<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com">
<title>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases current issue</title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com</link>
<description>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Jun  1 2013 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0003-4967</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e10?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e11?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e13?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/789?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/791?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/794?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/797?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/804?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/815?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/823?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/826?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/831?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/836?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/844?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/858?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/863?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/870?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/875?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/881?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/908?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/911?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/918?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/924?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/930?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/935?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/942?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/955?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/963?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/967?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/979?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/986?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/992?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1003?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1011?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1018?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1026?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1032?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1037?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1044?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1053?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1059?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1064?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1071?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1080?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1089?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1104?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1110?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1110-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://ard.bmj.com/site/homepage/ARD_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/site/homepage/ARD_95x60.gif">
<title>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases</title>
<url>http://ard.bmj.com/site/homepage/ARD_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e10?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erdheim-Chester disease]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e10?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec id="s1"> <p>We read with interest the excellent study published by Cavalli <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> in <I>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases</I> and wish to voice our concerns. Although heterogeneity is the rule in the clinical presentation of patients with Erdheim&ndash;Chester disease (ECD), some manifestations should be regarded as diagnostic triggers of this condition. The presence of unexpected interstitial lung disease on chest radiography, a coated aorta or &lsquo;hairy&rsquo; kidneys on abdominal CT scanning, an ocular proptosis of unknown aetiology, or a &lsquo;pseudotumoral&rsquo; infiltration of the right atrium detected on echocardiography should point to the diagnosis of ECD, especially if neuroendocrine axis manifestations are also present.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></p> <p>The data reported by the authors addressing the most frequent presentations at onset are of value. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that skeletal, constitutional symptoms or even neurological manifestations, in themselves, will lead to the diagnosis of ECD, given their lack of...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juanos-Iborra, M., Solanich-Moreno, J., Selva-O'Callaghan, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203519</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2013-203519</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Erdheim-Chester disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Electronic pages</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e10</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e11?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Which ultrasound method has the upper hand in the follow-up of the patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome?]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e11?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec id="s1"> <p>I read with great interest the study of different diagnostic ultrasound measures of median nerve volume in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by Dejaco <I>et al.</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> It is of great value, in my opinion, that this study succeeded in highlighting the diagnostic value and good reliability of ultrasound determination of median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) in patients with suspected CTS, and confirmed previously reported results on the value of Doppler ultrasonography in classifying the severity of CTS.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2&ndash;4</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref></p> <p>I would like though to draw attention to a subgroup of patients with persistent clinical and electrophysiological signs of CTS and condition after unsuccessful carpal tunnel release (CTR). The aetiology of the persistent neurological semiology is in most of the cases an incomplete release of the retinaculum flexorum. Traction neuropathy, real recurrent CTS and iatrogenic nerve lesions occur less frequently. Nerve...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerasnoudis, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203206</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2013-203206</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Which ultrasound method has the upper hand in the follow-up of the patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Electronic pages</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e11</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e11</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e12?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to comments in: Statin use is associated with reduced incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis in the Rotterdam study by Clockaerts et al]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e12?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We thank Clockaerts <I>et al</I> for their thoughtful commentary on our paper and will address a number of their comments. They expressed concern regarding lack of verification of our data related to statin use, duration of use and dosage, and indicated these data were based on self-report. While we acknowledged in our paper<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> that we did not have dosage data, the verification was that participants brought their medications with them during yearly follow-up visits and we were able to confirm that statins were prescribed for these patients. This approach was not as valid as a pill count but, in our view, is more rigorous than self-report.</p> <p>Clockaerts <I>et al</I> accounted for duration of statin use by examining effects for those with 1&ndash;119&nbsp;days, 120&ndash;364&nbsp;days and 365&nbsp;days or greater of statin use at 50% or more of the recommended daily dosage. Our approach was to use the yearly follow-up...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riddle, D. L., Moxley, G., Dumenci, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203546</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2013-203546</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to comments in: Statin use is associated with reduced incidence and progression of knee osteoarthritis in the Rotterdam study by Clockaerts et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Electronic pages</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e12</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e13?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/e13?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We read with interest the paper regarding the efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> We note the exclusion criteria included secondary knee osteoarthritis. On review of the results section, it appears that many of the patients, the randomised and the intention-to-treat groups, for example, the strontium 1&nbsp;g/day group, strontium 2&nbsp;g/day group and placebo group, were either overweight or obese having a raised body mass index (BMI) between 29&nbsp;kg/m<sup>2</sup> and 30&nbsp;kg/m<sup>2</sup>. It is well documented in the literature that patients who are obese are more likely to have knee osteoarthritis.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> It is also included in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria as one of the most common causes of secondary osteoarthritis. Our question is whether those with a raised BMI should have been excluded from the study. Also, we do not know...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murphy, C.-L., Murphy, E., Duffy, T., O'Sullivan, M., Barry, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203637</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2013-203637</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of strontium ranelate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: results of a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Electronic pages</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>e13</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>e13</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/789?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: it is only the beginning]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/789?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The new nomenclature used in spondyloarthritis (SpA), axial versus peripheral, as proposed by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) and accepted in 2009, has changed the perspective of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and other types of spondylarthropathies.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> The axial type of SpA is subdivided in the (early) non-radiographic type (nr-axial SpA) and the radiographic type, which is equivalent to the diagnosis of AS (according to the modified New York criteria<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref>). Instead of debating whether patients with AS do fulfil the grade of radiographic signs of sacroiliitis necessary for the diagnosis AS, the focus of interest has shifted towards the spectre of early detection of inflammation at the MRI of the pelvis and spine. The great advantage of the new nomenclature with an earlier phase of the disease is that the delay in diagnosis of SpA is shortened by years. Now the current...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van der Horst-Bruinsma, I. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202908</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202908</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Ankylosing spondylitis, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: it is only the beginning]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>789</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>790</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/791?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing gout needs more than drugs: 'Il faut le savoir-faire, l'Art et la maniere']]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/791?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Gout management has recently been a topic of active discussion, prompted by several European and international recommendations.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1&ndash;3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref> Nevertheless, a number of studies have reported a suboptimal level of current gout care, including even poorer adherence to prescribed drugs,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> than in patients with diabetes or hypertension.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> Quality indicators for the treatment of gout developed to date have focused primarily on the use of allopurinol as the most frequently prescribed urate lowering therapy (ULT), adjustment of the maximal dose according to renal function and serum uric acid (SUA) level measurement.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="R7">7</cross-ref></p> <p>In their provocative, proof-of-concept study, Rees <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R8">8</cross-ref> provide important preliminary evidence that treating gout effectively is not just a matter of initiating ULT, but rather of implementing a proper approach that combines patient education, individualised lifestyle advice, and appropriate use of ULTs to...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liote, F., Choi, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203226</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2013-203226</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Genetics, Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Radiology, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing gout needs more than drugs: 'Il faut le savoir-faire, l'Art et la maniere']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>791</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>793</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/794?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MRI comes of age in RA clinical trials]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/794?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The success of modern rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapies and treatment strategies has led to extended placebo phases being unethical in RA randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Modern trials therefore increasingly involve active comparator designs, and this together with some technical issues has meant difficulties in differentiating structural progression using traditional radiographic outcome measures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated to assess damage more sensitively than radiographs, but importantly it can measure the upstream drivers of erosions and cartilage loss, synovitis and osteitis. An increasing number of recent RCTs using the RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS) have demonstrated the ability of MRI to discriminate progression and treatment effect. Consistency of erosion progression determination was seen across the majority of these studies. In most studies, MRI demonstrated reduction in synovitis and osteitis at early (12 week) timepoints, and MRI predicted subsequent radiographic findings. Often small numbers of patients were required to demonstrate such changes. The time is right for regulatory authorities to include MRI as an alternative to radiographic data in support of claims of inhibition of progression of structural damage in RA trials.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peterfy, C., Ostergaard, M., Conaghan, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202696</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202696</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MRI comes of age in RA clinical trials]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Viewpoint</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>794</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>796</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/797?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Whipple's disease]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/797?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Whipple's disease is a chronic, systemic infection caused by <I>Tropheryma whipplei</I>. Gene amplification, isolation and DNA sequencing of <I>T whipplei</I> have extended our knowledge of this pathogen, which is now recognised as a ubiquitous commensal bacterium. The spectrum of signs associated with <I>T whipplei</I> has now been extended beyond the classic form, which affects middle-aged men, and begins with recurrent arthritis followed several years later by digestive problems associated with other diverse clinical signs. Children may present an acute primary infection, but only a small number of people with a genetic predisposition subsequently develop authentic Whipple's disease. This bacterium may also cause localised chronic infections with no intestinal symptoms: endocarditis, central nervous system involvement, arthritis, uveitis and spondylodiscitis. An impaired T<SUB>H</SUB>1 immune response is seen. <I>T whipplei</I> replication in vitro is dependent on interleukin 16 and is accompanied by the apoptosis of host cells, facilitating dissemination of the bacterium. In patients with arthritis, PCR with samples of joint fluid, saliva and stools has become the preferred examination for diagnosis. Immunohistochemical staining is also widely used for diagnosis. Treatment is based on recent microbiological data, but an immune reconstitution syndrome and recurrence remain possible. The future development of serological tests for diagnosis and the generalisation of antigen detection by immunohistochemistry should make it possible to obtain a diagnosis earlier and thus to decrease the morbidity, and perhaps also the mortality, associated with this curable disease which may, nonetheless, be fatal if diagnosed late or in an extensive systemic form.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Puechal, X.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:05-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202684</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202684</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Whipple's disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>797</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>803</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/804?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/804?