Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Protein array screening reveals IgA autoantigenicity patterns predicting anti-TNFα therapy response in rheumatoid arthritis patients
  1. Zoltán Konthur1,
  2. Katja Köpke2,
  3. Annette Poch-Hasnek1,
  4. Katja Köpke2,
  5. Hans Lehrach1,
  6. Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester2,
  7. Karl Skriner2
  1. 1Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
  2. 2Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Humboldt University and Free University, Berlin, Germany


Background One third of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biologicals targeting tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) are therapy non-responders. The authors investigated the differences in seroreactivity of patients responding and not responding to TNF therapies prior and after therapy to deduce diagnostically applicable autoantigenicity patterns.

Methods Screening with patient sera were conducted on protein macroarrays consisting of 37.830 unique putative expression clones. Response patterns of different Ig classes were recorded and bioinformatically evaluated enabling them to deduce a set of proteins, which allow to distinguish between therapy responders and non-responders. Next, selected candidates were expressed recombinantly in Escherichia coli, purified and further stratified with larger patient cohort in ELISA responder group.

Results Comparative analysis of macroarray results with sera from responders and non-responders to anti-TNF drug revealed a more than 30-fold higher number of autoantigens targeted by high titres of IgA autoantibodies in non-responders compared to responders (221 vs 6). More detailed analyses suggest that with five autoantigens found to be common in all individual non-responders to anti-TNFα treatment, a reduced number of antigens might be sufficient to predict non-responsiveness. Pretreatment sera from patients with diagnosis of RA based on the ACR classification criteria who were initiated on therapy with TNFα inhibitors were analysed with three markers from the biomarker set of highest priority (RAB11B, PPP2R1A, KPNB1) using an ELISAs assay. In total, analyses of 69 patients were carried out, of which 13 were clearly defined as Responder and 8 were clearly defined as non-responder. Of these, already 5 (62.5%) non-responders could clearly be identified with already three markers from biomarker set of highest priority (RAB11B, PPP2R1A, KPNB1). None of the Responder or Intermediate Responder gave any signal on said markers on IgA-level. The remaining 48 patient samples are derived prior treatment with anti-TNFα inhibitors and were blinded. According to published studies, 20–25% of RA patients treated with TNFα inhibitors are non-responders: Hence the authors expect ∼10 patients to be non-responder. Within this set, five patients (50%) showed clear IgA response to three markers from biomarker set of highest priority (RAB11B, PPP2R1A, KPNB1). Furthermore, with five autoantigens common in all individual non-responders to anti-TNFα treatment, a reduced number of antigens may be sufficient to predict non-responsiveness.

Conclusion These data suggest that non-response to anti-TNFα biologicals might be predicted based on frequency and magnitude of autoantibodies of the IgA class IgA-producing mucosal B cells might be important for disease persistence in anti-TNFα non-responders.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.