Review
Leflunomide: an immunomodulatory drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0162-3109(00)00191-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Leflunomide (Arava™) has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The drug, due to its protective effects on structural joint damage, has been classified as a disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Leflunomide is structurally dissimilar from other drugs currently used to treat RA and exhibits a different mechanism of action. It has shown to be protective in a variety of animal models of arthritis and autoimmunity based on its immunomodulatory activity. Leflunomide is rapidly converted in vivo to its pharmacologically active metabolite A77 1726. This metabolite is a potent non-cytotoxic inhibitor of the enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), a key enzyme in the de novo synthesis of uridine monophosphate (UMP). Activated lymphocytes depend on the pyrimidine de novo syntheses to fulfill their metabolic needs for clonal expansion and terminal differentiation into effector cells. De novo synthesis of pyrimidines is not only essential to provide precursors for new RNA and DNA synthesis, but also for phospholipid synthesis and the pyrimidine sugars necessary for protein glycosylation, which support the massive expansion in membrane biosynthesis to form daughter cells. This mechanism likely contributes to leflunomide's action as a DMARD in RA and other autoimmune diseases. This review is a summary of current in vivo and in vitro data, focussing primarily on the mechanism of action of leflunomide in RA.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an autoimmune disorder of unknown etiology, is characterized by chronic inflammation of synovial tissues and infiltration of the affected joints by blood-derived cells. This includes memory T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages and plasma cells, all of which show signs of activation. In most cases, this leads to progressive erosion of adjacent cartilage and underlying bone. Joint destruction is believed to be mediated mainly by cytokine-induced destructive enzymes, particularly members of the matrix metalloproteinase family. The consequences of this progressive disease are chronic/acute morbidity, reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, permanent disability and increased mortality Janossy et al., 1981, Cush and Lipsky, 1988, Muller-Ladner, 1996, Dudler and So, 1998.

The underlying cause of RA is not known and there is currently no consensus as to which principal regulatory cell represents an optimal therapeutic target. However, in light of the postulated autoimmune basis for RA, a number of reports have implicated a role for T lymphocytes in either the initiation or the persistence of the disease Goronzy and Weyand, 1995, Panayi, 1997, Moots, 1998. Recent observations in animal models support the key role of T cells in RA. Depletion of synovial T cells from SCID mice that have been transplanted with inflamed synovial tissue led to an immediate reduction of proinflammatory cytokines, monokines and tissue destructive metalloproteinases (Klimiuk et al., 1999). Other studies have shown that perturbations in T cell homeostasis and clonal outgrowth of CD4+ cells can lead to chronic, persistent synovitis in RA patients Rittner et al., 1997, Striebich et al., 1998, Wagner et al., 1998. Anti-T cell directed therapies have demonstrated to be partially efficacious (Matteson, 1997) and the resolution of pre-existing RA in patients developing AIDS also indicated an involvement of T cells (Calabrese et al., 1989). Most recently, B lymphocytes, in their role as secretors of arthrogenic immunoglobulins in T cell-initiated autoimmunity, have been shown to play a more important role in the pathogenesis of RA than had been previously suspected (Korganow et al., 1999). Despite the large number of activated lymphocytes in the synovial lesions, lymphokine production has been difficult to demonstrate. Conversely, macrophage-derived cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNFα, are readily detectable, indicating a possible role for macrophages in the pathogenesis of RA (Burmester et al., 1997). However, the activation of synovial macrophages may not require soluble mediators, since direct cell–cell contact between activated T cells and macrophages or fibroblasts is sufficient for activation and itself may be important in the progression of rheumatoid synovitis Lacraz et al., 1994, Chizzolini et al., 1997 It is therefore not clear whether macrophages or synovial fibroblasts themselves orchestrate this pathway, or whether they are merely acting as lymphocyte-directed mediators in RA.

Leflunomide (Arava™) is a novel immunoregulatory and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, structurally unrelated to other immunosuppressive agents. It is an isoxazole derivative and originated from an anti-arthritis drug development program at Hoechst (Heubach, 1977). Leflunomide, a non-cytotoxic inhibitor of the proliferation of mitogen-stimulated T- and B-lymphocytes in vitro, is effective in several rodent autoimmune disease models and prolongs tissue graft survival in animals (Graul and Castaner, 1998). More recently, leflunomide has shown clinical efficacy in multiple phase III studies in Europe and the US Dunn and Small, 1999, Smolen et al., 1999, Strand et al., 1999.

