You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Extended report
The German etanercept registry for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  1. G Horneff1,
  2. H Schmeling1,
  3. T Biedermann2,
  4. I Foeldvari3,
  5. G Ganser4,
  6. H J Girschick5,
  7. T Hospach6,
  8. H I Huppertz7,
  9. R Keitzer8,
  10. R M Küster9,
  11. H Michels10,
  12. D Moebius11,
  13. B Rogalski12,
  14. A Thon13,
  15. for the Paediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Group
  1. 1Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
  2. 2Department of Paediatrics, Helios Clinic, Berlin-Buch, Germany
  3. 3Paediatric Rheumatology Clinic, AK Eilbeck, Hamburg, Germany
  4. 4Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, North West Germany Centre of Rheumatology St Josef Stift, Sendenhorst, Germany
  5. 5Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre, Würzburg, Germany
  6. 6Olga’s Children’s Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
  7. 7Prof-Hess-Paediatric Clinic, Bremen, Germany
  8. 8Department of Paediatrics, Charité, Berlin, Germany
  9. 9Children’s Rheumatology Clinic, Bad-Bramstedt, Germany
  10. 10Children’s Rheumatology Clinic, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
  11. 11Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Carl-Thiem Hospital, Cottbus, Germany
  12. 12Children’s Rheumatology Clinic Neckargemünd, Germany
  13. 13Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre, Hannover, Germany
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Gerd Horneff
    Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre, 06120 Halle, Germany; gerd.horneffmedizin.uni-halle.de

Abstract

Objective: To describe a registry set up to monitor children treated with etanercept in Germany and Austria.

Methods: Giannini’s criteria, duration of morning stiffness, number of swollen, tender and contracted joints, adverse events, and reasons for discontinuation were assessed.

Results: 322 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and 12 additional patients with non-JIA rheumatic diagnoses were included. Therapeutic efficacy was observed from one month after treatment was started. The number of patients with significant improvement and the degree of improvement increased during the first year. The mean (SD) number of tender and swollen joints decreased from 9 (9) and 8.4 (9) to 3.0 (6.5) and 4.5 (7) after one month, and to 2.2 (5.5) and 3.3 (5.5) after three months; morning stiffness decreased from 45 (65) minutes to 12 (30) and 7 (19) after one and three months (p<0.001 for all). Using Gianinni’s criteria of 30%, 50%, and 70% improvement, a therapeutic response in JIA patients was achieved in, respectively, 66%, 54%, and 30% after one month, 78%, 61%, and 38% after three months, and 83%, 72%, and 52% after six months. Therapeutic efficacy was lower in patients with systemic onset arthritis. Overall tolerability was good: in 592 patient treatment-years there were 69 reports of adverse events in 56 patients, including one CNS demyelination. There were no opportunistic infections or lupus-like reactions. Treatment was discontinued in 53 JIA patients, in 25 because of lack of efficacy.

Conclusion: Etanercept treatment was safe and led to a significant improvement in most JIA patients resistant to conventional treatment.

  • CHAQ, child health assessment questionnaire
  • JIA, juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • LCOF, last observation carried forward
  • TNF, tumour necrosis factor
  • VAS, visual analogue scale
  • juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  • treatment
  • etanercept
  • tumour necrosis factor

https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.014886

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • The registry is supported by Wyeth-Pharma GmbH, Münster, Germany