Responses

Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Minimal clinical important difference

    Dear Editor,

    I am currently enrolled as a Physical Therapy doctorate student. I have an ongoing project that involves the MCID of Shoulder questionnaires. I found your study to be the best information yet in determining such data. I tried to ascertain the two tables W1 and w3 (interpretative data) so as to disect the MCID for the SPADI and DASH outcome tools. The Journal supplemental's web site did not allow that...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.