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop evidence-based recommendations on the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The task force comprised an expert group of rheumatologists, radiologists, methodologists and experienced rheumatology practitioners from 13 countries. Thirteen key questions on the role of imaging in RA were generated using a process of discussion and consensus. Imaging modalities included were conventional radiography, ultrasound, MRI, CT, dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry, digital x-ray radiogrammetry, scintigraphy and positron emission tomography. Research evidence was searched systematically for each question using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL. The experts used the evidence obtained from the relevant studies to develop a set of 10 recommendations. The strength of recommendation was assessed using a visual analogue scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 6888 references was identified from the search process, from which 199 studies were included in the systematic review. Ten recommendations were produced encompassing the role of imaging in making a diagnosis of RA, detecting inflammation and damage, predicting outcome and response to treatment, monitoring disease activity, progression and remission. The strength of recommendation for each proposition varied according to both the research evidence and expert opinion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Ten key recommendations for the role of imaging in the management of RA were developed using research-based evidence and expert opinion.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colebatch, A. N., Edwards, C. J., Ostergaard, M., van der Heijde, D., Balint, P. V., D'Agostino, M.-A., Forslind, K., Grassi, W., Haavardsholm, E. A., Haugeberg, G., Jurik, A.-G., Landewe, R. B., Naredo, E., O'Connor, P. J., Ostendorf, B., Potocki, K., Schmidt, W. A., Smolen, J. S., Sokolovic, S., Watt, I., Conaghan, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-203158</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Radiology, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Recommendation</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>804</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>814</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/815?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial (ABILITY-1)]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/815?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients fulfilled Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria for axial spondyloarthritis, had a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score of &ge; 4, total back pain score of &ge; 4 (10&nbsp;cm visual analogue scale) and inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); patients fulfilling modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis were excluded. Patients were randomised to adalimumab (N=91) or placebo (N=94). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving ASAS40 at week 12. Efficacy assessments included BASDAI and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). MRI was performed at baseline and week 12 and scored using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Significantly more patients in the adalimumab group achieved ASAS40 at week 12 compared with patients in the placebo group (36% vs 15%, p&lt;0.001). Significant clinical improvements based on other ASAS responses, ASDAS and BASDAI were also detected at week 12 with adalimumab treatment, as were improvements in quality of life measures. Inflammation in the spine and sacroiliac joints on MRI significantly decreased after 12&nbsp;weeks of adalimumab treatment. Shorter disease duration, younger age, elevated baseline C-reactive protein or higher SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint scores were associated with better week 12 responses to adalimumab. The safety profile was consistent with what is known for adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis and other diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In patients with nr-axSpA, adalimumab treatment resulted in effective control of disease activity, decreased inflammation and improved quality of life compared with placebo. Results from ABILITY-1 suggest that adalimumab has a positive benefit&ndash;risk profile in active nr-axSpA patients with inadequate response to NSAIDs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sieper, J., van der Heijde, D., Dougados, M., Mease, P. J., Maksymowych, W. P., Brown, M. A., Arora, V., Pangan, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201766</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201766</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Editor's choice, Immunology (including allergy), Pain (neurology), Inflammation, Ankylosing spondylitis, Biological agents, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial (ABILITY-1)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>815</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>822</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/823?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Similar response rates in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis after 1 year of treatment with etanercept: results from the ESTHER trial]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/823?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We assessed whether there is a difference to etanercept (ETA) treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared with non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA) patients with a disease duration &lt;5&nbsp;years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>AS (n=20) and nr-axSpA (n=20) patients who were treated with ETA for 1&nbsp;year were compared for differences in baseline data and treatment effect. Clinical, laboratory and MRI of sacroiliac joints (SI-joints) and spine were analysed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At baseline, there were no significant differences between the 20 AS and the 20 nr-axSpA patients regarding age, disease duration, gender, HLA-B27 and clinical disease activity in terms of Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), C-reactive protein and MRI SI-joint and spine scores in the AS compared with the nr-axSpA group. After 1&nbsp;year of treatment with ETA the treatment effect was similarly good in AS and nr-axSpA (reduction of BASDAI by 3.3 (95% CI 2.2 to 3.8) vs 3.6 (95% CI 2.8 to 4.4) and reduction of AS Disease Activity Score by 1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.2) vs 1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.1), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The response rate to TNF-blockers does not differ between AS and nr-axSpA if the baseline data regarding symptom duration and disease activity are similar for the two groups.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Song, I.-H., Weiss, A., Hermann, K.-G. A., Haibel, H., Althoff, C. E., Poddubnyy, D., Listing, J., Lange, E., Freundlich, B., Rudwaleit, M., Sieper, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202389</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202389</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Editor's choice, Immunology (including allergy), Ankylosing spondylitis, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Similar response rates in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis after 1 year of treatment with etanercept: results from the ESTHER trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>823</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>825</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/826?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients with gout adhere to curative treatment if informed appropriately: proof-of-concept observational study]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/826?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Introduction</st>
<p>Many doctors believe that patients with gout are unwilling to receive urate-lowering therapy (ULT) and blame them for poor adherence to management.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To test the effectiveness of a complex intervention for gout that incorporates key elements of current guidelines, including full patient information, delivered in an optimal setting (specialist hospital clinic).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>Observational study of patients reporting ongoing attacks of gout recruited from primary care lists. 106 participants (94 men, 12 women; mean age 61 years) were enrolled in the study. Patients received a predominantly nurse-delivered intervention that included education, individualised lifestyle advice and appropriate ULT. The predefined goal was to achieve serum uric acid (SUA) levels &le;360 &mu;mol/l after 1 year in at least 70% of participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 106 participants at baseline, 16% had tophi; mean (SD) baseline SUA was 456 (98) &micro;mol/l. All participants agreed to joint aspiration to confirm gout and all wished to receive ULT. At 12 months, 92% of the 106 participants had achieved the therapeutic target (SUA&le;360 &micro;mol); 85% had SUA &lt;300 &micro;mol/l. Allopurinol was the most commonly used ULT, requiring a median dose of 400 mg daily to achieve the target. Improvements in Short Form-36 were observed (significant for pain) after 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>A predominantly nurse-led intervention including education, lifestyle advice and ULT can successfully achieve the recommended treatment target in more than 9 out of 10 patients. Full explanation and discussion about the nature of gout and its treatment options and individualisation of management probably account for this success.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rees, F., Jenkins, W., Doherty, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201676</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201676</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Genetics, Pain (neurology), Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients with gout adhere to curative treatment if informed appropriately: proof-of-concept observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>826</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>830</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/831?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients' needs and expectations with regard to rheumatology nursing care: results of multicentre focus group interviews]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/831?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The contribution of rheumatology nurses to improved patient outcomes is increasingly recognised but more research is needed about the effects of interventions. The patient's role in deciding about healthcare quality is considered pivotal and therefore patients&rsquo; opinions and expectations should be directional in defining priorities for a research agenda. The objective of this study was to explore needs and expectations with regard to rheumatology nursing care in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis (CIA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients aged 18&ndash;90&nbsp;years from three medical clinics in different regions in The Netherlands were invited to participate in focus group interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and independently analysed by the authors. In a consensus meeting the emerging subjects were categorised into themes which were verified in a fourth interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In total, 20 patients, mean age 57&nbsp;years old, participated in the focus group interviews. The majority had rheumatoid arthritis and mean disease duration was 15&nbsp;years. The focus group interviews revealed 12 subthemes that were organised into four main themes: education, self-management support, emotional support and well organised care. Additionally, patients considered opinions about &lsquo;the personality of the nurse&rsquo; (eg, easy to talk to) to be important.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients with CIA mentioned that many problems have to be addressed when one is faced with having a rheumatic disease. The focus group interviews yielded valuable information about the care these patients need and expect. This information will direct future research with regard to rheumatology nursing care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Eijk-Hustings, Y., Ammerlaan, J., Voorneveld-Nieuwenhuis, H., Maat, B., Veldhuizen, C., Repping-Wuts, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202810</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202810</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients' needs and expectations with regard to rheumatology nursing care: results of multicentre focus group interviews]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>831</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>835</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/836?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient satisfaction with nursing consultations in a rheumatology outpatient clinic: a 21-month randomised controlled trial in patients with inflammatory arthritides]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/836?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To study the effect of individual nursing consultations in patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in a rheumatology outpatient setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients with inflammatory arthritides (IA) who had started with a DMARD regimen 3&nbsp;months before were randomised to two different follow-up consultation systems: either follow-up by a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) or by a medical doctor (MD) in rheumatology 3, 9 and 21&nbsp;months after randomisation. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction measured by Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ). Secondary outcomes included coping, disease activity, pain, fatigue, patient's global assessment of disease activity and health related quality of life. Effects at 9 and 21&nbsp;months were estimated by Least Square means calculated from the final mixed model.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 68 patients randomised, 65 patients completed assessments at 21&nbsp;months. Statistically significant improvements in favour of the CNS group were found in all LSQ subscales (all p values &lt;0.001) and in overall satisfaction at 9&nbsp;months (adjusted mean between-group difference 0.74, 95% CI &ndash;0.96 to &ndash;0.52) and at 21&nbsp;months (&ndash;0.69, 96% CI &ndash;0.87 to &ndash;0.50). Disease activity Score 28 joint count (DAS-28) was improved from baseline to 9&nbsp;months in both groups and improvement was maintained at 21&nbsp;months, but without any group difference. No statistically significant between-group differences were found in any of the other secondary outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Patients with IA are likely to benefit from nurse consultations in terms of increased satisfaction with care compared with MD consultations and without loss of efficacy in terms of clinical outcomes.</p>
<p>The study is registered as a clinical trial at the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00403676).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koksvik, H. S., Hagen, K. B., Rodevand, E., Mowinckel, P., Kvien, T. K., Zangi, H. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202296</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202296</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Pain (neurology), Biological agents, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient satisfaction with nursing consultations in a rheumatology outpatient clinic: a 21-month randomised controlled trial in patients with inflammatory arthritides]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>836</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>843</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/844?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Induction therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate for 24 weeks followed by methotrexate monotherapy up to week 48 versus methotrexate therapy alone for DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: HIT HARD, an investigator-initiated study]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/844?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate the long-term effects of induction therapy with adalimumab (ADA) plus methotrexate (MTX) in comparison with placebo (PBO) plus MTX in DMARD-na&iuml;ve patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients with active early RA (disease duration of &le;12&nbsp;months) were randomly assigned to receive 40&nbsp;mg ADA subcutaneously every other week (eow) plus MTX 15&nbsp;mg/week subcutaneously or PBO plus MTX subcutaneously at 15&nbsp;mg/week over 24&nbsp;weeks. Thereafter, all patients received MTX monotherapy up to week 48. The primary outcome was the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at week 48. Secondary outcomes included proportions of patients in remission (DAS28&lt;2.6), ACR responses, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score and radiographic progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>87 patients were assigned to ADA/MTX and 85 patients to PBO/MTX. At baseline, DAS28 was 6.2&plusmn;0.8 in the ADA/MTX and 6.3&plusmn;0.9 in the PBO/MTX groups. At week 24, treatment with ADA/MTX compared with PBO/MTX resulted in a greater reduction in DAS28 (3.0&plusmn;1.2 vs 3.6&plusmn;1.4; p=0.009) and other secondary outcomes such as DAS28 remission rate (47.9% vs 29.5%; p=0.021) and HAQ (0.49&plusmn;0.6 vs 0.72&plusmn;0.6; p=0.0014). At week 48, the difference in clinical outcomes between groups was not statistically significant (DAS28: 3.2&plusmn;1.4 vs 3.4&plusmn;1.6; p=0.41). Radiographic progression at week 48 was significantly greater in patients administered PBO/MTX (Sharp/van der Heijde score: ADA/MTX 2.6 vs PBO/MTX 6.4; p=0.03, Ratingen score: 1.7 vs 4.2; p=0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>A greater reduction in radiographic progression after initial combination therapy with ADA and MTX was seen at week 48, even after discontinuation of ADA treatment at week 24. This sustained effect was not found at the primary endpoint (DAS28 reduction).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Detert, J., Bastian, H., Listing, J., Weiss, A., Wassenberg, S., Liebhaber, A., Rockwitz, K., Alten, R., Kruger, K., Rau, R., Simon, C., Gremmelsbacher, E., Braun, T., Marsmann, B., Hohne-Zimmer, V., Egerer, K., Buttgereit, F., Burmester, G.-R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201612</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201612</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Induction therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate for 24 weeks followed by methotrexate monotherapy up to week 48 versus methotrexate therapy alone for DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: HIT HARD, an investigator-initiated study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>844</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>850</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Infliximab for 6 months added on combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (the NEO-RACo Study)]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Early treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with combination treatment starting with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and prednisolone (FIN-RACo strategy) is superior to monotherapy. A study was undertaken to determine whether infliximab (INFL) added to intensified FIN-RACo treatment for the initial 6&nbsp;months improves the 2-year outcome.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>99 patients with early untreated active RA were enrolled in an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group trial. Primary outcomes were remission and radiological changes at 2&nbsp;years. All patients started with FIN-RACo. In addition, they were randomised to receive INFL or placebo (Pla) from weeks 4 to 26.