Objectives Peptide-based immune tolerance induction is considered an attractive treatment option for autoimmune diseases. The authors have developed a novel method that can enhance the induction of protective peptide-specific T-cell responses, using a rat arthritis model. The authors focused on the Toll-like receptor 9 ligand CpG, which was shown to stimulate regulatory T-cell proliferation when added to plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) using in-vitro cultures.
Methods The peptide used is a heat shock protein 60 epitope (p1) that elicits tolerogenic peptide-specific immune responses in human arthritis patients and was recently shown to have protective capacity as a bystander antigen in the rat adjuvant arthritis model. Rats were treated with three nasal doses of p1, CpG or a combination of p1 and CpG. Antigen-presenting cells were studied in nose-draining lymph nodes (mandibular lymph nodes; MLN) after nasal treatment, and T-cell responses were analysed in joint-draining lymph nodes after arthritis induction.
Results Nasal co-administration of p1/CpG significantly augmented the arthritis-protective effect of p1, while CpG treatment alone did not. Co-treatment of p1/CpG increased both the number and activation status of pDC in draining MLN, which was accompanied by amplified p1-specific T-cell proliferation and interleukin (IL)-10 production. During early arthritis, p1-specific IL-10 production was identified at the site of inflammation. P1 and p1/CpG-treated rats showed a greater amount of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in the joint-draining lymph nodes, which correlated with lower arthritis scores.
Conclusions These clinical and immunological data suggest the use of CpG as a potent adjuvant for mucosal peptide-specific immune therapy in arthritis.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, 5th European Framework Program, Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Foundation.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.