Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Journal-based CME articleActivity Pacing, Avoidance, Endurance, and Associations With Patient Functioning in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Section snippets
Statement of Need
The way in which an individual with chronic pain habitually approaches activity engagement has long been thought to have an impact on his/her daily functioning. The premise that both avoidance of one's daily activities and overactivity (activity engagement that significantly exacerbates pain) are linked to functional decline is widely documented, with activity pacing thought to be a positive pain coping strategy.
However, evidence presented in previously published literature reviews highlights
Accreditation Statement
This journal-based activity has been planned and developed in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the sponsorship of Professional Education Services Group (PESG).
PESG is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education (CME) for physicians.
Credit Designation Statement
PESG designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 2.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
All other health care professionals completing continuing education credit for this activity will be issued a certificate of participation.
Educational Objectives
To support the attainment of knowledge, competence, and performance, the learner should be able to achieve the following objectives:
- 1
Describe the available evidence for a direct link between avoidance of activity and patient functioning in chronic pain.
- 2
Discuss the evidence of both positive and inverse associations between measures of endurance and patient functioning in chronic pain.
- 3
Discuss possible explanations for links between pacing and patient functioning in chronic pain.
Planning Committee
Nicole E. Andrews, BOccThy Hon 1; Jenny Strong, PhD; Pamela J. Meredith, PhD; Leighton Chan, MD, MPH; PESG staff.
Faculty Profiles & Disclosure Information
As a sponsor accredited by the ACCME, it is the policy of PESG to require the disclosure of anyone who is in a position to control the content of an educational activity. All relevant financial relationships with any commercial interests and/or manufacturers must be disclosed to participants at the beginning of each activity. The faculty of this educational activity disclose the following:
Nicole E. Andrews, BOccThy Hon 1
The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland, Australia
No financial conflicts to disclose.
Jenny Strong, PhD
The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland, Australia
No financial conflicts to disclose.
Pamela J. Meredith, PhD
The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland, Australia
No financial conflicts to disclose.
Leighton Chan, MD, MPH
Deputy Editor, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bethesda, MD
No financial conflicts to disclose.
PESG Staff
No financial conflicts to disclose.
Resolution of Conflict of Interest
PESG has implemented a process to resolve conflict of interest for each CME activity. In order to help ensure content objectivity, independence, and fair balance, and to ensure that the content is aligned with the interest of the public, PESG has resolved the conflict by external content review.
Unapproved/Off-Label Use Disclosure
PESG requires CME faculty to disclose to the participants:
- 1
When products or procedures being discussed are off-label, unlabeled, experimental, and/or investigational (not US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] approved); and
- 2
Any limitations on the information presented, such as data that are preliminary or that represent ongoing research, interim analyses, and/or unsupported opinion. Faculty may discuss information about pharmaceutical agents that is outside of FDA-approved labeling. This
Intended Audience
This program is intended for physicians and healthcare professionals responsible for the comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Method of Participation
In order to claim credit, participants must complete the following:
- 1
Pre-activity self-assessment questions
- 2
Read the activity
- 3
Complete the CME Test and Evaluation. Participants must achieve a score of 70% on the CME Test.
Participants can complete the pre-activity self-assessment and CME Test and Evaluation online by logging on to http://acrm.cds.pesgce.com. Upon successful completion of the online tests and evaluation form, you can instantly download and print your certificate of credit.
To better
CME Inquiries
For all CME certificate inquiries, please contact us at [email protected].
This continuing education activity is active starting November 1, 2012 and will expire October 31, 2013.