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At 24&nbsp;months, 66% and 53%, respectively, of the patients in the FIN-RACo+INFL and FIN-RACo+Pla groups were in remission according to the modified American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (p=0.19), 26% and 10% were in sustained modified ACR remission (p=0.042) and 82% in both groups were in remission by 28-joint disease activity score (not significant). Mean changes in the total Sharp-van der Heijde score were 0.2 and 1.4, respectively (p=0.0058).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Most patients with early active RA achieve clinical remission and develop negligible joint damage with the intensified FIN-RACo regimen. Adding INFL for the first 6&nbsp;months delays radiological progression.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leirisalo-Repo, M., Kautiainen, H., Laasonen, L., Korpela, M., Kauppi, M. J., Kaipiainen-Seppanen, O., Luosujarvi, R., Luukkainen, R., Karjalainen, A., Blafield, H., Uutela, T., Ilva, K., Julkunen, H. A., Paimela, L., Puolakka, K., Moilanen, E., Hannonen, P. J., Mottonen, T., for the NEO-RACo Study Group, Alasaarela, Eklund, Hakola, Kononoff, Krogerus, Laiho, Malmi, Niinisalo, Peltomaa, Pollanen, Uusitalo, Valleala, Vuori, Nieminen, Vuolteenaho]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201365</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201365</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Infliximab for 6 months added on combination therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year results from an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (the NEO-RACo Study)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>857</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/858?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Very early rheumatoid arthritis as a predictor of remission: a multicentre real life prospective study]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/858?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>To assess whether, in the real world of three early arthritis clinics, early referral could allow the best outcome, ie, remission, to be reached, and whether reaching the outcome was more dependent on therapy than on disease duration or vice versa.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>1795 patients with early arthritis (symptom duration &le;12&nbsp;months) were entered into a prospective follow-up study. 711 patients (39.6%) were diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Each RA patient was treated according to the local algorithm, in three tertiary referral centres (representing a small province, a medium sized province and a metropolitan area, respectively). Remission, defined using the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28 &lt;2.6) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, was the major outcome evaluated at the 12-month follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>DAS28 remission was achieved in 34.3% (range 19.5&ndash;49%) of RA patients and ACR remission in 15.2% (range 8.5&ndash;20.6%). At the multivariate logistic regression analysis only two variables emerged as predictors of the major outcome: being in very early rheumatoid arthritis (VERA; less than 12&nbsp;weeks symptom duration at the time of first treatment) and being on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) within 3&nbsp;months from disease onset. Among RA patients in remission, only 10% of VERA subjects received an anti-TNF blocker compared with 32.2% of non-VERA patients (p=0.002, OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.64).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In a real-world setting, the 12&nbsp;weeks disease duration and an early intervention with DMARD represent the most significant opportunities to reach the major outcome, ie, remission of RA. Moreover, VERA represents a window of opportunity in terms of cost saving.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gremese, E., Salaffi, F., Bosello, S. L., Ciapetti, A., Bobbio-Pallavicini, F., Caporali, R., Ferraccioli, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy), Biological agents, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Very early rheumatoid arthritis as a predictor of remission: a multicentre real life prospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>858</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>862</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/863?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II, dose-finding, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled study]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/863?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To assess the safety and efficacy of secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-interleukin-17A antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients (n=237) with inadequate response to methotrexate were randomly assigned to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of secukinumab 25&nbsp;mg, 75&nbsp;mg, 150&nbsp;mg, 300&nbsp;mg or placebo. The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) at week 16.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Demographics and baseline characteristics were comparable across all treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved: the proportion of ACR20 responders at week 16 with secukinumab 25&ndash;300&nbsp;mg was 36.0&ndash;53.7% versus placebo (34%). Disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)&ndash;C-reactive protein (CRP) was a secondary endpoint and clinically relevant decreases with secukinumab 75&ndash;300&nbsp;mg were reported versus placebo. Serum high sensitivity CRP levels at week 16 were significantly reduced with secukinumab 75&nbsp;mg, 150&nbsp;mg and 300&nbsp;mg doses versus placebo. The safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with that seen with other biological agents. Most adverse events (AE) were mild to moderate in severity. Infections were slightly more frequent with secukinumab than placebo. Six serious AE were reported: secukinumab 75&nbsp;mg (one), secukinumab 300&nbsp;mg (four) and placebo (one).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ACR20 response rates differed between secukinumab 75&nbsp;mg, 150&nbsp;mg and 300&nbsp;mg doses and placebo; however, the primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved. Greater decreases in DAS28 were observed with secukinumab 75&nbsp;mg, 150&nbsp;mg and 300&nbsp;mg than placebo. There were no unexpected safety signals and no specific organ-related toxicities. Further trials with secukinumab in the treatment of RA are warranted.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Genovese, M. C., Durez, P., Richards, H. B., Supronik, J., Dokoupilova, E., Mazurov, V., Aelion, J. A., Lee, S.-H., Codding, C. E., Kellner, H., Ikawa, T., Hugot, S., Mpofu, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201601</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201601</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase II, dose-finding, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>863</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>869</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/870?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Insights in the relationship of joint space narrowing versus erosive joint damage and physical functioning of patients with RA']]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/870?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate the contribution of joint space narrowing (JSN) and erosions in general and in four different joint groups in relation to physical disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>5-year follow-up data from the Behandel Strategie&euml;n (BeSt) trial were used, where 508 patients with recent onset RA were treated aiming at a disease activity score &le;2.4. Joint damage was assessed annually and scored according to the Sharp-van der Heijde method. Physical disability was measured 3-monthly with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Generalised Estimating Equations analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the HAQ and JSN scores and erosions scores, separately and in joint groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overall, damage scores were low, and neither total JSN nor erosions showed a significant effect on HAQ (&beta;=0.001 95% CI &ndash;0.003 to 0.004 and &beta;=0.002 95% CI &ndash;0.001 to 0.006, respectively). Of the total damage scores per joint group, damage in the wrist shows a trend for association with physical disability displaying the largest effect size (&beta;=0.005 95% CI 0.000 to 0.011). Also in the analysis with erosions per joint group, the wrist was most strongly related with physical functioning (&beta;=0.016 95% CI 0.003 to 0.029); in the analysis with JSN per joint group no joint group was significantly related to the HAQ. Analysis of all erosion and narrowing scores per joint group in one model reveals only erosions in the wrist to be independently associated with impaired physical functioning (&beta;=0.017 95% CI 0.003 to 0.030).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Joint damage in the wrist, erosions more than JSN, is associated with impaired physical functioning even in patients with early RA with limited overall damage after 5 years tightly controlled treatment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koevoets, R., Dirven, L., Klarenbeek, N. B., van Krugten, M. V., Ronday, H. K., van der Heijde, D. M. F. M., Huizinga, T. W. J., Kerstens, P. S. J. M., Lems, W. F., Allaart, C. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201191</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2011-201191</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Disability, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Insights in the relationship of joint space narrowing versus erosive joint damage and physical functioning of patients with RA']]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>870</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>874</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/875?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rheumatoid factor determines structural progression of rheumatoid arthritis dependent and independent of disease activity]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/875?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Rheumatoid factor (RF) is prototypic for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and serves diagnostic and prognostic purposes. RF is associated with joint destruction, but the role of disease activity as a potential mediator of these effects has not been clearly elucidated yet.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate if higher radiographic progression (Sharp score, TSS) in RF+ patients is dependent or independent of disease activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The authors performed a cross-sectional multivariate analysis at baseline and a matched cohort study in patients from five RA clinical trials. The authors pooled methotrexate treatment arms and compared TSS in RF+ and RF&ndash; patients before and after matching for other associated variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Among 686 patients, 124 were RF&ndash; and 562 RF+, 343 having high (&gt;160&nbsp;U/ml) RF. TSS was 1.03&plusmn;5.83, 3.23&plusmn;8.10 and 3.58&plusmn;8.18 (p&lt;0.0001), respectively, and similarly for erosions and joint space narrowing (JSN). After matching for other prognostically important variables, TSS still was lower among 61 RF&ndash; versus 61 RF high+ patients (0.52&plusmn;2.47 vs 3.09&plusmn;8.28; p=0.028), mainly related to differences in erosion score (0.31&plusmn;1.88 vs 2.07&plusmn;5.62; p=0.035), but not JSN (0.21&plusmn;1.26 vs 1.02&plusmn;3.31; p=0.162).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The data reveal that damage progression in seropositive RA patients is related to higher levels of disease activity and to independent effects of RF, particularly on bone damage. This calls for consideration of RF status irrespective of disease activity.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aletaha, D., Alasti, F., Smolen, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201517</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201517</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rheumatoid factor determines structural progression of rheumatoid arthritis dependent and independent of disease activity]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>875</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>880</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/881?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Etanercept normalises left ventricular mass in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/881?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Cardiovascular mortality is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA is associated with an increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI), a strong marker of cardiovascular mortality, and vessel abnormalities. Experimental studies have suggested that tumour necrosis factor &alpha; (TNF&alpha;) may induce LV hypertrophy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To study the effect of medium-term (3- and 6-months) treatment with the TNF&alpha; inhibitor etanercept (ETN) and synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) on LV morphological features and arterial stiffness in patients with RA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Consecutive female patients with active RA requiring treatment with ETN (n=28) or sDMARDs (n=20) were included. Clinical and biological monitoring, echocardiography and pulse wave velocity (PWV) assessment were performed at inclusion and at 3 and 6&nbsp;months after the start of treatment. Paired t tests and multivariate linear regression analysis were used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Mean LVMI tended to be higher at baseline in the ETN group than in the sDMARD group (96.5&plusmn;19.8 vs 84.3&plusmn;26.8&nbsp;g/m<sup>2</sup>; p=0.11 for the ETN and sDMARD groups, respectively). In patients with ETN treatment, mean LVMI was significantly decreased at 3 and 6&nbsp;months (&ndash;6.3&plusmn;7.6 and &ndash;14.2&plusmn;9.3&nbsp;g/m<sup>2</sup>; p&lt;0.001), with no change from baseline for patients with sDMARD treatment (&ndash;2.2&plusmn;10.9 and &ndash;2.7&plusmn;10.2&nbsp;g/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively). Blood pressure (BP) and aortic PWV were not changed by either treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ETN induced a significant decrease in LVMI with medium-term treatment with no change in BP or PWV. TNF&alpha; may be an important factor of LV hypertrophy, which may explain the benefit of TNF inhibitors on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in RA. These results need to be confirmed by larger studies and with other TNF inhibitors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daien, C. I., Fesler, P., du Cailar, G., Daien, V., Mura, T., Dupuy, A.-M., Cristol, J.-P., Ribstein, J., Combe, B., Morel, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201489</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201489</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Radiology, Biological agents, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Etanercept normalises left ventricular mass in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>881</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>887</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ambient air pollution exposures and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Swedish EIRA case-control study]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Environmental factors may play a role in the development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined whether long-term exposures to air pollution were associated with the risk of RA in the Swedish Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Study.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We studied 1497 incident RA cases and 2536 controls. Local levels of particulate matter (PM<SUB>10</SUB>) and gaseous pollutants (sulphur dioxide (SO<SUB>2</SUB>) and nitrogen dioxide (NO<SUB>2</SUB>)) from traffic and home heating were predicted for all residential addresses. We examined the association of an IQR increase (2&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup> for PM<SUB>10</SUB>, 8&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup> for SO<SUB>2</SUB> and 9&nbsp;&micro;g/m<sup>3</sup> for NO<SUB>2</SUB>) in each pollutant at different time points before symptom onset and average exposure with the risk of all RA and the risk of the rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) RA phenotypes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>There was no evidence of an increased risk of RA with PM<SUB>10</SUB>. Total RA risks were modestly elevated for the gaseous pollutants, but were not statistically significant after adjustment for smoking and education (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.43 and OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.19 for SO<SUB>2</SUB> and NO<SUB>2</SUB> in the 10th year before onset). Stronger elevated risks were observed for individuals with less than a university education and with the ACPA-negative RA phenotype.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>No consistent overall associations between air pollution in the Stockholm area and the risk of RA were observed. However, there was a suggestion of increased risks of RA incidence with increases in NO<SUB>2</SUB> from local traffic and SO<SUB>2</SUB> from home heating sources with stronger associations for the ACPA-negative phenotype.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hart, J. E., Kallberg, H., Laden, F., Bellander, T., Costenbader, K. H., Holmqvist, M., Klareskog, L., Alfredsson, L., Karlson, E. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201587</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201587</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ambient air pollution exposures and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the Swedish EIRA case-control study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>894</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/895?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Difference in the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept: results from the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) registry]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/895?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibiting therapy increases the risk of serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is not clear whether this risk differs between TNF inhibitors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To analyse whether the risk of serious infections in patients with RA treated with an anti-TNF inhibitor is different for adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data from the Dutch RA monitoring registry were used. Incidence rates were calculated from the observed number of first serious infections and follow-up time up to 5&nbsp;years. A Cox proportional hazards model with time-to-first-serious infection was used to estimate risk differences among the anti-TNF treatment groups, with correction for confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The unadjusted incidence rate of a first serious infection in patients with RA per 100 patient-years was 2.61 (95% CI 2.21 to 3.00) for adalimumab, 3.86 (95% CI 3.33 to 4.40) for infliximab and 1.66 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.23) for etanercept. Age, year of starting anti-TNF therapy, comorbidities at baseline and disease activity score 28 over time were included as confounders. No difference in risk for serious infections was found between adalimumab and infliximab with an adjusted HR (adjHR) of 0.90 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.48). The risk of serious infections was significantly lower in etanercept than in both infliximab (adjHR=0.49 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.83)) and adalimumab (adjHR=0.55 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.67)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The risk of serious infections in patients with RA treated with adalimumab or infliximab was similar, while the risk of serious infections in patients with RA treated with etanercept was lower than with both adalimumab and infliximab.