This article will review recent work on both the pharmacological effects as well as the mechanism of action of leflunomide, with the intention of providing a basis for understanding leflunomide's immunomodulatory activity, toxicity, drug interactions and the rationale for its use in single- and combination disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. Several mechanisms of action for leflunomide that have been proposed will be discussed in this review. The main focus, however, will be on the inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), a key enzyme in the de novo synthesis of UMP. This biochemical reaction is a critical step in the progression of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase in activated lymphocytes. Potential models for molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying leflunomide-induced immunomodulatory effects, which explain the selective nature of the drug to affect primarily activated, autoimmune lymphocytes, will be discussed.

Section snippets

Chemistry, pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of leflunomide

Leflunomide [N-(4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-5-methylisoxazol-4-carboxamide] (Fig. 1) is an isoxazole derivative with a molecular weight of 270.2 (C12H9F3N2O2). It is structurally and functionally unrelated to other known immunomodulatory drugs Bartlett, 1986, Brazelton and Morris, 1996.

After oral administration, leflunomide is nearly 100% metabolized and converted to its active open-ring metabolite, a malononitrilamide termed A77 1726 [3-cyano-3-hydroxy-N-(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)-crotonamide]

Clinical trials

Phase III double blind studies in Europe and in the US have shown that leflunomide (20 mg/day) provides statistically significant clinical benefit in comparison to placebo. The clinical benefits of leflunomide were comparable to methotrexate (7.5 to 15 mg/week) in the US trial (Strand et al., 1999) and to sulfasalazine in the European trial (Smolen et al., 1999), leading to approval of leflunomide (Arava™) by the US FDA and a recommendation to the European Commission by the European

Leflunomide and experimental autoimmune diseases in animals

Leflunomide has been reported to be effective in several autoimmune animal models. The drug has been shown to be active in auto-antibody driven autoimmune diseases such as myasthenia gravis (Vidic-Dankovic et al., 1995), experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (Bartlett et al., 1993) or autoantibody-mediated damage to the outer and inner areas of the kidneys in rats (glomeronephritis and tubulonephritis, respectively) (Ogawa et al., 1990). Leflunomide was also shown to be effective in rats with

Leflunomide modulates B cell-mediated immunity

In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that leflunomide inhibits the formation of specific antibodies. In several of these studies, B cells were more sensitive to leflunomide action than other cell types tested Lin and Waer, 1996, Lucien et al., 1996, Siemasko et al., 1996. Additionally, leflunomide has been shown to reduce the levels of auto-antibodies in animal models of autoimmune disease Bartlett et al., 1988, Glant et al., 1992, Vidic-Dankovic et al., 1995, allergy Eber et al., 1998, Jarman

Leflunomide modulates T cell-mediated immunity

T lymphocytes are the dominant cell population that infiltrates the synovial membrane in RA. One potential explanation for the therapeutic effects of leflunomide is the reduction in the numbers or reactivity of T cells involved in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases. This hypothesis is supported by data from leflunomide studies on the T cell-driven immune responses in animal models of autoimmunity, including collagen type II and other models of arthritis (Bartlett et al., 1996),

The molecular target(s) of leflunomide

Currently, at least two in vitro modes of drug action have been proposed for the active leflunomide metabolite, A77 1726: inhibition of various tyrosine kinases and reversible inhibition of DHODH, the fourth enzyme in the de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway. The immunomodulatory properties of leflunomide, as well as its reported therapeutic effects, have been attributed to apparently distinct, but not mutually exclusive, biochemical mechanisms.

Effects on various tyrosine kinases

At least five different and structurally divergent tyrosine kinases have so far been described as targets of A77 1726 inhibition (Table 1). Protein tyrosine kinases and/or general phosphorylation events play an essential role in antigen receptor and growth factor receptor signaling events. It is generally accepted that they are indispensable for signal transduction and subsequent induction of cell growth and/or differentiation Paul and Seder, 1994, Hunter, 1995. Based on this understanding,

Leflunomide inhibits pyrimidine de novo synthesis

To date, there is convincing evidence that the repression of de novo pyrimidine synthesis by inhibition of dihydroorotate-dehydrogenase (DHODH), the fourth enzyme in the pathway, is the predominant target of the mode of action of leflunomide Silva and Morris, 1997, Fox, 1998.

