Responses

Download PDFPDF

Recommendations for the content and conduct of European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) musculoskeletal ultrasound courses
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    On the feasability of formal musculoskeletal ultrasonography training for rheumatologists

    Dear Sir,

    Over the past decade musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSU) has recognised a growing interest among rheumatologists. Cumulating evidence demonstrating the benefit of performing MSU for both patients and rheumatologists has further increased the interest in this imaging modality (1,2). However, although MSU is a fast expanding area in rheumatology, there is still not much information on crucial issues like training...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.