Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Prevalence and risk factors of discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and hip bone densitometry
  1. Abdellah El Maghraoui,
  2. Davy A Mouinga Abayi,
  3. Imad Ghozlani,
  4. Aziza Mounach,
  5. Abderrazak Nouijai,
  6. Mirieme Ghazi,
  7. Lahsen Achemlal,
  8. Ahmed Bezza
  1. Rheumatology and Physical Rehabilitation Department, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor A El Maghraoui
    Rheumatology and Physical Rehabilitation Department, Military Hospital Mohammed V, PO Box 1018, Rabat, Morocco; a_elmaghraoui{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Dual x ray absorptiometry is the reference method to measure bone mineral density (BMD) accurately and reproducibly. The World Health Organization defines osteoporosis on the basis of the T score (which is the difference between the measured BMD and the mean value of young adults, expressed in standard deviations for a normative population of the same ethnicity).1 Although the BMD at different anatomical regions is correlated, the agreement between sites is low when it comes to classifying individual subjects as having osteoporosis.2 Various studies have analysed the prevalence and effect of T score discordance on the management of osteoporosis.3–,7 However, most of these studies did not evaluate risk factors for this phenomenon. …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Published Online First 23 October 2006