Skip to main content
Log in

Familial history, age and smoking are important risk factors for disc degeneration disease in Arabic pedigrees

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study used computed tomography imaging to evaluate the extent and pattern of the intergenerational transmission of spinal disc degeneration disease (DDD) in complex pedigrees. Contribution of a number of the potential covariates was also studied using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, as well as two types of complex segregation analysis models. Among 161 individuals studied, DDD was diagnosed in 60 individuals. The number of protruded discs varied from 1 to 4, mostly in lumbar or lumbosacral regions. The average age at onset of the disease was similar for both women (36.0 years) and men (34.8 years). The proportion of the individuals affected by the DDD status of their parents ranged from 10% in families of two healthy parents to 55.5% of two affected parents (p < 0.01). The results of the logistic regression analyses and complex segregation analysis were qualitatively the same: DDD status of parents, age and smoking were the main risk factors for disc herniation in the Arabic families we examined. All analyses showed a predominating role of the family history as a risk factor for DDD in offsprings. It showed, for example, four times higher risk at age 50 for individuals with two affected parents vs. those who have two non-affected parents. However, the results of models-fitting genetic analysis, did not confirm a monogenic Mendelian pattern of inheritance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams GC, Hamblen DL. Outline of Orthopaedics. London: Churchill Livingstone Chap. 10; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams MA, Hutton WC. Gradual disc prolapse. Spine 1985; 10: 524–531.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matsui H, Kanamrai M, Ishihara H, Yudoh K, Naruse Y, Tsuji H. Familial predisposition for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Spine 1998; 23: 1029–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sambrook PN, MacGregor AJ, Spector TD. Genetic influences on cervical and lumbar disc degeneration. A magnetic resonance imaging study in twins. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 366–372.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoo K, Origitano TC. Familial cervical spondylosis. Case report. Neurosurgery 1998; 89: 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gunzburg R, Fraser R, Fraser GA. Lumbar intervertebral disc prolabse in teenage twins. Bone Jt Surg (Br) 1990; 72: 914–916.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bijkerk C, Houing-Duistermaat JJ, Valkenburg HA, et al. Heritabilities of radiologic osteoarthritis in periferal joints and of disc degeneration of the spine. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1729–1735.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lemeshow S, Hosmer D. A review ofgoodness of fit statistic for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiology 1982; 115: 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mickey J, Greenland S. A study of the impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiology 1989; 129: 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elston RC. Segregation analysis. Adv Hum Genet 1981; 11: 63–120.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ginsburg E, Livshits G. Segregation analysis of quantitative traits. A review. Ann Hum Biol 1999; 26: 103–129.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morton NE. Outline of Genetic Epidemiology. Basel: Karger, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. SAGE. Statistical analysis for genetic epidemiology. Computer program package available from the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cleveland, Oh: Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 1997.

  14. Bonney GE. Regressive logistic models for familial disease and other binary traits. Biometrics 1986; 42: 611–625.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elston RC, Stewart J. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered 1971; 21: 523–542.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Go RCP, King MC, Bailey-Wilson JE, Elston RC, Lynch HT. Genetic epidemiology of breast and associated cancers in high risk families. I. Segregation analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1983; 71: 455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hanson RL, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH, et al. Familial relationships between obesity and non-insulin-dipendent diabetis mellitus. Diabetis 1995; 44: 418–422.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Elston RC, George VT. Age of onest age at examination and other covariates in the analysis of family data. Genet Epidemiol 1989; 6: 217–220.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Lamminen A, Viikari-Juntura E. Lumbar disc degeneration in relation to occupation. Scand J Work Environ Health 1998; 24: 358–366.

    Google Scholar 

  20. An Hs, Silveri CP, Simpson JM, et al. Comparison of smoking habits between patients with surgically confirmed herniated lumbar and cervical disc disease and controls. J Spinal Disord 1994; 7: 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Battie MC, Videman T, Gill K, et al. Smoking and lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: An MRI study ofidentical twins. Spine 1991; 16: 1015–1021.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jarvinen P, Aho K. Twin studies in rheumatic disease. Semin Arthritis Rheu 1994; 24: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Postacchini F, Lami R, Pugliese O. Familial predisposition to discogenic low-back pain. Spine 1988; 13: 1403–1406.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sham P. Statistics in Human Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livshits, G., Cohen, Z., Higla, O. et al. Familial history, age and smoking are important risk factors for disc degeneration disease in Arabic pedigrees. Eur J Epidemiol 17, 643–651 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015503329989

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015503329989

Navigation