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Dartel, S. A. A., Fransen, J., Kievit, W., Flendrie, M., den Broeder, A. A., Visser, H., Hartkamp, A., van de Laar, M. A. F. J., van Riel, P. L. C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201338</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201338</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Difference in the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept: results from the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring (DREAM) registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>895</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>900</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multiple cytokines and chemokines are associated with rheumatoid arthritis-related autoimmunity in first-degree relatives without rheumatoid arthritis: Studies of the Aetiology of Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA)]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>We investigated whether rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related autoantibodies were associated with systemic inflammation in a prospective cohort of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of RA probands, a population without RA but at increased risk for its future development.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We studied 44 autoantibody positive FDRs, of whom 29 were rheumatoid factor (RF) positive, 25 were positive for the high risk autoantibody profile (HRP), that is, positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and/or for at least two RF IgM, IgG or IgA isotypes, and nine FDRs who were positive for both; and 62 FDRs who were never autoantibody positive. Twenty-five cytokines/chemokines were measured using a bead-based assay in serum. As a comprehensive measure of inflammation, we calculated a Cytokine Score by summing all cytokine/chemokine levels, weighted by their regression coefficients for RA-autoantibody association. We compared C-reactive protein, individual cytokines/chemokines and Cytokine Score to the outcomes: positivity for RF and for the HRP using logistic regression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity and ever smoking, the Cytokine Score and levels of IL-6 and IL-9 were associated with both RF and HRP. IL-2, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and interferon (IFN)- were associated with HRP only. Associations between the Cytokine Score and RF and HRP positivity were replicated in an independent military personnel cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In first-degree relatives of patients with RA, RA-related autoimmunity is associated with inflammation, as evidenced by associations with multiple cytokines and chemokines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hughes-Austin, J. M., Deane, K. D., Derber, L. A., Kolfenbach, J. R., Zerbe, G. O., Sokolove, J., Lahey, L. J., Weisman, M. H., Buckner, J. H., Mikuls, T. R., O'Dell, J. R., Keating, R. M., Gregersen, P. K., Robinson, W. H., Holers, V. M., Norris, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201505</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201505</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multiple cytokines and chemokines are associated with rheumatoid arthritis-related autoimmunity in first-degree relatives without rheumatoid arthritis: Studies of the Aetiology of Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>907</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/908?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Methotrexate polyglutamation in relation to infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/908?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>The combination of methotrexate (MTX) with infliximab can modify infliximab pharmacokinetics and lower the incidence of antibodies against infliximab (ATIs). We hypothesised that the pharmacokinetic interaction between MTX and infliximab is related to activation of MTX to immunosuppressive MTX polyglutamates (MTXPGs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving weekly MTX with infliximab for more than 3&nbsp;months were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Blood was collected at trough before the infusion of infliximab. Red blood cell (RBC) MTXPGs were measured using liquid chromatography, and circulating levels of infliximab were measured using a cell-based assay. ATIs were measured using enzyme immunoassays. Statistical analyses consisted of multiple regression and Wilcoxon tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the 61 patients enrolled in the study, ATIs were detected in 11 (18%). Regression analyses revealed that lower infliximab levels (median 3.3&nbsp;&micro;g/ml) were associated with the presence of ATIs and lower RBC MTXPG levels (median 28&nbsp;nmol/l) (p&lt;0.05). Logistic regression revealed that RBC MTXPG levels above 25&nbsp;nmol/l were associated with a 4.7-fold lower likelihood of having ATIs (OR=4.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 20.8; p=0.02). None of the 12 patients with RBC MTXPG levels above 50&nbsp;nmol/l tested positive for ATIs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These hypothesis-generating data indicate that MTXPGs are associated with infliximab pharmacokinetics and ATI formation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dervieux, T., Weinblatt, M. E., Kivitz, A., Kremer, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202591</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202591</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Methotrexate polyglutamation in relation to infliximab pharmacokinetics in rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>908</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>910</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/911?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An increased rate of falling leads to a rise in fracture risk in postmenopausal women with self-reported osteoarthritis: a prospective multinational cohort study (GLOW)]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/911?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Patients with osteoarthritis have increased bone mass but no decrease in fractures. The association between self-reported osteoarthritis and incident falls and fractures was studied in postmenopausal women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women is a prospective multinational cohort of 60&nbsp;393 non-institutionalised women aged &ge;55&nbsp;years who had visited primary care practices within the previous 2&nbsp;years. Questionnaires were mailed at yearly intervals. Patients were classified as having osteoarthritis if they answered yes to the question, &lsquo;Has a doctor or other health provider ever said that you had osteoarthritis or degenerative joint disease?&rsquo;, and this was validated against primary care records in a subsample. Information on incident falls, fractures and covariates was self-reported. Cox and Poisson models were used for incident fractures and number of falls, respectively, to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and rate ratios (RRs) for baseline osteoarthritis status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 51&nbsp;386 women followed for a median of 2.9&nbsp;years (interquartile range 2.1&ndash;3.0), 20&nbsp;409 (40%) reported osteoarthritis. The adjusted HR for osteoarthritis predicting fracture was 1.21 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.30; p&lt;0.0001) and the adjusted RR for falls was 1.24 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.26; p&lt;0.0001). However, the association between osteoarthritis and fracture was not significant after adjustment for incident falls (HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.15; p=0.13)).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Postmenopausal women with self-reported osteoarthritis have a 20% increased risk of fracture and experience 25% more falls than those without osteoarthritis. These data suggest that increased falls are the causal pathway of the association between osteoarthritis and fractures.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prieto-Alhambra, D., Nogues, X., Javaid, M. K., Wyman, A., Arden, N. K., Azagra, R., Cooper, C., Adachi, J. D., Boonen, S., Chapurlat, R. D., Compston, J. E., Gehlbach, S. H., Greenspan, S. L., Hooven, F. H., Netelenbos, J. C., Pfeilschifter, J., Rossini, M., Sambrook, P. N., Silverman, S., Siris, E. S., Watts, N. B., Diez-Perez, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201451</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201451</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Menopause (including HRT), Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, Epidemiology, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An increased rate of falling leads to a rise in fracture risk in postmenopausal women with self-reported osteoarthritis: a prospective multinational cohort study (GLOW)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>911</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>917</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/918?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK)]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/918?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To determine the association between cam impingement, which is hip incongruity by a non-spherical femoral head and development of osteoarthritis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A nationwide prospective cohort study of 1002 early symptomatic osteoarthritis patients (CHECK), of which standardised anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were obtained at baseline and at 2 and 5&nbsp;years follow-up. Asphericity of the femoral head was measured by the &alpha; angle. Clinically, decreased internal hip rotation (&le;20&deg;) is suggestive of cam impingement. The strength of association between those parameters at baseline and development of incident osteoarthritis (K&amp;L grade  2) or end-stage osteoarthritis (K&amp;L grades 3, 4, or total hip replacement) within 5&nbsp;years was expressed in OR using generalised estimating equations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>At baseline, 76% of the included hips had no radiographic signs of osteoarthritis and 24% doubtful osteoarthritis. Within 5&nbsp;years, 2.76% developed end-stage osteoarthritis. A moderate (&alpha; angle &gt;60&deg;) and severe (&alpha; angle &gt;83&deg;) cam-type deformity resulted in adjusted OR of 3.67 (95% CI 1.68 to 8.01) and 9.66 (95% CI 4.72 to 19.78), respectively, for end-stage osteoarthritis. The combination of severe cam-type deformity and decreased internal rotation at baseline resulted in an even more pronounced adjusted OR, and in a positive predictive value of 52.6% for end-stage osteoarthritis. For incident osteoarthritis, only a moderate cam-type deformity was predictive OR=2.42 (95% CI 1.15 to 5.06).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Individuals with both severe cam-type deformity and reduced internal rotation are strongly predisposed to fast progression to end-stage osteoarthritis. As cam impingement might be a modifiable risk factor, early recognition of this condition is important.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agricola, R., Heijboer, M. P., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A., Verhaar, J. A. N., Weinans, H., Waarsing, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201643</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201643</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiology, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoarthritis, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>918</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>923</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/924?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Progression of osteoarthritis as a state of inertia]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/924?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To test whether knees which recently developed disease were at higher risk for subsequent x-ray progression than knees which had been stable, suggesting that recent change produces further change and recent stability yields subsequent stability (a pattern of inertia).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used central readings of the annual posteroanterior x-rays obtained in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) focusing on change in Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade and change in semiquantitative joint space. We examined whether knees that had developed incident disease (KL grade 2) were at higher risk of subsequent progression than knees that were already grade 2 and had had stable disease. We combined data from multiple examinations. Using generalised estimating equations to adjust for the correlation between knees, we carried out logistic regression evaluating the risk for disease progression testing incident versus stable disease adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, physical activity, quadriceps strength and mechanical alignment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>1562 OAI subjects with grade 2 disease had a mean age of 61.8 years, mean BMI of 29.4, and 61.7% were women. Of knees with stable disease, 4.1% showed progression within the next 12 months in KL grade versus 13.7% in those with incident disease (adjusted OR 4.0; 95% CI 2.4 to 6.7). For progression of joint space loss, we found a similar relation with incident versus stable disease (adjusted OR 5.3; 95% CI 3.6 to 7.9).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Knee osteoarthritis radiographic progression follows a pattern of inertia. Factors that trigger the transition from stable disease to progression should be sought.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felson, D., Niu, J., Sack, B., Aliabadi, P., McCullough, C., Nevitt, M. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoarthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Progression of osteoarthritis as a state of inertia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>924</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>929</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/930?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In erosive hand osteoarthritis more inflammatory signs on ultrasound are found than in the rest of hand osteoarthritis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/930?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To compare inflammation as assessed by ultrasound between patients with the subset erosive hand osteoarthritis (EOA) versus non-EOA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Consecutive hand osteoarthritis (HOA) patients (fulfilling ACR criteria) were included. Eighteen interphalangeal joints were scored on radiographs using the Verbruggen&ndash;Veys anatomical phase score; E and R phases were defined as erosive. Patients were assigned to EOA when at least one joint was erosive. Effusion, synovial thickening and power Doppler signal (PDS) were scored with ultrasound on a 4-point scale. Generalised estimated equation analyses were used to compare ultrasound features between EOA and HOA, and to associate ultrasound features with.anatomical phases; OR with 95% CI were calculated with adjustments for patient effects and confounders.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 55 HOA patients (mean age 61&nbsp;years, 86% women) 51% had EOA. In 94 erosive joints, synovial thickening, effusion and PDS were found in 13%, 50% and 15%, respectively; in 896 non-erosive joints in 10%, 26% and 8%, respectively. In summated scores of PDS, effusion was higher in EOA than in non-EOA. Effusion and synovial thickening were more frequent in S, J, E and R phases compared to N phase. PDS was only associated with E phase (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.3 to 20.5) not with other phases. Non-erosive joints in EOA demonstrated more PDS (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6 to 6.4) and effusion (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.8) in comparison to joints in non-EOA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Inflammatory signs are more frequent in EOA than in non-EOA, not only in erosive joints but also in non-erosive joints, suggesting an underlying systemic cause for erosive evolution.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kortekaas, M. C., Kwok, W.-Y., Reijnierse, M., Huizinga, T. W. J., Kloppenburg, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201458</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201458</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Radiology, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoarthritis, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In erosive hand osteoarthritis more inflammatory signs on ultrasound are found than in the rest of hand osteoarthritis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>930</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>934</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/935?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the genetic overlap between osteoarthritis with body mass index and height using genome-wide association scan data]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/935?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Obesity as measured by body mass index (BMI) is one of the major risk factors for osteoarthritis. In addition, genetic overlap has been reported between osteoarthritis and normal adult height variation. We investigated whether this relationship is due to a shared genetic aetiology on a genome-wide scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We compared genetic association summary statistics (effect size, p value) for BMI and height from the GIANT consortium genome-wide association study (GWAS) with genetic association summary statistics from the arcOGEN consortium osteoarthritis GWAS. Significance was evaluated by permutation. Replication of osteoarthritis association of the highlighted signals was investigated in an independent dataset. Phenotypic information of height and BMI was accounted for in a separate analysis using osteoarthritis-free controls.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We found significant overlap between osteoarthritis and height (p=3.3<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;5</sup> for signals with p&le;0.05) when the GIANT and arcOGEN GWAS were compared. For signals with p&le;0.001 we found 17 shared signals between osteoarthritis and height and four between osteoarthritis and BMI. However, only one of the height or BMI signals that had shown evidence of association with osteoarthritis in the arcOGEN GWAS was also associated with osteoarthritis in the independent dataset: rs12149832, within the <I>FTO</I> gene (combined p=2.3<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10<sup>&ndash;5</sup>). As expected, this signal was attenuated when we adjusted for BMI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We found a significant excess of shared signals between both osteoarthritis and height and osteoarthritis and BMI, suggestive of a common genetic aetiology. However, only one signal showed association with osteoarthritis when followed up in a new dataset.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliott, K. S., Chapman, K., Day-Williams, A., Panoutsopoulou, K., Southam, L., Lindgren, C. M., the GIANT consortium, Arden, N., Aslam, N., Birrell, F., Carluke, I., Carr, A., Deloukas, P., Doherty, M., Loughlin, J., McCaskie, A., Ollier, W. E. R., Rai, A., Ralston, S., Reed, M. R., Spector, T. D., Valdes, A. M., Wallis, G. A., Wilkinson, M., the arcOGEN consortium, Zeggini, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202081</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202081</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Obesity (nutrition), Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoarthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of the genetic overlap between osteoarthritis with body mass index and height using genome-wide association scan data]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>935</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>941</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/942?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Co-localisation of non-cartilaginous articular pathology increases risk of cartilage loss in the tibiofemoral joint--the MOST study]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/942?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Purpose</st>
