Objectives: Although lumbar spondylosis is a major cause of low back pain and disability in elderly people, few epidemiological studies have been performed. The prevalence of radiographic lumbar spondylosis was investigated in a large-scale population study and the association with low back pain was examined.
Methods: From a nationwide cohort study (Research on Osteoarthritis Against Disability; ROAD), 2288 participants aged ⩾60 years (818 men and 1470 women) living in urban, mountainous and coastal communities were analysed. The radiographic severity at lumbar intervertebral levels from L1/2 to L5/S was determined by Kellgren/Lawrence (KL) grading.
Results: In the overall population the prevalence of radiographic spondylosis with KL⩾2 and ⩾3 at the severest intervertebral level was 75.8% and 50.4%, respectively, and that of low back pain was 28.8%. Although KL⩾2 spondylosis was more prevalent in men, KL⩾3 spondylosis and low back pain were more prevalent in women. Age and body mass index were risk factors for both KL ⩾2 and KL⩾3 spondylosis. Although KL = 2 spondylosis was not significantly associated with low back pain compared with KL = 0 or 1, KL⩾3 spondylosis was related to the pain only in women.
Conclusions: This cross-sectional study in a large population revealed a high prevalence of radiographic lumbar spondylosis in elderly subjects. Gender seems to be distinctly associated with KL⩾2 and KL⩾3 lumbar spondylosis, and disc space narrowing with or without osteophytosis in women may be a risk factor for low back pain.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
▸ Additional data are published online only at http://ard.bmj.com/content/vol68/issue9
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was conducted with approval of the ethical committees of the University of Tokyo and the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology.