Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Updated meta-analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer rates reported from prospective observational studies in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors
  1. Xavier Mariette1,
  2. Alan Vaughan Reynolds2,
  3. Paul Emery3
  1. 1Service de Rhumatologie, Université Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
  2. 2Reynolds Clinical Sciences Ltd, Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK
  3. 3Section of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Xavier Mariette, Service de Rhumatologie, Le Kremlin Bicetre 94275, France; xavier.mariette{at}bct.aphp.fr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We recently published a meta-analysis of malignancy rates reported from prospective observational studies in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-I).1 While there was no increase in the rates of all-site malignancy or lymphoma, there was an increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) (1.45, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.76).

The skin cancer analysis included data from an abstract from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR)2 that has since been published as a full paper with different estimates.3 In the BSRBR abstract, the adjusted HR in comparison with a control cohort of patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, without a prior NMSC, was 1.7 (95% CI 0.9 to  3.4).2 The updated analysis provided separate estimates for basal cell carcinoma (HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.71)) and squamous cell carcinoma (HR 1.16 (95% CI 0.35 to  3.84)).3

Since the updated results were substantially lower than the value reported in the BSRBR abstract, we revised our analysis to include the updated data, to investigate whether our original conclusions regarding the increased risk of skin cancer could be sustained.

In our revised analysis, the pooled risk estimate for NMSC in patients treated with TNF-I was 1.33 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.60) (figure 1).

Figure 1

Risk estimate of non-melanoma skin cancer reported in prospective observational studies of patients treated with TNF inhibitors.

Therefore, the revised analysis is consistent with our original conclusion that treatment with TNF-I increases the risk of NMSC; although, the lower CI bound is only just above 1.0. These revised results are still aligned with a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials across indications; although, here the increased risk of NMSC was twofold (RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.11 to 3.95).4

Direct random effects meta-analyses were conducted in a frequentist framework using Stata V.11. The level of heterogeneity was determined using the I2 statistic.

References

Footnotes

  • Competing interests XM has received research grants or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer and Roche; AR was an employee of Wyeth Europa and had held shares in Wyeth and currently has Pfizer share options, and has undertaken consultancy work for UCB Pharma and Pfizer; PE has received research grants or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer and Roche. This work was undertaken without external funding.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Xavier Mariette, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Karel Pavelka, Peter Taylor, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Rebecca Heatley, Claire Walsh, Richard Lawson, Alan Vaughan Reynolds, Paul Emery