgments
We thank Regina Kleinlein, Monica Pascuale Mate and Katja Dreißigacker for excellent technical assistance.
References
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data supplement 1 - Online figure
Footnotes
Handling editor Tore K Kvien
AD, VL and TDV contributed equally.
-
Contributors Design of the study: AD, TDV, VL, JHWD; Acquisition of data: AD, VL, TDV, JH, YZ, CB, KP-Z; Interpretation of data: AD, VL, TDV, OD, GS, JHWD; Manuscript preparation: AD, VL, OD, GS, JHWD.
-
Funding Grants DI 1537/4-1, DI 1537/5-1, DI 1537/7-1, DI 1537/9-1, BE 5191/1-1, AK 144/1-1 and SCHE 1583/7-1 of the Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft, grants A40 and J29 of the IZKF in Erlangen, the ELAN-Program of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, the Wilhelm-Sander-Foundation and the Career Support Award of Medicine of the Ernst Jung Foundation.
-
Competing interests OD has consultancy relationships and/or has received research funding from Actelion, Pfizer, Ergonex, BMS, Sanofi-Aventis, United BioSource Corporation, Medac, Biovitrium, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, 4D Science and Active Biotec in the area of potential treatments of scleroderma; JHWD has consultancy relationships and/or has received research funding from Actelion, Pfizer, Ergonex, BMS, Celgene, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, JB Therapeutics, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Array Biopharma and Active Biotec in the area of potential treatments of scleroderma and is stock owner of 4D Science GmbH.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.