<p>To assess risk of cartilage loss in the tibiofemoral joint in relation to baseline damage severity, and to analyse the association of nearby pathologic findings on the risk of subsequent cartilage loss.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study is a longitudinal study of individuals with or at high risk for knee osteoarthritis. MRI examinations were assessed according to the Whole Organ MRI Score. Included were all knees with available baseline and 30&nbsp;months MRIs. Ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate risk of cartilage loss in each subregion in relation to the number of associated articular features including bone marrow lesions, meniscal damage and extrusion and also in regard to baseline damage severity, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>13&nbsp;524 subregions of 1365 knees were included. 3777 (27.9%) subregions exhibited prevalent cartilage damage at baseline and 1119 (8.3%) subregions showed cartilage loss at 30-month follow-up. Risk of cartilage loss was increased for subregions with associated features (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.03 to 3.15 for one, 4.32 95% CI 3.42 to 5.47 for two and 5.30 95% CI 3.95 to 7.12 for three associated features; p for trend &lt;0.0001). Subregions with prevalent cartilage damage showed increased risk for further cartilage loss compared to subregions with intact cartilage at baseline with small superficial defects exhibiting highest risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Risk of cartilage loss is increased for subregions with associated pathology and further increased when more than one type of associated feature is present. In addition, prevalent cartilage damage increases risk for subsequent cartilage loss.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roemer, F. W., Felson, D. T., Wang, K., Crema, M. D., Neogi, T., Zhang, Y., Nevitt, M. C., Marra, M. D., Lewis, C. E., Torner, J., Guermazi, A., for MOST study investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201810</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201810</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoarthritis, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Co-localisation of non-cartilaginous articular pathology increases risk of cartilage loss in the tibiofemoral joint--the MOST study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>942</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>948</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence and predictors of secondary fibromyalgia in an early arthritis cohort]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Secondary fibromyalgia (FM) is common among patients with inflammatory arthritis, but little is known about its incidence and the factors leading to its development. The authors examined the incidence of secondary FM in an early inflammatory arthritis cohort, and assessed the association between pain, inflammation, psychosocial variables and the clinical diagnosis of FM.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data from 1487 patients in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort, a prospective, observational Canadian cohort of early inflammatory arthritis patients were analysed. Diagnoses of FM were determined by rheumatologists. Incidence rates were calculated, and Cox regression models were used to determine HRs for FM risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The cumulative incidence rate was 6.77 (95% CI 5.19 to 8.64) per 100 person-years during the first 12&nbsp;months after inflammatory arthritis diagnosis, and decreased to 3.58 (95% CI 1.86 to 6.17) per 100 person-years 12&ndash;24&nbsp;months after arthritis diagnosis. Pain severity (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.46) and poor mental health (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.62) predicted FM risk. Citrullinated peptide positivity (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.88) was associated with decreased FM risk. Serum inflammatory markers and swollen joint count were not significantly associated with FM risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The incidence of FM was from 3.58 to 6.77 cases per 100 person-years, and was highest during the first 12&nbsp;months after diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. Although inflammation was not associated with the clinical diagnosis of FM, pain severity and poor mental health were associated with the clinical diagnosis of FM. Seropositivity was inversely associated with the clinical diagnosis of FM.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, Y. C., Lu, B., Boire, G., Haraoui, B., Hitchon, C. A., Pope, J. E., Thorne, J. C., Keystone, E. C., Solomon, D. H., Bykerk, V. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201506</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201506</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Muscle disease, Pain (neurology), Inflammation, Degenerative joint disease, Fibromyalgia, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Clinical diagnostic tests]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence and predictors of secondary fibromyalgia in an early arthritis cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>954</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/955?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in fibromyalgia syndrome: network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/955?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To synthesise the available evidence on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions recommended for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Electronic databases including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing any therapeutic approach as recommended in FMS guidelines (except complementary and alternative medicine) with control interventions in patients with FMS. Primary outcomes were pain and quality of life. Data extraction was done using standardised forms.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>102 trials in 14&nbsp;982 patients and eight active interventions (tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), the gamma-amino butyric acid analogue pregabalin, aerobic exercise, balneotherapy, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), multicomponent therapy) were included. Most of the trials were small and hampered by methodological quality, introducing heterogeneity and inconsistency in the network. When restricted to large trials with &ge;100 patients per group, heterogeneity was low and benefits for SNRIs and pregabalin compared with placebo were statistically significant, but small and not clinically relevant. For non-pharmacological interventions, only one large trial of CBT was available. In medium-sized trials with &ge;50 patients per group, multicomponent therapy showed small to moderate benefits over placebo, followed by aerobic exercise and CBT.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Benefits of pharmacological treatments in FMS are of questionable clinical relevance and evidence for benefits of non-pharmacological interventions is limited. A combination of pregabalin or SNRIs as pharmacological interventions and multicomponent therapy, aerobic exercise and CBT as non-pharmacological interventions seems most promising for the management of FMS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuesch, E., Hauser, W., Bernardy, K., Barth, J., Juni, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201249</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2011-201249</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Muscle disease, Pain (neurology), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Fibromyalgia, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in fibromyalgia syndrome: network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>955</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>962</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/963?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Muscle fatigue in fibromyalgia is in the brain, not in the muscles: a case-control study of perceived versus objective muscle fatigue]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/963?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate relationships between perceived and objectively measured muscle fatigue during exhausting muscle contractions in women with fibromyalgia (FM) compared with healthy controls (HC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Women with FM and HC completed an isometric muscle exhaustion task at 90&deg; shoulder abduction. Surface electromyographic (EMG) activity in the deltoid muscle was recorded together with self-reported level of muscle fatigue.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>25 participants with FM and 23 HC were included. Average time to exhaustion was 254&nbsp;s shorter in participants with FM than in HC. Participants with FM did not exhibit the same level of objective signs of muscle fatigue, seen as fewer changes in the EMG activity, as the HC during the exhaustion task. The task did not provoke pain in the HC, while participants with FM reported a doubling of pain.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Women with FM had shorter exhaustion times and showed fewer objective signs of muscle fatigue during an exhausting isometric shoulder abduction compared with younger HC. This indicates that perceived muscle fatigue may be of central origin and supports the notion of central nervous dysfunction as basic pathological changes in FM.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bandak, E., Amris, K., Bliddal, H., Danneskiold-Samsoe, B., Henriksen, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202340</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202340</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Muscle disease, Pain (neurology), Fibromyalgia, Musculoskeletal syndromes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Muscle fatigue in fibromyalgia is in the brain, not in the muscles: a case-control study of perceived versus objective muscle fatigue]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>963</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>966</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/967?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Active inflammation and structural change in early active axial spondyloarthritis as detected by whole-body MRI]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/967?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate active inflammatory lesions (AIL) and structural changes (SC) in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) compared with patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on whole-body MRI (wb-MRI).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Method</st>
<p>75 patients with active disease and a symptom duration of &lt;5&nbsp;years (39 with AS and 36 with nr-axSpA) were investigated with a comprehensive wb-MRI protocol and scored for AIL and SC in the spine, sacroiliac joints (SIJs) and non-axial manifestations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>92% of patients with AS showed active inflammation in the SIJ, 53% in the spine and 94% and 39%, respectively, in the nr-axSpA group. There was a non-significant trend towards more inflammation in patients with AS compared with patients with nr-axSpA in SIJs and spine. Peripheral enthesitis/osteitis was more common in patients with AS (n=22) than in those with nr-axSpA (n=12) (p=0.05). SC were more common in patients with AS than in those with nr-axSpA, with significantly higher scores for SIJ fatty bone marrow deposition (FMD) in patients with AS (4.8&plusmn;3.2) compared with those with nr-axSpA (2.4&plusmn;2.7; p=0.001) and more frequent bone proliferation in the spine and the SIJ (p=0.02 and p=0.005, respectively). SIJ erosions were more common in AS (score 4.2&plusmn;2.3) than in nr-axSpA (score 3.8&plusmn;1.8) patients (not significant).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Wb-MRI detects active inflammation and SC more frequently in the SIJs than in the spine. Half of the patients showed inflammation in non-axial sites. Active inflammatory and structural lesions were present both in patients with AS and those with nr-axSpA, being only slightly more common in patients with AS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Althoff, C. E., Sieper, J., Song, I.-H., Haibel, H., Weiss, A., Diekhoff, T., Rudwaleit, M., Freundlich, B., Hamm, B., Hermann, K.-G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201545</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201545</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Ankylosing spondylitis, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Active inflammation and structural change in early active axial spondyloarthritis as detected by whole-body MRI]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>967</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>973</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epistasis between two HLA antigens defines a subset of individuals at a very high risk for ankylosing spondylitis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Susceptibility to spondyloarthritis (SpA) is largely genetically determined. To understand increasingly complex genetic associations, one approach is to study epistasis or genetic interactions. Several associations between HLA antigens and SpA including HLA-B27 have been reported. In this study, we investigated epistasis between common HLA class I risk antigens in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the most typical form of SpA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In 154 patients with AS and 5584 controls, HLA class I antigens were analysed for association with AS. Biological interaction was analysed by investigating whether the effects of the risk factors combined departed from additivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Apart from the association with HLA-B27, we found an association between HLA-B60 and AS (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.8). This was confirmed in a meta-analysis (OR 2.2; CI 1.8 to 2.8). While 18.2% of AS patients had both HLA-B27 and HLA-B60, this combination was found in only 0.4% of controls. Using AS patients without HLA-B27 and HLA-B60 as a reference, the relative risk (RR) for disease in HLA-B27&ndash;/HLA-B60+ patients was 1.2 (95% CI 0.3 to 4.1). For HLA-B27+/HLA-B60&ndash; the RR was 69 (95% CI 40 to 111) but increased to 342 (95% CI 147 to 708) in HLA-B27+/HLA-B60+ patients. For the interaction, the relative excess risk due to interaction was 251, the attributable proportion was 0.8 and the synergy index was 4.7. The interaction was confirmed in an independent cohort.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>There is a strong epistatic interaction between HLA-B60 and HLA-B27 in AS susceptibility<I>.</I> As a result, individuals with the HLA-B27+/HLA-B60+ genotype are at a very high risk of developing AS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Gaalen, F. A., Verduijn, W., Roelen, D. L., Bohringer, S., Huizinga, T. W. J., van der Heijde, D. M., Toes, R. E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201774</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201774</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Genetics, Immunology (including allergy), Ankylosing spondylitis, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis, Calcium and bone]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epistasis between two HLA antigens defines a subset of individuals at a very high risk for ankylosing spondylitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>978</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/979?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does the site of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities match the site of recent-onset inflammatory back pain? The DESIR cohort]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/979?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To assess whether the site of axial pain (thoracic spine, lumbar spine or buttock(s)) was associated with the site of MRI lesions in patients with recent inflammatory back pain (IBP) suggesting spondyloarthritis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We conducted a cross-sectional study of baseline data in 708 patients with recent IBP from the DESIR cohort. Radiographs of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) and MRI scans of the SIJs and thoracic and lumbar spine were obtained routinely. Associations between pain sites and sites of inflammatory and structural MRI changes were evaluated using separate multivariate logistic regressions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 648 patients with complete data, 61% had thoracic pain, 91.6% lumbar pain and 79.2% buttock pain. MRI inflammation was seen in 19%, 21% and 46% of patients at the thoracic, lumbar and SIJ sites, respectively. By multivariate analysis, pain was significantly associated with MRI inflammation only at the same site (adjusted OR (aOR)<SUB>thoracic</SUB> <SUB>pain</SUB> 1.71; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.67; p=0.02; aOR<SUB>lumbar pain</SUB> 2.53; 95% CI 1.03 to 6.20; p=0.04; aOR<SUB>buttock pain</SUB> 2.86; 95% CI 1.84 to 4.46; p&lt;0.0001). Pain site was not significantly associated with the site of structural MRI changes, except for buttock pain and SIJ structural MRI changes (aOR<SUB>buttock pain</SUB> 1.89; 95% CI 1.22 to 2.90; p=0.004). The association between pain site and site of MRI inflammation persisted in the subgroups with normal or doubtful SIJ radiographs or with Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for axial spondyloarthritis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The site of pain (thoracic spine, lumbar spine or buttock(s)) is associated with MRI inflammation at the same site in patients with recent IBP.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blachier, M., Coutanceau, B., Dougados, M., Saraux, A., Bastuji-Garin, S., Ferkal, S., Le Corvoisier, P., Farrenq, V., Poulain, C., Ghaleh, B., Canoui-Poitrine, F., Claudepierre, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201427</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201427</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Pain (neurology), Inflammation, Radiology, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does the site of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities match the site of recent-onset inflammatory back pain? The DESIR cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>979</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>985</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/986?