Background: It is known that onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is increased post partum.
Objective: To compare incidence rates between RA and other chronic arthritides (OCA) 0–24 months after delivery, and to compare the incidence rates within each group 0–24 versus 25–48 months post partum.
Methods: Premenopausal women from a Norwegian patient register were linked with the Medical Birth Registry of Norway to study the interval between delivery and time of diagnosis. Cox regression analysis with adjustments for age at delivery and birth order was applied to compare proportions of incident cases of RA and OCA with onset 0–24 months post partum. Poisson regression analysis with adjustment for the population at risk was applied to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0–24 versus 25–48 months post partum.
Results: Of 183 RA and 110 patients with OCA diagnosed after delivery, 69 (37.7%) had RA and 31 (28.2%) OCA during the first 24 months post partum (p = 0.09). The IRR (95% CI) for diagnosis during 0–24 months versus 25–48 months was 1.73 (1.11 to 2.70) (p = 0.01) for RA, 1.05 (0.59 to 1.84) (p = 0.86) for OCA. The IRR was 2.23 (1.06 to 4.70) and 1.87 (0.67 to 5.21), respectively, when only considering diagnoses after the first pregnancy. Clinical characteristics were similar within each diagnostic group.
Conclusion: The proportions of incident cases with onset 0–24 months after delivery were not different between RA and OCA. A peak in incidence during 0–24 months was seen in the RA group, both when considering all pregnancies and only the first pregnancy.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Funding Research grants for the NOR-DMARD register have been received from Abbott, Amgen, Aventis, BMS, MSD, Roche, Schering-Plough/Centocor, Wyeth and the Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Affairs. This actual work was supported by the liaison committee between the Central Norway Regional Health Authority (RHA) and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
Competing interests Hans Bijlsma was the Handling Editor for this article.
Ethics approval Approval from the regional ethic committee of Central Norway.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.