Article Text

SAT0411 A spondyloarthritis research consortium of canada (SPARCC)-score cut-off ≥3 as best match for the ASAS definition of a positive MRI of the sacroiliac joints
  1. R. van den Berg1,
  2. M. de Hooge2,
  3. V. Navarro-Compán1,
  4. M. Reijnierse3,
  5. F. van Gaalen1,
  6. T. Huizinga1,
  7. D. van der Heijde1
  1. 1Rheumatology, LUMC
  2. 2Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center
  3. 3Radiology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands


Background The definition of a “positive” or “negative” MRI of the SIJ-joints (MRI-SIJ) according to ASAS is recommended for use in daily practice1. However, in several clinical trials the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC)-score is used2. It would be useful to know which SPARCC-score is the best cut-off value as surrogate for the ASAS definition.

Objectives To investigate which SPARCC cut-off value best matches the ASAS definition for a positive MRI-SIJ.

Methods All MRI-SIJs of two time points of patients included in the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early (SPACE)-cohort in the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) were scored independently by 3 readers. The readers, blinded to the time sequence, scored the MRI-SIJs according to the ASAS definition (ASAS-pos) and the SPARCC-score. An MRI-SIJ was marked ASAS-pos if 2/3 readers scored positive. In this analysis, mean SPARCC-scores of the readers that also scored ASAS-pos for that particular case were used. Cross-tabs were used to analyse agreement between several SPARCC-score cut-off values (≥1, ≥2, ≥3 and ≥4) and ASAS-pos, which served as gold standard in this comparison.

Results All available MRI-SIJs were used (n=238 in total; n=148 baseline MRI-SIJs; n=90 follow-up MRI-SIJs). The results of the different tested SPARCC cut-off values are presented in the table. A SPARCC cut-off value ≥2 resulted in 11 (4.6%) false-positive classifications and no false-negative classifications compared to ASAS-pos, while a cut-off of ≥4 resulted in 9 (3.8%) false-negative and 1 (0.4%) false-positive classifications. A SPARCC cut-off value ≥3 resulted in 1 (0.4%) false-positive classification and 4 (1.7%) false-negative classifications. We found very similar results if baseline MRI-SIJs and follow-up MRI-SIJs were analysed separately.

Conclusions SPARCC cut-off values of ≥2, ≥3 or ≥4 have all high percentages of correctly classified patients (95.4%, 97.9% and 95.8%, respectively). A SPARCC cut-off value ≥3 shows most balanced misclassification and the highest agreement with the ASAS definition for positive MRI-SIJ.

  1. Rudwaleit M et al. ARD 2009;68:1520-7.

  2. Maksymowych W. A&R 2005;53:703-9

Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.