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The development of candidate composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis (GRACE project)]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/986?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To develop new composite disease activity indices for psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data from routine clinic visits at multiple centres were collected in a systematic manner. Data included all domains identified as important in randomised controlled trials in PsA. Decisions to change treatment were used as surrogates for high disease activity. New indices were developed by multiple linear regression (psoriatic arthritis disease activity score: PASDAS) and empirically, utilising physician-defined cut-offs for disease activity (arithmetic mean of desirability functions: AMDF). These were compared with existing composite measures: Composite Psoriatic arthritis Disease Activity Index (CPDAI), Disease Activity for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Disease Activity Score for rheumatoid arthritis (DAS28).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>161/503 (32%) subjects had treatment changes. Although all measures performed well, compared with existing indices, PASDAS was better able to discriminate between high and low disease activity (area under receiver operating curves (ROC)) curve with 95% CI: PASDAS 0.773 (0.723, 0.822); AMDF 0.730 (0.680, 0.780); CPDAI 0.719 (0.668, 0.770); DAPSA 0.710 (0.654, 0.766); DAS28 0.736 (0.680, 0.792). All measures were able to discriminate between disease activity states in patients with oligoarthritis, although area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) were generally smaller. In patients with severe skin disease (psoriasis area and severity index &gt;10) both nonparametric and AUC curve statistics were nonsignificant for all measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Two new composite measures to assess disease activity in PsA have been developed. Further testing in other datasets, including comparison with existing measures, is required to validate these instruments.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helliwell, P. S., FitzGerald, O., Fransen, J., Gladman, D. D., Kreuger, G. G., Callis-Duffin, K., McHugh, N., Mease, P. J., Strand, V., Waxman, R., Azevedo, V. F., Beltran Ostos, A., Carneiro, S., Cauli, A., Espinoza, L. R., Flynn, J. A., Hassan, N., Healy, P., Kerzberg, E. M., Lee, Y. J., Lubrano, E., Marchesoni, A., Marzo-Ortega, H., Porru, G., Moreta, E. G., Nash, P., Raffayova, H., Ranza, R., Raychaudhuri, S. P., Roussou, E., Scarpa, R., Song, Y. W., Soriano, E. R., Tak, P. P., Ujfalussy, I., de Vlam, K., Walsh, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201341</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201341</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The development of candidate composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis (GRACE project)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>986</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>991</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/992?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The link between enthesitis and arthritis in psoriatic arthritis: a switch to a vascular phenotype at insertions may play a role in arthritis development]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/992?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Subclinical enthesopathy is recognised in both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study used ultrasonography with power Doppler (PD) to test the hypothesis that subclinical enthesopathy in PsA was associated with an &lsquo;inflammatory&rsquo; or vascular phenotype compared to that seen in psoriasis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>100 patients with a mean age of 46.3&nbsp;years (SD 15) (42 with psoriasis and 58 with PsA) and 23 matched healthy controls (HC) from two centres were included. 1230 lower limb entheses were scanned by ultrasonographers blinded to clinical details. Both inflammatory and chronic features of enthesopathy were scored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Psoriasis patients (with or without arthritis) were more likely to express a vascular phenotype, with higher inflammation-related enthesopathy scores than HC (for inflammation p&lt;0.0001, for chronicity p=0.02, for total ultrasound scores p&lt;0.0001). The PsA patients had higher ultrasound enthesopathy scores than psoriasis patients (inflammation p=0.04, chronicity p=0.02) and HC (inflammation p&lt;0.0001, chronicity p=0.003). When symptomatic entheses were excluded, PsA patients still had higher PD scores than psoriasis patients (p=0.003). Doppler positivity in at least one entheseal site was observed more frequently in PsA (21/58, 36.2%) versus psoriasis (4/42, 9.5%; p=0.002).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This study shows that the ultrasound appearances of subclinical enthesitis in psoriasis differ from the subclinical enthesitis in PsA, with PsA patients having more PD. This is suggestive of a more inflammatory or vascular process in PsA, and offers potentially novel insights into the progression from skin to joint disease in psoriasis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aydin, S. Z., Ash, Z. R., Tinazzi, I., Castillo-Gallego, C., Kwok, C., Wilson, C., Goodfield, M., Gisondi, P., Tan, A. L., Marzo-Ortega, H., Emery, P., Wakefield, R. J., McGonagle, D. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201617</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201617</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Radiology, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The link between enthesitis and arthritis in psoriatic arthritis: a switch to a vascular phenotype at insertions may play a role in arthritis development]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>992</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>995</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Steroid injection for inferior heel pain: a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain. The aim of this study was twofold: to compare steroid injection with placebo injection and to compare ultrasound guided with unguided steroid injection in the management of this condition.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>65 patients with inferior heel pain were recruited between November 2008 and June 2011. Heel pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and follow-up 6 and 12&nbsp;weeks after injection.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>22 patients were randomised to ultrasound guided steroid injection, 21 patients to palpation guided steroid injection and 22 to ultrasound guided placebo injection. There was a significant difference in VAS scores between the groups at 6 and 12&nbsp;weeks (p=0.018 and p=0.004, respectively). There was a 19.7 (95% CI 2.5 to 37.0) difference in mean VAS scores at 6&nbsp;weeks between the ultrasound guided steroid group and the placebo group and a 24.0 (95% CI 6.6 to 41.3) difference between the unguided steroid group and the placebo group at 6&nbsp;weeks. At 12&nbsp;weeks, the mean difference was 25.1 (95% CI 6.5 to 43.6) and 28.4 (95% CI 11.1 to 45.7) respectively between both steroid injection groups and the placebo group. There was no difference in VAS scores following steroid injection between the ultrasound guided and the unguided groups at either time point. Plantar fascia thickness was significantly reduced after injection in both active treatment groups (p=0.00).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In this study, steroid injection showed a clear benefit over placebo at 6&nbsp;weeks and this difference was maintained at 12&nbsp;weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<p>Trial Registration No ISRCTN79628180 (<A HREF="www.controlled-trials.com).">www.controlled-trials.com).</A></p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ball, E. M. A., McKeeman, H. M. A., Patterson, C., Burns, J., Yau, W. H., Moore, O. A., Benson, C., Foo, J., Wright, G. D., Taggart, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201508</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201508</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain (neurology), Radiology, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Clinical diagnostic tests, Radiology (diagnostics), Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Steroid injection for inferior heel pain: a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1002</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1003?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Revisiting the classification of clinical phenotypes of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a cluster analysis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1003?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) are subgroups of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) defined historically by clinical and histological features. GPA and MPA are heterogeneous entities with overlapping phenotypes. To identify novel subgroupings, cluster analysis was used to explore the phenotypic spectrum of AAV.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>This study used a dataset of patients newly diagnosed as having GPA and MPA enrolled in five clinical trials. One cluster model included nine clinical baseline variables as input variables, and a second cluster model additionally included ANCA specificities. The clustering process involved multiple correspondence analyses followed by hierarchical ascendant cluster analysis. The clinical relevance of the generated clusters was analysed by their summary characteristics and outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The analyses involved data for 673 subjects: 396 (59%) with GPA and 277 (41%) with MPA. Both cluster models resulted in five partially redundant clusters of subjects, and the model including ANCA resulted in more pertinent separations. These clusters were named &lsquo;renal AAV with proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA&rsquo; (40% of subjects), &lsquo;renal AAV without PR3-ANCA&rsquo; (32%) and &lsquo;non-renal AAV&rsquo; (12%), &lsquo;cardiovascular AAV&rsquo; (9%) and &lsquo;gastrointestinal AAV&rsquo; (7%). The five clusters had distinct death and relapse rates. On the basis of 4 variables, 651 subjects (97%) could be accurately allocated to 1 of the 5 classes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>This analysis suggests that AAV encompasses five classes associated with different outcomes. As compared with the traditional GPA&ndash;MPA separation, this classification system may better reflect the phenotypic spectrum of AAV.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahr, A., Katsahian, S., Varet, H., Guillevin, L., Hagen, E. C., Hoglund, P., Merkel, P. A., Pagnoux, C., Rasmussen, N., Westman, K., Jayne, D. R. W., for the French Vasculitis Study Group (FVSG) and the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201750</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201750</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Vascularitis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Revisiting the classification of clinical phenotypes of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a cluster analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1003</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1010</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1011?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A vasculitis centre based management strategy leads to improved outcome in eosinophilic granulomatosis and polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss, EGPA): monocentric experiences in 150 patients]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1011?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate a vasculitis centre based management strategy for eosinophilic granulomatosis and polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss, EGPA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A retrospective cohort study at a vasculitis referral centre was performed. All EGPA patients admitted from 1990 to 2009 were included. A structured interdisciplinary work-up for proof of diagnosis, Disease Extent Index and Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score was performed. Immunosuppressive therapy was initiated and regularly adapted. Treatment targets were induction and maintenance of remission according to definitions given by the European League Against Rheumatism and the European Vasculitis Study Group. Outcomes were mortality, rate of remission, relapses, adverse events and prednisolone-dose.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Out of 269 patients with suspected EGPA 150 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of those, 104 had more than one follow-up visit resulting in a mean follow up of 53&plusmn;4.9 months. By using additional data sources the follow-up concerning survival was extended to 92&plusmn;5 month. Severe organ manifestations occurred at heart (46%), kidney (18%) and lungs (10%). Cyclophosphamide was used in 107 patients (71%). The prednisolone-doses of all patients were within the targeted range (i.e. &le;7.5mg) in 69% of the total follow-up time; the median dose at end of follow-up was 5mg/d. The 10-year survival rate was 89% resulting in mortality comparable to the general population (SMR 1.29). Only patients with cardiac failure associated with EGPA had an increased mortality (SMR 3.06).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Regular re-evaluation and target-orientated adaption of therapy may lead to normalization of life expectancy and attenuation of disease progression. Continued centre based interdisciplinary treatment should be standard of care.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moosig, F., Bremer, J. P., Hellmich, B., Holle, J. U., Holl-Ulrich, K., Laudien, M., Matthis, C., Metzler, C., Nolle, B., Richardt, G., Gross, W. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201531</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201531</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Vascularitis, Epidemiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A vasculitis centre based management strategy leads to improved outcome in eosinophilic granulomatosis and polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss, EGPA): monocentric experiences in 150 patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1011</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1017</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1018?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HLA-DRB1*04/*13 alleles are associated with vascular disease and antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1018?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background and objectives</st>
<p>Vascular disease is common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are at high risk to develop arterial and venous thrombosis. Since HLA class II genotypes have been linked to the presence of pro-thrombotic aPL, we investigated the relationship between HLA-DRB1 alleles, aPL and vascular events in SLE patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>665 SLE patients of Caucasian origin and 1403 controls were included. Previous manifestations of ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD) and venous thromboembolism (together referred to as any vascular events (AVE)) were tabulated. aPL were measured with ELISA. Two-digit HLA-DRB1 typing was performed by sequence-specific primer-PCR.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>HLA-DRB1*04 was more frequent among SLE patients with ICVD compared to unaffected patients. This association remained after adjustment for known traditional cardiovascular risk factors. HLA-DRB1*13 was associated with AVE. All measured specificities of aPL&mdash;cardiolipin IgG and IgM, &beta;<SUB>2</SUB>-glycoprotein-1 IgG, prothrombin (PT) IgG and a positive lupus anticoagulant test were associated with HLA-DRB1*04&mdash;while HLA-DRB1*13 was associated with IgG antibodies (&beta;<SUB>2</SUB>-glycoprotein-1, cardiolipin and PT). In patients with the combined risk alleles, HLA-DRB1*04/*13, there was a significant additive interaction for the outcomes AVE and ICVD.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The HLA-DRB1*04 and HLA-DRB1*13 alleles are associated with vascular events and an aPL positive immune-phenotype in SLE. Results demonstrate that a subset of SLE patients is genetically disposed to vascular vulnerability.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundstrom, E., Gustafsson, J. T., Jonsen, A., Leonard, D., Zickert, A., Elvin, K., Sturfelt, G., Nordmark, G., Bengtsson, A. A., Sundin, U., Kallberg, H., Sandling, J. K., Syvanen, A.-C., Klareskog, L., Gunnarsson, I., Ronnblom, L., Padyukov, L., Svenungsson, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201760</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201760</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Genetics, Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Systemic lupus erythematosus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HLA-DRB1*04/*13 alleles are associated with vascular disease and antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1018</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1025</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1026?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of rituximab in systemic manifestations of primary Sjogren's syndrome: results in 78 patients of the AutoImmune and Rituximab registry]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1026?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with primary Sj&ouml;gren's syndrome (pSS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The AutoImmune and Rituximab registry has included 86 patients with pSS treated with rituximab, prospectivey followed up every 6&nbsp;months for 5&nbsp;years.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Seventy-eight patients with pSS (11 men, 67 women), who already had at least one follow-up visit, were analysed. Median age was 59.8&nbsp;years (29&ndash;83), median duration of disease was 11.9&nbsp;years (3&ndash;32). Indications for treatment were systemic involvement for 74 patients and only severe glandular involvement in four patients. The median European Sj&ouml;gren's Syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI) was 11 (2&ndash;31). 17 patients were concomitantly treated with another immunosuppressant agent. Median follow-up was 34.9&nbsp;months (6&ndash;81.4) (226&nbsp;patient-years). Overall efficacy according to the treating physician was observed in 47 patients (60%) after the first cycle of rituximab. Median ESSDAI decreased from 11 (2&ndash;31) to 7.5 (0&ndash;26) (p&lt;0.0001). Median dosage of corticosteroid decreased from 17.6&nbsp;mg/day (3&ndash;60) to 10.8&nbsp;mg/day (p=0.1). Forty-one patients were retreated with rituximab. Four infusion reactions and one delayed serum sickness-like disease resulted in rituximab discontinuation. Three serious infections (1.3/100&nbsp;patient-years) and two cancer-related deaths occurred.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>In common practice, the use of rituximab in pSS is mostly restricted to patients with systemic involvement. This prospective study shows good efficacy and tolerance of rituximab in patients with pSS and systemic involvement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gottenberg, J.-E., Cinquetti, G., Larroche, C., Combe, B., Hachulla, E., Meyer, O., Pertuiset, E., Kaplanski, G., Chiche, L., Berthelot, J.