Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Anaemia to predict radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis
  1. Hanna W van Steenbergen,
  2. Jessica A B van Nies,
  3. Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
  1. Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Hanna W van Steenbergen, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, C1-R-046, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, RC Leiden 2300, The Netherlands; h.w.van_steenbergen{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The severity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is highly variable between patients and currently known risk factors explain only part of this variance.1 Much research is dedicated to identify additional new risk factors. Such factors may shed light on the processes underlying progression of RA and many risk factors together may enable risk stratification and individualised treatment of RA.

With interest we read the study by Möller et al,2 showing that patients with RA with anaemia have more severe radiological progression. Although anaemia in RA is generally considered to be a consequence of chronic inflammation, this recent study based on patients with RA included in the Swiss SCQM-database- observed that the association between anaemia and joint damage was independent of the association between disease activity (measured with the Disease Activity Score including the 28-swollen joint count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28ESR) and clinical Disease Activity Index (cDAI)) and joint damage. This led to the presumptions that anaemia in RA captures disease processes that are unmeasured …

View Full Text


  • Contributors HvS and JvN acquired and analysed the data. HvS, JvN and AvdHvM interpreted the data and drafted the article.

  • Funding This work was supported by a Vidi-grant of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics committee of the participating centre.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.