Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Macrophages overloaded with tissue debris in Wegener’s granulomatosis
  1. Z Mackiewicz1,
  2. A Rimkevičius1,
  3. J Petersen2,
  4. C B Andersen3,
  5. E Dudek4,
  6. M Vytrasova5,
  7. Y T Konttinen6
  1. 1Department of Pathology, Vilnius University Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Lithuania
  2. 2Laboratory of Rheumatology, The Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Pathology, The Laboratory Centre, Rigshospitalet National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  4. 4Department of Cell Biology, University of Opole, Poland
  5. 5III. Department of Internal Medicine of Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
  6. 6Department of Medicine/invärtes medicin, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, ORTON Orthopaedic Hospital of the Invalid Foundation, Helsinki, and COXA Hospital for the Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor Y T Konttinen
    Department of Medicine/invärtes medicin, PO Box 700 (Haartmaninkatu 8), FI-00029 Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; yrjo.konttinenhelsinki.fi

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse some scavenging related molecules in Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG) macrophages.

Methods: Immunohistochemical staining of lung, nasopharynx, and skin for macrophage markers related to scavenging (macrophage scavenger receptor MARCO, collagenase-1 and gelatinase-B), formation of multinuclear foreign body giant cells (ADAM 9/meltrin-γ and ADAM 12/meltrin-α), and cell debris derived from neutrophils, endothelial cells and mast cells (specific granule protein 28 (SGP28), von Willebrand factor (vWF) and mast cell tryptase, respectively). TechMate staining robot and biotin-streptavidin protocol were used.

Results: Some macrophages were activated and expressed collagenase-1 and gelatinase-B. Approximately 5% of macrophages expressed scavenger receptor, whereas 20–30% were meltrin positive. Interstitial and granuloma associated macrophages and giant cells contained partly undigested, immunoreactive SGP28-, vWF- and tryptase-positive cell rests and collagenous matrix. Lymphocytic follicles with germinal centres were found in the same areas.

Conclusion: In WG tissue lesions macrophage and giant cells seem to be overwhelmed by the bulk to be scavenged. Despite cellular activation and continuing maturation to professional scavenger receptor (MARCO) and meltrin positive multinuclear giant cells combined with an organisation into granulomas, macrophages still contain partially undigested cell and tissue rests. This necrotic and damaged self may be the driving force for the formation of giant cell (“foreign body”) granulomas. This, together with the local formation of secondary lymphatic follicles (with germinal centres), indicates active local antigen processing and presentation.

  • ADAM 9 and ADAM 12, transmembrane proteins of the zinc protease superfamily
  • cANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies
  • MARCO, macrophage scavenge receptor
  • MCT, mast cell tryptase
  • MMP, matrix metalloproteinase
  • PR3, proteinase 3
  • SGP28, specific granule protein
  • vWF, von Willebrand factor
  • WG, Wegener’s granulomatosis
  • Wegener’s granulomatosis
  • macrophages

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG) is a systemic disease of unknown origin characterised by a necrotising, granulomatous vasculitis clinically affecting the upper airways, lungs, and kidneys. Blood vessel damage is probably immunologically mediated, perhaps triggered by Staphylococcus aureus and/or endogenous proteinase 3 (PR3) autoantigen in genetically predisposed subjects.1,2 Some infectious conditions, especially the necrotising inflammatory processes caused by certain fungi and bacteria, can lead to granulomatous vasculitis and can be confused with Wegener’s granulomatosis.3 Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (cANCA), primarily directed to PR3, are clinically useful markers for WG.4 Reactive oxygen species occurring in inflamed areas are important triggers of apoptosis.5 PR3-ANCA induces increased adherence of neutrophils to endothelium,6 causing massive localised endothelial damage. The subsequent fate of the dead neutrophils and endothelial cells in cANCA associated vasculitis is unknown.

WG is associated with relatively massive local cell and tissue necrosis. However, it seems possible that the capacity of macrophages to act as local scavengers may not be sufficient or may be aberrant in WG. In this study we analysed several markers of local resident and immigrant cells to examine the scavenging function of macrophages.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

Samples were obtained from granulomatous lung tissue from three patients (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark) and skin and upper respiratory tract mucosa from four other patients (Red Cross Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania). All patients had systemic WG vasculitis with lung and kidney lesions. The diagnosis was based on history, physical examination, histological findings, and laboratory tests, including PR3-ANCA/cANCA. Patients from Copenhagen with lung disease had PR3 antibodies. Patients from Vilnius were not tested for PR3 antibodies as the test is not yet available. All patients fulfilled the criteria for, and definition of, WG according to the American College of Rheumatology.

