Download PDFPDF

Physiotherapy or corticosteroid injection for shoulder pain?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Author's reply

    Dear Editor

    In this letter we would like to respond to the comments made by Frank Conijn to our leader.[1]

    Firstly, we are aware of the differences in the content of physiotherapy in the three trials at issue, and briefly mentioned this in our leader. The fact that passive mobilisations were not allowed in the trial by Winters et al.[2] may, indeed, partly explain the differences in effectiveness of...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    The Leader is biased

    Dear Editor

    The Leader [1] is an insufficiently objective reaction, and one that demonstrates rather little real-life insight from the authors.

    Insufficiently objective, because it strongly highlights the matter of the outcome measures, while it only slightly touches on the question: is the study by Winters et al,[2] one of the two other (Dutch) randomised studies they use for their substantiation, a valid...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.