Clinical pharmacokinetics of TNF antagonists: How do they differ?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2005.01.004Get rights and content

The relationship between the dose administered and the observed beneficial or adverse effects of a drug is one of the basic concepts of clinical pharmacology. The broad term “exposure” usually refers to the dose and the various acute or integrated measures of the resulting concentrations in blood (plasma, serum) and/or tissues/fluids. The term “response” refers to any direct measure of the pharmacologic effect (beneficial or otherwise) of the drug. Thus, as specified in a recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry (2004), “… a drug can be determined to be safe and effective only when the relationship of beneficial and adverse effect to a defined exposure is known.” Consequently, there has been a recent strong academic, industrial, and regulatory interest in exploring and characterizing the exposure-response relationships of existing and developed drugs. The first part of the cascade exposure, response cascade, is the relationship between the administered dose and the observed concentration-time profiles in the organism of interest, often referred to as pharmacokinetics (PK). The second part is the relationship between the concentration levels and the observed pharmacodynamic (PD) responses, often called PK-PD relationship. Within the causal chain of events after a drug is administered, the exposure (or PK) precedes the effect (or PD). Therefore, whenever any differentiation in the beneficial and/or adverse effects between drugs with similar mechanisms of action is observed, the underlying clinical PK is among the first considerations. The purpose of the current article is to review the PK properties of the 3 existing marketed tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, adalimumab (Abbott Laboratories), etanercept (Amgen Inc.), and infliximab (Centocor, Inc.), and to discuss the potential clinical implications of any PK differences.

Section snippets

Clinical pharmacokinetics of TNF antagonists

The “therapeutic window” paradigm provides the context in which the PK properties of 3 TNF antagonists are reviewed in this section. Only publicly available information has been used for the review.

Discussion

The existence of a causal relationship between exposure (PK) and response (efficacy and safety) means that if differences in the efficacy and safety characteristics among the 3 TNF antagonists are observed, the underlying differences in PK are the starting points for consideration. The differences in the observed concentration-time profiles of the drugs and the exposure characteristics derived from them are induced either by differences of the inherent properties of the molecules (ie, binding

References (30)

  • HUMIRA™ (adalimumab) Patient Information

    (2003)
  • R.G. Granneman et al.

    Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships of adalimumab (HUMIRA™) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients during phase II/III clinical trials

    (2003)
  • D.M. Chen et al.

    Adalimumab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasisPreliminary findings from a 12-week dose ranging trial

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2004)
  • V.M. Awni et al.

    Steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of adalimumab (HUMIRA™) following 40 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection every other week (eow) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with and without methotrexate (MTX) background therapy

    (2003)
  • R.B. Velagapudi et al.

    The effect of methotrexate (MTX) coadministration on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of adalimumab (HUMIRA™) following a single intravenous injection to rheumatoid arthritis patients

    (2003)
  • Cited by (177)

    • Rheumatoid arthritis: advances in treatment strategies

      2023, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This manuscript was prepared during the employment of the author with Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA.

    View full text