-M., Gombert, B., Goupille, P., Marcelli, C., Feuillet, S., Leone, J., Sibilia, J., Zarnitsky, C., Carli, P., Rist, S., Gaudin, P., Salliot, C., Piperno, M., Deplas, A., Breban, M., Lequerre, T., Richette, P., Ghiringhelli, C., Hamidou, M., Ravaud, P., Mariette, X., for the Club Rhumatismes et Inflammations and the French Society of Rheumatology]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202293</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202293</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of rituximab in systemic manifestations of primary Sjogren's syndrome: results in 78 patients of the AutoImmune and Rituximab registry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Clinical and epidemiological research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1026</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1031</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1032?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Progression to rheumatoid arthritis in early inflammatory arthritis is associated with low IL-7 serum levels]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1032?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a challenge. Interleukin (IL)-7 is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a central role in the development and maintenance of T-cells and has been associated with T-cell dysfunction in RA. Serum levels of IL-7 are reduced in both early and established disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether serum IL-7 can identify patients with very early inflammatory joint symptoms who will progress to RA, and to examine whether IL-7 levels predict disease persistence and radiographic progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients with inflammatory joint symptoms &lt;6 months followed over 5 years for progression to RA and 80 healthy controls were studied. Baseline IL-7 levels were measured by ELISA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 250 patients, 108 developed RA (ACR 1987- criteria). IL-7 at inclusion was reduced significantly in RA compared with non-RA patients (p=0.009). IL-7 was categorised using the lower limit of the healthy control distribution (10 pg/ml). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of RA development were: antibodies against citrullinated peptides (ACPA) positivity (p=0.001), IL-7&lt;10 pg/ml (p=0.003) and swollen joint count (p=0.050). In the ACPA-negative subgroup (n=199), the only predictors were: DAS-44 (p=0.001), IL-7&lt;10 pg/ml (p=0.010) and radiographic erosions (p=0.050). At 1-year follow-up, remission (DAS&lt;1.6) was only predicted by ACPA negativity (p=0.019) and IL-7&gt;17 pg/ml at recruitment (p=0.013).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These data demonstrate that low IL-7 levels in patients with recent onset of symptoms may have value as a diagnostic biomarker predicting the progression to RA, particularly in ACPA-negative disease, as well as being related to RA progression.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goeb, V., Aegerter, P., Parmar, R., Fardellone, P., Vittecoq, O., Conaghan, P. G., Emery, P., Le Loet, X., Ponchel, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202377</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202377</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Progression to rheumatoid arthritis in early inflammatory arthritis is associated with low IL-7 serum levels]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1032</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1036</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1037?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anti-TNF treatment blocks the induction of T cell-dependent humoral responses]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1037?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Experimental and human data suggest that tumour necrosis factor (TNF) blockade may affect B cell responses, in particular the induction of T cell-dependent (TD) humoral immunity. This study aimed to assess this hypothesis directly in patients with arthritis by analysing longitudinally the effect of TNF blockade on B cell activation and the maturation of humoral responses against TD and T cell-independent vaccines.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Materials and methods</st>
<p>Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 56 spondyloarthritis patients before and after treatment with either non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) alone or TNF blockers and analysed for B cell activation, plasma cell differentiation, germinal centre versus extra-follicular B cell maturation, and somatic hypermutation. Vaccine responses to hepatitis B and <I>Streptococcus pneumoniae</I> were measured by ELISA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>TNF blockade augmented B cell activation as reflected by the expression of early activation markers, CD40, and costimulatory molecules, without affecting differentiation towards plasmablasts. This was associated with a specific increase of the unswitched fraction of circulating memory B cells and a decreased level of somatic hypermutation in anti-TNF treated patients, indicating an impairment of the germinal centre-dependent B cell maturation. In agreement with these findings, TNF blockade profoundly suppressed the response to the TD vaccination against hepatitis B, whereas the T cell-independent response against pneumococcal polysaccharides was only modestly affected.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These data indicate that TNF blockade severely impedes the induction of primary TD humoral responses, probably by interfering with the germinal centre reaction.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Franco Salinas, G., De Rycke, L., Barendregt, B., Paramarta, J. E., Hreggvidstdottir, H., Cantaert, T., van der Burg, M., Tak, P. P., Baeten, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201270</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2011-201270</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Genetics, Immunology (including allergy), Biological agents, Degenerative joint disease, Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases, Musculoskeletal syndromes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anti-TNF treatment blocks the induction of T cell-dependent humoral responses]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1037</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1043</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1044?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Autophagy contributes to inflammation in patients with TNFR-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS)]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1044?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) is caused by <I>TNFRSF1A</I> mutations, known to induce intracellular retention of the TNF&alpha; receptor 1 (TNFR1) protein, defective TNF&alpha;-induced apoptosis, and production of reactive oxygen species. As downregulation of autophagy, the main cellular pathway involved in insoluble aggregate elimination, has been observed to increase the inflammatory response, we investigated whether it plays a role in TRAPS pathogenesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The possible link between <I>TNFRSF1A</I> mutations and inflammation in TRAPS was studied in HEK-293T cells, transfected with expression constructs for wild-type and mutant TNFR1 proteins, and in monocytes derived from patients with TRAPS, by investigating autophagy function, NF-B activation and interleukin (IL)-1&beta; secretion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We found that autophagy is responsible for clearance of wild-type TNFR1, but when TNFR1 is mutated, the autophagy process is defective, probably accounting for mutant TNFR1 accumulation as well as TRAPS-associated induction of NF-B activity and excessive IL-1&beta; secretion, leading to chronic inflammation. Autophagy inhibition due to TNFR1 mutant proteins can be reversed, as demonstrated by the effects of the antibiotic geldanamycin, which was found to rescue the membrane localisation of mutant TNFR1 proteins, reduce their accumulation and counteract the increased inflammation by decreasing IL-1&beta; secretion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Autophagy appears to be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of TRAPS, an observation that provides a rationale for the most effective therapy in this autoinflammatory disorder. Our findings also suggest that autophagy could be proposed as a novel therapeutic target for TRAPS and possibly other similar diseases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bachetti, T., Chiesa, S., Castagnola, P., Bani, D., Di Zanni, E., Omenetti, A., D'Osualdo, A., Fraldi, A., Ballabio, A., Ravazzolo, R., Martini, A., Gattorno, M., Ceccherini, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201952</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201952</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Autophagy contributes to inflammation in patients with TNFR-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1044</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1052</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1053?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Granulocyte colony stimulating factor exacerbates antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1053?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is important in mobilising neutrophils from the bone marrow but also has a range of proinflammatory effects. We therefore decided to investigate the role of GCSF in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) vasculitis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We measured GCSF levels in the serum of 38 patients with active ANCA vasculitis compared with 31 age-matched controls, and assessed the effect of GCSF priming on the response of human neutrophils to ANCA. We also examined the effect of exogenous GCSF administration in a murine model of antimyeloperoxidase (anti-MPO) vasculitis, and the effect of GCSF on murine neutrophil activation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The serum levels of GCSF in patients with active ANCA vasculitis were significantly higher than those of age matched healthy controls (mean 38.04 vs 18.35&nbsp;pg/ml, p&lt;0.001). Furthermore, we demonstrated that GCSF primed human neutrophils in vitro for a respiratory burst in response to anti-MPO ANCA. In an anti-MPO antibody transfer model, mice given GCSF had more crescents (mean 29.1% vs 5.8% per glomerular cross section, p&lt;0.05), more macrophages (mean 3.2 vs 1.2 per glomerular cross-section, p&lt;0.01), higher serum creatines (mean 13.6 vs 8.3&nbsp;&mu;mol/l, p&lt;0.05) and more haematuria (p&lt;0.05) compared with controls. In vivo administration of GCSF with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), but not LPS alone, led to upregulation of CD11c on murine neutrophils.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>These data suggest that GCSF, which is raised in patient serum, may play an important role in exacerbating disease in ANCA vasculitis. In addition, GCSF therapy for neutropenia should be used with caution in these patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freeley, S. J., Coughlan, A. M., Popat, R. J., Dunn-Walters, D. K., Robson, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202160</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202160</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Vascularitis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Granulocyte colony stimulating factor exacerbates antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1053</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1058</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1059?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The concentration of anticitrullinated protein antibodies in serum and synovial fluid in relation to total immunoglobulin concentrations]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1059?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Anticitrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are one of the best predictors for the development of rheumatoid arthritis. Nonetheless, relatively little information is present on the absolute concentration of ACPA in relation to total immunoglobulin (Ig) concentrations. Such information would be of relevance to compare ACPA levels to other antibody levels. Here, we estimated the relative abundance of ACPA Ig in serum and synovial fluid using a quantitative approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>ACPA were purified using HiTrap Streptavidin columns coupled with biotinylated cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP2). Total Ig and anti-CCP2 isotype reactivities were measured by ELISA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>ACPA were successfully isolated as substantial antibody amounts were eluted from sera of ACPA-positive patients and neglectable antibody amounts were eluted from sera of ACPA-negative patients. Up to 1 in 80 IgG-molecules were estimated to be ACPA. Strikingly, IgM-ACPA was most abundant in synovial fluid (with the highest enrichment in the range of one IgM-ACPA for every eight IgM-antibodies).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>ACPA-IgG levels are estimated to be within the range of peak levels of protective antibody responses against recall antigens. IgM-ACPA is abundantly present in synovial fluid, suggesting the presence of a continuous ongoing autoimmune response in the synovial compartment.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willemze, A., Shi, J., Mulder, M., Stoeken-Rijsbergen, G., Drijfhout, J. W., Huizinga, T. W. J., Trouw, L. A., Toes, R. E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202747</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202747</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The concentration of anticitrullinated protein antibodies in serum and synovial fluid in relation to total immunoglobulin concentrations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1059</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1063</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1064?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Microarray-based gene expression profiling in patients with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes defines a disease-related signature and IL-1-responsive transcripts]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1064?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To analyse gene expression patterns and to define a specific gene expression signature in patients with the severe end of the spectrum of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS). The molecular consequences of interleukin 1 inhibition were examined by comparing gene expression patterns in 16 CAPS patients before and after treatment with anakinra.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 22 CAPS patients with active disease and from 14 healthy children. Transcripts that passed stringent filtering criteria (p values &le; false discovery rate 1%) were considered as differentially expressed genes (DEG). A set of DEG was validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR and functional studies with primary cells from CAPS patients and healthy controls. We used 17 CAPS and 66 non-CAPS patient samples to create a set of gene expression models that differentiates CAPS patients from controls and from patients with other autoinflammatory conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Many DEG include transcripts related to the regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses, oxidative stress, cell death, cell adhesion and motility. A set of gene expression-based models comprising the CAPS-specific gene expression signature correctly classified all 17 samples from an independent dataset. This classifier also correctly identified 15 of 16 post-anakinra CAPS samples despite the fact that these CAPS patients were in clinical remission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>We identified a gene expression signature that clearly distinguished CAPS patients from controls. A number of DEG were in common with other systemic inflammatory diseases such as systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The CAPS-specific gene expression classifiers also suggest incomplete suppression of inflammation at low doses of anakinra.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balow, J. E., Ryan, J. G., Chae, J. J., Booty, M. G., Bulua, A., Stone, D., Sun, H.-W., Greene, J., Barham, B., Goldbach-Mansky, R., Kastner, D. L., Aksentijevich, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202082</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202082</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Microarray-based gene expression profiling in patients with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes defines a disease-related signature and IL-1-responsive transcripts]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1064</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1070</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1071?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MiR-20a regulates ASK1 expression and TLR4-dependent cytokine release in rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1071?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To evaluate whether miR-20a belonging to the cluster miR-17&ndash;92 is a negative regulator of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) by modulating expression of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase (ASK) 1, a key component of the toll-like receptors 4 pathway, upstream of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Evaluation of miR-20a and ASK1 mRNA was performed by RT-qPCR. ASK1 protein expression was assessed by western blotting. Overexpression of miR-20a was performed by transfection of RA FLS and THP-1 cells with miR-20a mimics. Interleukin (IL)-6, CXCL-10, IL-1&beta; and TNF-&alpha; release were measured by ELISA. The role of miR-20a in vivo was assessed by IL-6 release from macrophages obtained from mice injected intraperitoneally with vectorised miR-20a mimics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>We showed that stimulation of RA FLS with lipopolysacharide (LPS) and bacterial lipoproteins (BLP) induces a drop in expression of miR-20a and that this decrease is associated with an upregulation of ASK1 expression. Using transfection of Ask1 3'UTR reporters, we demonstrate that Ask1 is a direct target of miR-20a. Overexpression of miR-20a led to a global decrease in ASK1 protein in BLP- and LPS-activated cells indicating that miR-20a regulates the expression of ASK1 at the translational level. Transfection of miR-20a mimics decreases IL-6 and CXCL10 release by RA FLS and IL-1&beta; and TNF-&alpha; by activated THP-1 cells but only in response to LPS. Last, injection of vectorised miR-20a mimics to mice led to a global decrease in ASK1 protein expression and IL-6 secretion in LPS-activated macrophages.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Our data point toward an important role for miR-20a in the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines release, by controlling ASK1 expression in RA FLS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe, L., Alsaleh, G., Pichot, A., Ostermann, E., Zuber, G., Frisch, B., Sibilia, J., Pfeffer, S., Bahram, S., Wachsmann, D., Georgel, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201654</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201654</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Genetics, Immunology (including allergy), Inflammation, Connective tissue disease, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MiR-20a regulates ASK1 expression and TLR4-dependent cytokine release in rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1071</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1079</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1080?