Research ArticleMotivational Counseling to Reduce Sitting Time: A Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial in Adults
Introduction
Recent evidence1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 suggests that sedentary behavior may be a distinct risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, independent of leisure-time moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The detrimental health effects of sedentary behaviors (e.g., during TV viewing)1, 3, 5, 10, 11 and overall sitting during the day2, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13 have been shown in observational studies. Additionally, the number of breaks in sitting time may be inversely associated with the cardiometabolic risk profile.14
It has been proposed that targeting increased participation in MVPA may not be sufficient to offset the health hazards associated with excessive sitting. In a group of healthy middle-aged and elderly women, participation in sustained 10-minute bouts of objectively measured MVPA was unrelated to objectively measured duration of daily sitting time.15 Recent experimental studies also suggest that neither recommended levels of MVPA16 nor restricted energy intake17 can fully compensate the negative cardiometabolic health effects of sitting.
Sedentary behavior is defined as “any waking behavior characterized by an energy expenditure ≤1.5 METs while in a sitting or reclining position.”18 Adults in Western societies spend 45%–60% of their waking hours in sedentary pursuits, a stark contrast to the small proportion of total time spent in MVPA (5%).19, 20, 21, 22 Reduction of sitting time therefore represents a potential target for promotion of health and prevention of chronic disease.
Recently, a number of studies23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 have reported on the effects of interventions aimed at reducing and breaking up sedentary time in different settings and populations. Generally, studies have been small-scale feasibility studies with theory-based behavioral interventions,26, 27 short-term experimental studies,24, 28 or worksite intervention studies conducted in small convenience samples.23, 25, 29
These studies23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 have shown that reduction of sitting time is possible, with reductions ranging from 3%–4% of total daily sitting time26, 27 up to approximately 25% of working hours.23, 25, 29 Additionally, positive cardiometabolic effects have been observed in some studies.23, 24 However, there is a need for randomized trials conducted in population-based study samples to confirm that the possible beneficial effects of reducing sitting time are achievable in community settings and to obtain unbiased estimates of the effects on various health outcomes.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of an individually tailored, theory-based, motivational counseling intervention on objectively measured sitting time, number of breaks in sitting time, anthropometric measures, and cardiometabolic biomarkers, in a population-based sample of sedentary adult men and women. We hypothesized that daily sitting time could be reduced, the number of breaks in sitting time could be increased, and cardiometabolic biomarkers and anthropometric measures could be improved.
Section snippets
Setting and Participants
Participants for the present RCT, the Sedentary Intervention Trial (SIT), were consecutively recruited from The Health2010 study, a population-based epidemiologic study carried out at The Research Centre for Prevention and Health (RCPH). A random sample of 3,762 men and women aged between 18 and 69 years and living in ten municipalities in the Western part of the Capital Region of Denmark was initially drawn through the Danish Civil Registration Office.
The Health2010 participants (N=1,522,
Participant Flow and Baseline Characteristics
During the inclusion period, 689 Health2010 participants were assessed for eligibility. Among these, 299 (43% of participants assessed for eligibility) met eligibility criteria (Figure 1) and 171 (57% of eligible participants) initially consented to participate and started the 7-day baseline ActivPAL monitoring period. Five participants withdrew after initially accepting participation, but before randomization, one because of a skin reaction to the adhesive ActivPAL PAL stickie and four
Discussion
In this population-based study sample of community-dwelling adults, a 6-month, individually tailored, theory-based intervention program aimed at reducing daily sitting time was effective for improving cardiometabolic biomarkers. The overall sitting time was reduced by 2.9% in the intervention group, although this was not statistically different compared to the control group. However, standing time significantly increased in the intervention group and fasting serum insulin level, HOMA-IR, and
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank all the participants who choose to be a part of the present study in addition to their participation in the Health2010 study. The work was supported by the Health Insurance Foundation (Helsefonden, Grant No. 2012B233) and the Lundbeck Foundation (Grant No. j.nr. 14/2010). D.W. Dunstan is supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship.
The authors declare that there was no racial or gender bias in the selection of participants.
No financial disclosures were
References (44)
- et al.
Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996–2011
Am J Prev Med
(2011) - et al.
Effects of 1 day of inactivity on insulin action in healthy men and women: interaction with energy intake
Metabolism
(2011) - et al.
The descriptive epidemiology of sitting. A 20-country comparison using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Am J Prev Med
(2011) - et al.
Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors and cause-specific mortality in U.S. adults
Am J Clin Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Sit–stand workstations: a pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time
Am J Prev Med
(2012) - et al.
Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial
Am J Prev Med
(2012) - et al.
Feasibility of reducing older adults’ sedentary time
Am J Prev Med
(2011) - et al.
Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention
Prev Med
(2013) - et al.
Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial
Am J Clin Nutr
(2013) - et al.
Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab)
Circulation
(2010)