Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

Hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: is screening necessary?

BMJ 1998; 316 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7133.716 (Published 07 March 1998) Cite this as: BMJ 1998;316:716

Intensive screening is not necessary at normal doses

  1. Chris Blyth, Senior registrar in ophthalmology,
  2. Carol Lane, Consultant ophthalmologist
  1. Cardiff Eye Unit, University Hospital of Wales Healthcare NHS Trust, Cardiff CF4 4XW

    The 4-aminoquinolines (chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine) are used as second line agents for their disease modifying effect in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. The association between chloroquine therapy and pigmentary maculopathy has been known since 1959.1 The manufacturer's datasheet suggests that all patients receiving hydroxychloroquine should undergo an ophthalmic examination, including a central visual field test, at least twice a year. If implemented this recommendation would have a noticeable impact on the ophthalmic service. Is it necessary?

    The earliest sign of chloroquine retinopathy is a paracentral scotoma. This so called premaculopathy can be detected with an Amsler chart.2 Later, subtle pigmentary mottling develops at the macula, and this may progress to the characteristic bull's eye maculopathy and widespread retinal pigment epithelial atrophy. In its early stages chloroquine retinopathy is reversible by stopping the drug.3 Hydroxychloroquine given at currently prescribed doses is thought to be less toxic than chloroquine.

    The recommended dose for hydroxychloroquine is 6.5 mg/kg lean body weight per day.4 In their prospective study of 73 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine for at least 18 months, Morsman et al reported one case of possible toxic retinopathy—and this patient had received twice the recommended daily dose.5 In a retrospective study of 82 patients taking hydroxychloroquine for over a year (mean 38.6 months) Spalton et al found no cases of retinopathy.6 No correlation was present between the computerised visual field indices and any measure of increasing drug exposure. The authors concluded that visual field testing was unnecessary in these patients.6 Bernstein analysed all published cases and Food and Drug Administration reports of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. He found no evidence of permanent visual loss among more than 1500 patients who did not exceed the recommended daily dosage for up to 10 years.7 More recently, however, two well documented cases of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy have been reported in patients treated for 6.5 and 8 years without exceeding the recommended maximum daily dose.8

    The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' guidelines for managing patients receiving hydroxychloroquine recommend a baseline ophthalmic examination at the start of treatment, including best corrected visual acuity, fundoscopy, and a central visual field test.9 Thereafter the prescribing medical practitioner should be responsible for any screening considered necessary. Patients should be warned to report any visual disturbance and may be given an Amsler chart to use on a monthly basis. No further ophthalmic examination is necessary unless the patient becomes symptomatic.

    Current evidence suggests that hydroxychloroquine retinopathy is extremely rare if the recommended dose is not exceeded. In most cases a baseline ophthalmic assessment and issue of an Amsler chart with instructions on its use will suffice. The small number of patients who have received hydroxychloroquine for longer than six years should be kept under ophthalmic review until more information is available about the safety of long term treatment.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.