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Notch signalling pathways mediate synovial angiogenesis in response to vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin 2]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1080?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>Notch signalling pathways are critical for angiogenesis and endothelial cell (EC) fate; however the mechanisms regulating these processes in the inflamed joint remain to be elucidated. Here, we examine whether Notch signalling mediates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin 2 (Ang2)-induced vascular function.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Notch-1 intracellular domain (Notch-1 IC), Notch-4 IC, Delta-like-ligand 4, Hes-related transcriptional repressors-1 and 2 (<I>Hrt-1</I>, <I>Hrt-2</I>) mRNA and/or protein expression was measured by Real-time PCR and/or western blot. VEGF/Ang2 induced EC function was assessed using transwell invasion chambers, matrigel tube formation assays and wound repair scratch assays &plusmn; Notch-1 siRNA or an -secretase inhibitor N-(N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl-L-alanly))-S-phenylglycine-t-Butyl Ester (DAPT) in RA synovial explants or human microvascular EC. Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were measured by ELISA and MMP2 and 9 by gelatine zymography.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Notch-1 IC and Notch-4 IC protein expressions were demonstrated in RA and psoriatic arthritis synovial biopsies, with minimal expression observed in Osteoarthritis (OA). VEGF and Ang2 induced Notch-1 IC/ Notch-4 IC protein expression in synovial explant cultures and human microvascular EC levels were further potentiated by VEGF/Ang2 stimulation in combination. Notch-1, Delta-like-ligand 4, and <I>Hrt-2</I> mRNA expression were significantly induced by VEGF and Ang2 alone and in combination. Furthermore VEGF/Ang2-induced EC invasion, angiogenesis and migration were inhibited by Notch-1 siRNA or DAPT. Conditioned media from VEGF/Ang2 stimulated RA synovial explants induced EC tube formation, an effect that was inhibited by DAPT. Finally, DAPT significantly decreased VEGF/Ang2 induced IL-6, IL-8, MMP2 and 9 expressions in RA synovial explants.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Notch-1 mediates VEGF/Ang2-induced angiogenesis and EC invasion in inflammatory arthritis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gao, W., Sweeney, C., Walsh, C., Rooney, P., McCormick, J., Veale, D. J., Fearon, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201978</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201978</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Immunology (including allergy), Pathology, Radiology, Degenerative joint disease, Musculoskeletal syndromes, Osteoarthritis, Surgical diagnostic tests, Clinical diagnostic tests]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Notch signalling pathways mediate synovial angiogenesis in response to vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin 2]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1080</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1088</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1089?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical role of the adhesion receptor DNAX accessory molecule-1 (DNAM-1) in the development of inflammation-driven dermal fibrosis in a mouse model of systemic sclerosis]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1089?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objective</st>
<p>To investigate the contribution of the adhesion receptor DNAX accessory molecule-1 (DNAM-1) in the development of dermal fibrosis on gene inactivation and targeted molecular strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Human skin expression of DNAM-1 was determined by immunohistochemistry. Mice deficient for DNAM-1 (dnam1<sup>&ndash;/&ndash;</sup>) and wild-type controls (dnam1<sup>+/+</sup>) were injected with bleomycin or NaCl. Infiltrating leucocytes, T cells, B cells and monocytes were quantified and inflammatory cytokines were measured in lesional skin of dnam1<sup>&ndash;/&ndash;</sup> and dnam1<sup>+/+</sup> mice. The anti-fibrotic potential of a DNAM-1 neutralising monoclonal antibody (mAb) was evaluated in the mouse model of bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Overexpression of DNAM-1 was detected in the skin of patients with SSc (systemic sclerosis). Dnam1<sup>&ndash;/&ndash;</sup> mice were protected from bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis with reduction of dermal thickening (75&plusmn;5%, p=0.03), hydroxyproline content (46&plusmn;8%, p=0.04) and myofibroblast counts (39&plusmn;5%, p=0.01). Moreover, the number of T cells was significantly decreased in lesional skin of dnam1<sup>&ndash;/&ndash;</sup> mice (69&plusmn;15%, p=0.0007). Dnam1<sup>&ndash;/&ndash;</sup> mice also displayed decreased levels of TNF-&alpha; and IL-6 in lesional skin. Consistent with the gene inactivation strategy, treatment of mice with DNAM-1 neutralising mAb prevented dermal fibrosis induced by bleomycin with reduction of dermal thickness (64&plusmn;6%, p=0.002), hydroxyproline content (61&plusmn;8%, p=0.004) and myofibroblast counts (83&plusmn;12%, p=0.002).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An inactivation gene strategy showed that DNAM-1 exerts profibrotic effects by controlling T cell activation and cytokine release. A molecular targeted strategy confirmed that DNAM-1 neutralising mAb has potent antifibrotic properties, supporting the hypothesis that inhibition of DNAM-1 might be a promising new approach for the treatment of SSc and potentially other related fibrotic diseases.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avouac, J., Elhai, M., Tomcik, M., Ruiz, B., Friese, M., Piedavent, M., Colonna, M., Bernhardt, G., Kahan, A., Chiocchia, G., Distler, J. H. W., Allanore, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201759</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201759</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Genetics, Immunology (including allergy), Connective tissue disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical role of the adhesion receptor DNAX accessory molecule-1 (DNAM-1) in the development of inflammation-driven dermal fibrosis in a mouse model of systemic sclerosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Basic and translational research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1089</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1098</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suppression of elevations in serum C reactive protein levels by anti-IL-6 autoantibodies in two patients with severe bacterial infections]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec> <p>Serum C reactive protein (CRP) is generally elevated by infection. We encountered two patients with severe bacterial infections without increases in CRP. Patient 1: A 67-year-old man developed thoracic empyema by <I>Escherichia coli</I> and <I>Streptococcus intermedius</I>. His body temperature was 36.6&deg;C, his leukocyte count was elevated (9960/&mu;l) and he was negative for CRP (0.01&nbsp;mg/dl). Despite antibiotic treatment, he died of respiratory failure. Patient 2: A 56-year-old woman developed multiple subcutaneous abscesses by <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I>. She had rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for 30&nbsp;years and was treated with sodium aurothiomalate. Her body temperature was 37.4&deg;C, and leukocyte count (5600/&mu;l) and CRP (0.05&nbsp;mg/dl) were not elevated. She recovered with antibiotics. Neither patient had a past history of severe bacterial infection.</p> <p>Since serum CRP is mainly controlled by interleukin (IL)-6,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> the lack of IL-6 function was suggested. Serum IL-6 was not detected by ELISA in either patient, although it is known...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nanki, T., Onoue, I., Nagasaka, K., Takayasu, A., Ebisawa, M., Hosoya, T., Shirai, T., Sugihara, T., Hirata, S., Kubota, T., Harigai, M., Miyasaka, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202768</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202768</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suppression of elevations in serum C reactive protein levels by anti-IL-6 autoantibodies in two patients with severe bacterial infections]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1102</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1102?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development and resolution of secondary autoimmunity after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus: competition of plasma cells for survival niches?]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1102?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment for severe autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202729R1">1</cross-ref> However, it is increasingly recognised that these patients have an added propensity to develop secondary autoimmune disorders.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202729R2">2</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202729R3">3</cross-ref></p> <p>Here, we report on a 21-year-old male patient who received a CD34-selected autologous HSCT following conditioning with antithymocyte-globulin and cyclophosphamide (CYC) after written informed consent for refractory, severe SLE with renal, haematological, mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal manifestations (SLEDAI 19).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202729R1">1</cross-ref> Clinical remission was achieved for SLE within 3&nbsp;months after HSCT and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies disappeared despite immunosuppressive drug withdrawal. Eight months after HSCT, the patient presented with spontaneous joint and skin bleeding and was diagnosed with factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor haemophilia with an activated partial thromboplastin time &gt;100&nbsp;s, FVIII activity &lt;1% and a FVIII inhibitor titre of 435 Bethesda units (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="ANNRHEUMDIS2012202729F1">figure 1</cross-ref>A). At...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander, T., Schneider, S., Hoyer, B., Cheng, Q., Thiel, A., Ziemer, S., Burmester, G.-R., Arnold, R., Radbruch, A., Hiepe, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202729</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202729</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development and resolution of secondary autoimmunity after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus: competition of plasma cells for survival niches?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1104</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1104?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ankylosing spondylitis patients with and without psoriasis do not differ in disease phenotype]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1104?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec> <p>Psoriasis is an important clinical feature in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) in general,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R1">1</cross-ref> with inflammatory spinal disease developing in 5%&ndash;25% of psoriasis cases.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R2">2</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R3">3</cross-ref> However, there have been few studies assessing the differences between AS patients with and without concomitant psoriasis.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R4">4&ndash;9</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R5"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R6"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R7"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R8"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R9"></cross-ref></p> <p>Our aim was to compare the demographic, clinical and imaging characteristics between AS patients with and without psoriasis. Baseline data from an 80% random sample of the AS Study for the Evaluation of Recombinant Infliximab Therapy (ASSERT) database were used for this analysis. Details of the ASSERT trial and study population have been previously published.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202922R10">10</cross-ref> Briefly, patients with active AS (fulfilling modified New York criteria) for at least 3&nbsp;months, a Bath AS disease activity index score of at least 4 (range 0&ndash;10) and a spinal...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Machado, P., Landewe, R., Braun, J., Baraliakos, X., Hermann, K.-G. A., Hsu, B., Baker, D., van der Heijde, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202922</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202922</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ankylosing spondylitis patients with and without psoriasis do not differ in disease phenotype]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1107</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1107?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neuropeptides activate TRPV1 in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes and foster IL-6 and IL-8 production]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1107?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec id="annrheumdis-2012-202846s1"> <p>Neurogenic inflammation is caused by neuropeptides which are released by peripheral neurons and induce inflammatory signals. Two of the main neuropeptides involved are substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP),<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202846R1">1</cross-ref> both acting through several molecular mechanisms including activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) cation channels, particularly TRPV1 (also called vanilloid receptor type 1 or capsaicin (CAP) receptor).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202846R2">2</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202846R3">3</cross-ref> SP and CGRP have been found increased in synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202846R4">4</cross-ref> <cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202846R5">5</cross-ref> and may induce the production of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 in RA synoviocytes,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202846R6">6</cross-ref> suggesting that neuropeptides may have a role in joint inflammation during RA. Interestingly, TRPV cation channels are expressed in various non-neuronal cell types and, recently, they have been found expressed in human synoviocytes.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202846R7">7</cross-ref></p> <p>No previous study has investigated the possible link among SP,...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terenzi, R., Romano, E., Manetti, M., Peruzzi, F., Nacci, F., Matucci-Cerinic, M., Guiducci, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202846</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202846</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neuropeptides activate TRPV1 in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes and foster IL-6 and IL-8 production]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1109</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[First report of vertical transmission of a somatic NLRP3 mutation in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) are rare autoinflammatory diseases caused by dominantly inherited or de novo gain-of-function <I>NLRP3</I> mutations. They include familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome, Muckle-Wells syndrome and chronic infantile neurological, cutaneous and articular syndrome.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202913R1">1</cross-ref> The <I>NLRP3</I> gene encodes cryopyrin, a key component of the cytosolic complex termed inflammasome, which generates the active form of interleukin (IL)-1&szlig;. Previous studies showed an uncontrolled IL-1&szlig; overproduction in CAPS, representing the basis from which to treat these patients with IL-1 blockade.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202913R1">1&ndash;3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202913R2"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202913R3"></cross-ref></p> <p>The important role of somatic <I>NLRP3</I> mutations in CAPS has been recently shown.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="annrheumdis-2012-202913R4">4</cross-ref> However, as occurs in most Mendelian diseases, no data are available concerning the presence of low-level somatic <I>NLRP3</I> mosaicism in parents of CAPS patients. To address this issue we performed massively parallel DNA sequencing using a GS Junior 454 platform in selected families from our unit. The inclusion criteria...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimenez-Trevino, S., Gonzalez-Roca, E., Ruiz-Ortiz, E., Yague, J., Ramos, E., Arostegui, J. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202913</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202913</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[First report of vertical transmission of a somatic NLRP3 mutation in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letters</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1110</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1110?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1110?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec id="s1">
<p>Khodzhigorova A, Distler A, Lang V, <I>et al.</I> Inhibition of sumoylation prevents experimental fibrosis. <I>Ann Rheum Dis</I> 2012;<b>71</b>:1904&ndash;8. In panel A of figure 3 there are three histological images. The image on the left is from AdLacZ control mouse treated with a non-targeting siRNA, while the image on the right is from a genetically modified AdTBR mouse treated with siRNA against ubc9. However, the two histological pictures are identical to each other. The correct image of AdLacZ control mice treated with non-targeting siRNA is shown below.<cross-ref type="fig" refid="FIG1"></cross-ref></p>
<p>
<fig loc="float" id="FIG1">
<link locator="annrheumdis2012201746corr1f01"></fig>
</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201746corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-201746corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1110</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1110-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://ard.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/72/6/1110-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Schoels MM, van der Heijde D, Breedveld FC, <I>et al.</I> Blocking the effects of interleukin-6 in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory rheumatic diseases: systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing a consensus statement. <I>Ann Rheum Dis</I> 2013;<b>72</b>:583&ndash;9. The author &lsquo;Miho M Murikama&rsquo; should be &lsquo;Miho Murakami.&rsquo;</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-10T01:37:07-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202470corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:annrheumdis;annrheumdis-2012-202470corr1</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Corrections</prism:section>
<prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>1110</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>1110</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>