Estimated Time to Complete This Activity: 2.0 hours
Inclusion Criteria
To be included in this review, studies had to (1) be written in English, (2) report on a participant group of adults (>18y) with chronic pain (>3mo), (3) include at least 1 measure of 1 of the 3 approaches to activity (endurance, pacing, or avoidance) that measured patient behavior (not purely cognitions), (4) include at least 1 criterion measure of patient functioning (pain intensity, physical disability, or psychological functioning), and (5) report correlation coefficients (Pearson's r or
Study Selection
The process of study selection is presented in figure 1. Of the 1441 records identified through searches, 832 duplicate records were identified and removed. The remaining 609 abstracts were screened for eligibility. It was evident from abstract screening that 237 records did not examine the relationship between an approach to activity and patient functioning. A further 112 records were publication types that were ineligible for random-effects modeling (eg, a literature review). A number of
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the relationship between different approaches to activity and patient functioning in chronic pain. Based on theoretical work, it was hypothesized that (1) both avoidance and endurance would be linked to poorer functioning and more pain and (2) pacing would be associated with less pain and higher levels of patient functioning. The results of this study were, however, mixed in their
Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine associations between different approaches to activity and patient functioning in chronic pain. Results provide support for associations between avoidance of activity and poorer outcomes including increased pain, poorer psychological functioning, and more disability. The relationship between endurance and functioning appeared to be dependent on the measure used. While persisting with activity in
References (74)
- et al.
Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception
Behav Res Ther
(1983) - et al.
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art
Pain
(2000) - et al.
The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: development and preliminary validation
Pain
(1995) - et al.
The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment
Pain
(1983) Attentional control of pain and the process of chronification
Prog Brain Res
(2000)- et al.
A structured review of the evidence for pacing as a chronic pain intervention
Eur J Pain
(2009) - et al.
The role of avoidance, pacing, and other activity patterns in chronic pain
Pain
(2007) - et al.
An activity pacing scale for the chronic pain coping inventory: development in a sample of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Pain
(2001) - et al.
Use of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory to assess older adults' pain coping strategies
J Pain
(2006) - et al.
Active avoidance but not activity pacing is associated with disability in fibromyalgia
Pain
(2009)
Cognitions, coping, and social environment predict adjustment to pain in spinal cord injury
J Pain
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Pain
Further validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory
J Pain
Pain in cerebral palsy: the relation of coping strategies to adjustment
Pain
Coping with fibromialgia: usefulness of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42
Pain
One- and two-item measures of pain beliefs and coping strategies
Pain
Chronic pain coping measures: individual vs. composite scores
Pain
“Being” in pain: the role of self-discrepancies in the emotional experience and activity patterns of patients with chronic low back pain
Pain
Exploratory factor analysis of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale in patients with chronic pain complaints
Pain
Coping or acceptance: what to do about chronic pain?
Pain
Clinical assessment of behavioral coping responses: preliminary results from a brief inventory
Eur J Pain
The assessment of anxiety and fear in persons with chronic pain: a comparison of instruments
Behav Res Ther
The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale: development and validation of a scale to measure fear of pain
Pain
Psychosocial factors associated with pain intensity, pain-related interference, and psychological functioning in persons with multiple sclerosis and pain
Pain
Determinants of health-related quality of life in patients with persistent somatoform pain disorder
Eur J Pain
The effects of behavioural treatment on chronic pain
Behav Res Ther
The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42: reliability and validity
Pain
The development and preliminary validation of the Profile of Chronic Pain: Extended Assessment Battery
Pain
Coping with chronic pain: a comparison of two measures
Pain
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ-D)
J Pain
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (ChCPCI) in a Hong Kong Chinese population
J Pain
Anxiety sensitivity in the prediction of pain-related fear and anxiety in a heterogeneous chronic pain population
Behav Res Ther
The components of pain behaviour report
Behav Res Ther
Daily fatigue in women with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia
Pain
Activity patterns in chronic pain: underlying dimensions and associations with disability and depressed mood
J Pain
Fear-avoidance- and endurance-related responses to pain: development and validation of the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ)
Eur J Pain
Coping with chronic pain: a guide to patient self-management
Cited by (0)
In-press corrected proof published online on Aug 17, 2012, at www.archives-pmr.org.
Supported by a Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation Scholarship and the Cramond Fellowship in Occupational Therapy and Pain Management at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.