Three patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and two patients with non-small cell lung cancer served as comparators.

Primary antibodies

The primary antibodies used were monoclonal mouse antihuman CD68 IgG1/κ (recognising the KP1 epitope) for macrophages, DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark, 1 μg/ml; rabbit antihuman macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) IgG (a gift from Timo Pikkarainen, Karolinska Institutet, Institutionen for medicinsk biokemi och biofysik, Stockholm, Sweden) for macrophage scavenger receptor, 5 μg/ml7; monoclonal mouse antihuman matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) IgG2a/κ, CHEMICON International, Temecula, CA, USA, for collagenase-1 (“fibroblast collagenase”), 2 μg/ml; monoclonal mouse antihuman MMP-9, IgG1/κ, CHEMICON, for gelatinase B or 92 kDa type IV collagenase, 2 μg/ml; peptide affinity purified polyclonal rabbit antihuman ADAM 9 IgG (meltrin-γ, MDC9), Triple Point Biologics, Inc, Portland, OR, USA, 1 μg/ml; affinity purified goat polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide mapping within an internal region of ADAM 12 (meltrin-α) of human origin, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 2 μg/ml; rabbit antihuman specific granule protein 28 (SGP28)/CRISP-3, a matrix glycoprotein found in specific granules of human neutrophils (a gift from Lene Udby, Granulocyte Research Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), 1.7 μg/ml8; rabbit antihuman von Willebrand Factor (vWF), purified immunoglobulin fraction, DAKO, for endothelial cells, 1 μg/ml; monoclonal mouse antihuman mast cell tryptase, DAKO, IgG1/κ, for mast cells, 0.25 μg/ml; monoclonal mouse antihuman fibroblasts IgG1/κ, DAKO, 1.5 μg/ml.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin sections (5 μm) were mounted on DAKO capillary slides (TechMate, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), deparaffinised, processed for antigen retrieval in a microwave processing labstation (MicroMED T/T Mega Histoprocessing Labstation, Milestone Inc, Atlanta, USA), washed in phosphate buffered saline, and immunostained automatically in the robot (TechMate, DAKO) at 22°C using the manufacturer’s protocol and kit of reagents.

Semiquantitative microscopic assessment of immunohistochemical staining was performed under ×400 magnification (high power field) using four grades: –  =  no immunoreactivity; ±  =  only a few immunoreactive profiles; +  =  some immunoreactive profiles; ++  =  many immunoreactive profiles. Stained cells were counted in 10 randomly selected fields.

RESULTS

General histopathology

The lung and nasopharyngeal tissues showed necrotising and leucocytoclastic vasculitis with massive neutrophil diapedesis and tissue infiltration associated with granulomas (table 1).

Table 1

 Histopathological findings in patients with WG

In some areas no granulomas, but only remarkable mixed inflammatory perivascular cell infiltrates with small focal zones of necrosis, heavy neutrophil infiltration, and nuclear dust were present in lung and nasopharyngeal specimens.

Scattered mast cells, neutrophils, and occasional eosinophils were present. In the skin specimens no typical granulomas were found (table 1). Only necrotising vasculitis with moderate inflammatory cell infiltration and small intraepithelial vesicles were seen.

Immunohistochemical findings

CD68+ macrophages were present throughout the granulomatous inflammatory tissue (figs 1A and B). Large accumulations of macrophages were always present in the lumina of alveoli. Some of the macrophages were positive for the scavenger receptor MARCO, meltrin-γ, meltrin-α, collagenase-1, and gelatinase-B. About 5% of macrophages were scavenger receptor positive and 20% meltrin positive. Also, some of the blood vessels stained for meltrin-α (table 2). Intense meltrin-α and -γ immunoreactivity was seen in some multinuclear giant cells. SGP28 was detected in neutrophils and in lung and tissue macrophages (figs 1C and D), which sometimes was associated with engulfed but not completely digested neutrophils. vWF immunostaining was found in endothelial cells. Perivascular vWF deposits were conspicuous. vWF staining was also seen in some lung and tissue macrophages (figs 1E and F). Mast cells contained apparently granular mast cell tryptase in their cytoplasm. Tryptase was also found in pericellular connective tissue matrix throughout the inflamed areas. Some macrophages also stained for mast cell tryptase (figs 1G and H), which was occasionally associated with apparently engulfed mast cell remnants in macrophages.

