Responses

Extended report
Comparison of the American-European Consensus Group Sjögren's syndrome classification criteria to newly proposed American College of Rheumatology criteria in a large, carefully characterised sicca cohort
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    The classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: issues for their improvement from the study of a large Italian cohort of patients
    • Luca Quartuccio, MD, PhD, Clinical Researcher
    • Other Contributors:
      • Chiara Baldini, Roberta Priori, Elena Bartoloni, Francesco Carubbi, Roberto Giacomelli, Roberto Gerli, Guido Valesini, Salvatore De Vita, Stefano Bombardieri

    Dear Editor,

    we read with great interest the article by Rasmussen et al. [1] which compared the performance of the new ACR [2] and the AECG [3] classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome (SS) showing that they led to similar results when applied to a well-characterized cohort of patients with sicca symptoms. More specifically, no clear evidence for an increased value of the new ACR criteria [2] over the old AEC...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.