6
Joint hypermobility

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2003.08.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Joint hypermobility is an area of neglect in rheumatology. That is not to say it is overlooked by rheumatologists. It is spotted when sought, but for many unfortunate patients, here the story ends. The act of recognition becomes the goal in itself rather than the medium through which effective therapy can be provided. This chapter serves to reinforce the clinical and epidemiological importance of a common disorder whose significance is under-appreciated and impact largely ignored. In contradistinction to our earlier chapter, published in 2000, which took for its remit the heritable disorders of connective tissue in general, the current one focuses on the commonly encountered (so-called benign) joint hypermobility syndrome, its recognition, epidemiology, clinical features and management according to the most recent literature.

Section snippets

The prevalence of hypermobility and the hypermobility syndrome

It is important to distinguish hypermobility, which describes the often asymptomatic increased range of joint or spinal movement, from hypermobility syndrome, its symptomatic counterpart. Population studies demonstrate a wide variation in the prevalence of joint hypermobility; its presence is influenced by age, gender and ethnicity. Hypermobility diminishes with age from childhood onward, is about three times more common in females than males and is seen more often in Asian and African races

Hypermobility as an asset

Greater agility provided by joint laxity may favour performing artists, where the prevalence of hypermobility is significantly higher than that of the general population. It appears that hypermobility acts as a positive selection factor for entry into ballet for both girls and boys. Polyarticular hypermobility is seen in this group as well as in adult dancers in as many as 90%.16 Hypermobile violinists, flautists and pianists (of all ages) with lax finger and/or wrist joints suffer less pain

Identifying hypermobility

The conventional method of identifying hypermobility, irrespective of cause, is to apply the Beighton nine-point scoring system established in 1973. This requires the performance of number of manoeuvres listed in Table 1. Conventionally, an arbitrary number of four or more out of nine is taken to be diagnostic of ‘generalized’ hypermobility.

This Beighton nine-point score is widely used as a clinical screening test for hypermobility. However, it cannot be relied upon to identify pauciarticular

What is the JHS?

Many authorities nowadays believe that JHS, as manifest in patients seeking medical help, is almost certainly identical with the EDS hypermobility type (formerly EDS type III).1 This question, however, is controversial and will be satisfactorily resolved only when the precise genetic basis of both conditions has been established. The term ‘benign’ denotes a normal life expectancy and, in effect, the absence of cardiac and arterial disorders, a lesser tendency towards osteoporosis and milder

Presenting symptoms in the JHS

JHS patients may present with a wide variety of musculoskeletal symptoms encompassing spine, joint, ligament, muscle, tendon and bone, and at first sight, appear no different from other rheumatology patients. What set JHS patients apart are the unusual frequency, range and number of lesions at any one time or over the life span of the patient. The most common symptom is pain. This ranges from localized (often recurrent) acute pain, perhaps a consequence of tissue injury or overuse, to chronic

ManagEment

The approach recommended here is the one adopted in the hypermobility clinics established by the authors at the University College London Hospitals and at Whipps Cross University Hospital. The approach to management is of necessity a multidisciplinary one but remaining holistic in its outlook. Each patient with JHS will have their own individual set of clinical problems and will require an individualized treatment plan tailored to particular needs.

Our strategy is to

  • 1.

    treat the treatable

Summary

This chapter draws readers' attention to a poorly understood backwater of rheumatology, the HDCTs, and, in particular, to a common, debilitating but under-recognized condition, the JHS. Hopefully, it will enable rheumatologists and others to familiarize themselves with its not inconsiderable significance, the nature of its variegated clinical manifestations, its prognosis and its effective treatment.

References (52)

  • R Grahame

    Joint hypermobility and genetic collagen disorders: are they related?

    Archives of Disease in Childhood

    (1999)
  • J.H Kirk et al.

    The hypermobility syndrome

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1967)
  • M.B Mishra et al.

    Extra-articular features of benign joint hypermobility syndrome

    British Journal of Rheumatology

    (1996)
  • R Grahame

    Pain, distress and joint hyperlaxity

    Joint, Bone, Spine

    (2000)
  • R Grahame et al.

    British consultant rheumatologists’ perceptions about the hypermobility syndrome: a national survey (see comments)

    Rheumatology

    (2001)
  • R Grahame

    Time to take hypermobility seriously (in adults and children)

    Rheumatology

    (2001)
  • S Gurley-Green

    Living with the hypermobility syndrome

    Rheumatology

    (2001)
  • K.J Murray et al.

    Benign joint hypermobility in childhood

    Rheumatology

    (2001)
  • Z Al Rawi et al.

    Joint mobility among university students in Iraq

    British Journal of Rheumatology

    (1985)
  • L.-G Larsson et al.

    Hypermobility: prevalence and features in a Swedish population

    British Journal of Rheumatology

    (1993)
  • D.G Rikken-Bultman et al.

    Hypermobility in two Dutch school populations

    European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

    (1997)
  • A.J Bridges et al.

    Joint hypermobility in adults referred to rheumatology clinics

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1992)
  • P Klemp et al.

    Hypermobility in New Zealand (multiple letters) [8]

    Rheumatology

    (2003)
  • M McCormack et al.

    A study of joint laxity and the impact of the benign joint hypermobilty syndrome in student and professional ballet dancers

    Journal of Rheumatology

    (2003)
  • L.-G Larsson et al.

    Benefits and disadvantages of joint hypermobility among musicians

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1993)
  • L.C Decoster et al.

    Prevalence and features of joint hypermobility among adolescent athletes

    Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

    (1997)
  • Cited by (259)

    • Biomechanical and bioelasticity analysis of the hypermobile knee

      2023, Cartilage Tissue and Knee Joint Biomechanics: Fundamentals, Characterization and Modelling
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text