Article Text

Download PDFPDF
AB0166 Methotrexate dose and outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
  1. C.-B. Choi1,2,
  2. Y.-K. Sung1,2,
  3. S.-K. Cho1,2,
  4. D.-H. Yoo2,
  5. S.-S. Lee3,
  6. J. Lee4,
  7. J. Kim5,
  8. H.-S. Lee6,
  9. T.-H. Kim2,
  10. B. Y. Yoon7,
  11. W.-H. Yoo8,
  12. J.-Y. Choe9,
  13. S.-H. Lee10,
  14. S.-C. Shim11,
  15. W.-T. Chung12,
  16. S.-J. Hong13,
  17. C. K. Lee14,
  18. E. Koh15,
  19. J.-B. Jun2,
  20. S.-Y. Bang6,
  21. S.-K. Kim9,
  22. H.-S. Cha15,
  23. J. Shim1,
  24. S.-C. Bae1,2
  1. 1Clinical Research Center for Rheumatoid Arthritis
  2. 2Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital For Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul
  3. 3Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju
  4. 4Rheumatology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul
  5. 5Rheumatology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju
  6. 6Rheumatology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri
  7. 7Rheumatology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang
  8. 8Rheumatology, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju
  9. 9Rheumatology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu
  10. 10Rheumatology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul
  11. 11Rheumatology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon
  12. 12Rheumatology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan
  13. 13Rheumatology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul
  14. 14Rheumatology, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu
  15. 15Rheumatology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic Of


Background Methotrexate (MTX) is well known as the anchor drug for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is recommended that MTX should be administered as soon as the diagnosis of RA is made and the dose should be escalated to tolerable adequate higher dose.

Objectives We aimed to investigate the difference in outcomes according to the weekly dose of MTX.

Methods A total of 4,393 patients enrolled in KORONA (Korean Observational Study Network for Arthritis), after excluding 973 patients who were not receiving MTX and 10 patients with inadequate information on their MTX dosage, were assessed for demographic factors, disease outcome measurements (DAS28, HAQ, EQ-5D, fatigue, sleep, pain, general condition, radiographic damage, surgery), comorbidities, medication, and adverse events. A total of 4,361 patients were assessed for outcomes according to MTX dose in relation to body weight after excluding 32 patients with body weight data missing. Patients receiving more or less than 10mg weekly dose of MTX were compared. In patients receiving more than 10mg weekly dose of MTX, patients with more or less than 0.25mg/kg were compared and in those receiving less than 10mg weekly, 0.16mg/kg was the cut-off for comparison.

Results More patients were receiving more than 10mg weekly dose of MTX (62.4%) compared to less than 10mg (37.6%). Patients in the more than 10mg weekly dose group were younger (p<0.01), had shorter disease duration (p<0.01), better general condition (p<0.01), had less hypertension (p<0.01) and other cardiovascular comorbidities (p<0.01), received more steroids (p<0.01) and NSAIDs (p<0.01), and had more radiographic damage at diagnosis and follow up (p<0.01) and surgery (p<0.01). When weekly MTX dose more or less than 0.25mg/kg were compared in the more than 10mg weekly group, the more than 0.25mg/kg group were more female (p<0.01), younger (p<0.01), longer disease duration (p<0.01), higher HAQ score (p<0.01), more pain (p<0.01), lower EQ-5D score (p<0.01), higher DAS28 (p<0.01), less hypertension (p<0.01), other cardiovascular (p<0.01), and gastrointestinal comorbidities (p<0.01), more radiographic damage at diagnosis (p<0.01) and follow up (p<0.01), and more surgery (p<0.01).

Conclusions Higher doses of MTX were used in younger patients with worse prognostic factors at diagnosis. The high-dose group had significantly higher disease activity, more pain, higher HAQ score, lower EQ-5D score, more radiographic damage and surgery, and more gastrointestinal comorbidities. But they had significantly less hypertension and other cardiovascular comorbidities, showed no significant difference in interstitial lung disease and adverse events.

Acknowledgements This study is supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A102065).

Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.