Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Outcomes of a multicentre randomised clinical trial of etanercept to treat ankylosing spondylitis
Free
  1. A Calin1,
  2. B A C Dijkmans2,
  3. P Emery3,
  4. M Hakala4,
  5. J Kalden5,
  6. M Leirisalo-Repo6,
  7. E M Mola7,
  8. C Salvarani8,
  9. R Sanmartí9,
  10. J Sany10,
  11. J Sibilia11,
  12. J Sieper12,
  13. S van der Linden13,
  14. E Veys14,
  15. A M Appel15,
  16. S Fatenejad15
  1. 1Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Upper Borough Walls, Bath BA1 1RL, UK
  2. 2AZ Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
  4. 4Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, Heinola, Finland
  5. 5University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  6. 6Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  7. 7Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
  8. 8Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
  9. 9Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
  10. 10Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
  11. 11Hôpital Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
  12. 12University Hospital Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
  13. 13Academisch Ziekenhuis, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  14. 14UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium
  15. 15Wyeth Research, Collegeville, PA, USA
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr A Calin
    Holmpatrick, Weston Road, Bath BA1 2XU, UK; calinandreihotmail.com

Abstract

Objective: A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etanercept to treat adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods: Adult patients with AS at 14 European sites were randomly assigned to 25 mg injections of etanercept or placebo twice weekly for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was an improvement of at least 20% in patient reported symptoms, based on the multicomponent Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) response criteria (ASAS 20). Secondary end points included ASAS 50 and ASAS 70 responses and improved scores on individual components of ASAS, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), acute phase reactants, and spinal mobility tests. Safety was evaluated during scheduled visits.

Results: Of 84 patients enrolled, 45 received etanercept and 39 received placebo. Significantly more etanercept patients than placebo patients responded at the ASAS 20 level as early as week 2, and sustained differences were evident up to week 12. Significantly more etanercept patients reported ASAS 50 responses at all times and ASAS 70 responses at weeks 2, 4, and 8; reported lower composite and fatigue BASDAI scores; had lower acute phase reactant levels; and had improved spinal flexion. Etanercept was well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild to moderate; the only between-group difference was injection site reactions, which occurred significantly more often in etanercept patients.

Conclusions: Etanercept is a well tolerated and effective treatment for reducing clinical symptoms and signs of AS.

  • AS, ankylosing spondylitis
  • ASAS, Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis
  • BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
  • BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index
  • CRP, C reactive protein
  • DMARDs, disease modifying antirheumatic drugs
  • ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate
  • NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • PsA, psoriatic arthritis
  • RA, rheumatoid arthritis
  • TNFα, tumour necrosis factor α
  • VAS, visual analogue scale
  • ankylosing spondylitis
  • etanercept
  • tumour necrosis factor inhibitors
  • biological treatment
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Presented in part at the Annual European Congress of Rheumatology in Lisbon, Portugal, June 2003.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.