Table 2

 Immunohistochemical findings related to macrophage functions in patients with WG

Figure 1

 Immunohistochemical characteristics of scavenging macrophages in a WG lung. (A) Abundant clustered and sparse CD68+ macrophages (arrows) in WG. Original magnification ×100. (B) The same, ×400. (C) SGP28 positive neutrophils, multinuclear cells (arrows) and macrophages, ×100. (D) The same: (multinuclear cells marked with arrowheads, neutrophils marked with arrows), ×400. (E) vWF in damaged endothelial cells and macrophages (arrows), ×100. (F) The same, ×400. (G) Tryptase in mast cells (arrowheads) and macrophages (arrows), ×100. (H) The same, ×400.

Strong immunoreactivity of collagenase-1 and gelatinase B was found in almost all fibroblast-like cells in fibrotic areas. Negative control stainings confirmed the specificity of staining.

Comparative samples

In patients without WG lung tissue, cellular infiltrates consisted of neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, lymphocytes, mast cells and, occasionally, eosinophils and plasma cells. In patients with lung carcinoma tumour cell, infiltration was present. No SGP28-, vWF- or mast cell tryptase-positive macrophages were found in these controls.

DISCUSSION

When the concept of extravascular, intra-articular immune complex disease was introduced in rheumatoid arthritis, it was noticed that rheumatoid synovial fluid contained so called rheumatoid arthritis cells, also known as rhagocytes. They were neutrophils which stained for immunoglobulin, and this despite the fact that it was well known that neutrophils themselves do not produce immunoglobulins. Later, it was shown that neutrophils isolated from rheumatoid synovial tissue also stain for immunoglobulin, probably as a result of in vivo or ex vivo phagocytosis.9 It is not known for how long phagocytosed material retains its immunoreactivity, but apparently, in a continuing process, at least long enough for even professional phagocytic and highly hydrolytic cells to stain for exogenous, phagocytosed antigens. We now demonstrate that another professional phagocyte, the macrophage, also stains for antigens apparently consisting of cell-specific markers, which are not normally produced by resting or activated macrophages. These findings are in accordance with the observations of Moosig and coworkers, for example, which suggest induction of inflammatory responses and costimulatory molecules by the uptake of apoptotic material.10

The stimulus leading to the formation of multinuclear giant cells and granulomas in WG is unknown. The observation of MARCO scavenger receptor and fusion molecules meltrin-α (ADAM 12) and meltrin-γ (ADAM 9), now demonstrated for the first time in WG, suggests that for one or another reason, local tissue macrophages are driven to prefusion cells and foreign body giant cells. In the absence of any exogenous foreign bodies or evidence for microbes able to induce such a response, it seems safe to conclude that the overwhelming production of endogenous tissue debris may act as an inducing stimulus. However, the specificity of the findings for WG and their relevance for the immunopathogenesis of this disease can be questioned.

Macrophages can scavenge apoptotic cells without activation of the immune response against potential antigens in such debris. In WG both local neutrophils and mast cells showed signs of degranulation and activation in the form of release of their cytoplasmic contents into extracellular space. This leads to weak cytoplasmic staining (pale cells or “ghost cells”), combined with pericellular deposition of both SGP28 and mast cell tryptase. We conclude that the overwhelming production of endogenous cellular and tissue debris in a highly hydrolytic environment may contribute to loss of tolerance to self antigens, such as PR3.11–,14 This would be compatible with the high debris load and overfed macrophages (as observed in the present study), which were topologically colocalised with primary and secondary lymphatic follicles with germinal centres. Granulomatosis lesions develop in a sequential mode, leading to Th1 dominated lesions in WG.13 Thus, there are differences in biopsy findings between localised and generalised forms of the disease.14

An impaired ability of macrophages to clear apoptotic neutrophils in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus has recently been described.15

REFERENCES