The presence of intact purine and pyrimidine synthesis pathways is critical for normal immune responses, as highlighted by the characterization of genetic diseases which are accompanied by severe T- and B-lymphocyte

Conclusion

Leflunomide is a novel drug with both anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory properties. Although different modes of action have been proposed, there is compelling evidence which suggests that the inhibition of DHODH by A77 1726 is of paramount importance to the mode of action of leflunomide. The inhibition of this key enzyme in the de novo synthesis pathway of pyrimidines will preferentially inactivate cells, which depend strongly on this pathway, including stimulated T and B-lymphocytes (Fig.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Vibeke Strand, Costakis Frangou and Robert Fox for their discussions and the help of Katherine Tiku, Lila Cleaver and Erick Berglund with the preparation of the manuscript. We would particularly like to acknowledge Dr. Robert Bartlett of the Hoechst Marion Roussel Laboratories in Wiesbaden, who contributed substantially in many ways to leflunomide research, and who recently passed away following a long illness.

References (145)

  • D.T. Hung et al.

    Understanding and controlling the cell cycle with natural products

    Chem. Biol.

    (1996)
  • T. Hunter

    Protein kinases and phosphatases: the yin and yang of protein phosphorylation and signaling

    Cell

    (1995)
  • S. Jackowski

    Cell cycle regulation of membrane phospholipid metabolism

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • G. Janossy et al.

    Rheumatoid arthritis: a disease of T-lymphocyte/macrophage immunoregulation

    Lancet

    (1981)
  • J.M. Karle et al.

    Effect of plasma concentrations of uridine on pyrimidine biosynthesis in cultured L1210 cells

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1984)
  • G.C. Katsafanas et al.

    Inhibition of vaccinia virus replication by N-(phosphonoacetyl)-l-aspartate: differential effects on viral gene expression result from a reduced pyrimidine nucleotide pool

    Virology

    (1997)
  • S.M. Kharbanda et al.

    Effects of tiazofurin on guanine nucleotide binding regulatory proteins in HL-60 cells

    Blood

    (1990)
  • P.A. Klimiuk et al.

    Production of cytokines and metalloproteinases in rheumatoid synovitis is T cell dependent

    Clin. Immunol.

    (1999)
  • W. Knecht et al.

    Species-related inhibition of human and rat dihydroorotate dehydrogenase by immunosuppressive isoxazol and cinchoninic acid derivatives

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1998)
  • A.S. Korganow et al.

    From systemic T cell self-reactivity to organ-specific autoimmune disease via immunoglobulins

    Immunity

    (1999)
  • V. Kouskoff et al.

    Organ-specific disease provoked by systemic autoimmunity

    Cell

    (1996)
  • S. Lacraz et al.

    Direct contact between T lymphocytes and monocytes is a major pathway for induction of metalloproteinase expression

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1994)
  • A.J. Levine

    p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division

    Cell

    (1997)
  • S. Mahajan et al.

    Rational design and synthesis of a novel anti-leukemic agent targeting Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) LFM-A13 [alpha-cyano-beta-hydroxy-beta-methyl-N-(2, 5-dibromophenyl)propenamide]

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • Y.M. Marijnen et al.

    Studies on the incorporation of precursors into purine and pyrimidine nucleotides via ‘de novo’ and ‘salvage’ pathways in normal lymphocytes and lymphoblastic cell-line cells

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta.

    (1989)
  • T. Mattar et al.

    Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity by leflunomide

    FEBS Lett.

    (1993)
  • G. Morford et al.

    Appearance of CAD activity, the rate-limiting enzyme for pyrimidine biosynthesis, as B cells progress into and through the G1 stage of the cell cycle

    Cell. Immunol.

    (1994)
  • R.V. Nair et al.

    Inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro by leflunomide, a new immunosuppressant, is antagonized by uridine

    Immunol. Lett.

    (1995)
  • P.J. O'Dwyer

    The role of low-dose PALA in biochemical modulation

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1990)
  • N. Osherov et al.

    Selective inhibition of the epidermal growth factor and HER2/neu receptors by tyrphostins

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1993)
  • W.E. Paul et al.

    Lymphocyte responses and cytokines

    Cell

    (1994)
  • J.C. Paulson

    Glycoproteins: what are the sugar chains for?

    Trends Biochem Sci.

    (1989)
  • M.L. Agarwal et al.

    A p53-dependent S-phase checkpoint helps to protect cells from DNA damage in response to starvation for pyrimidine nucleotides

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1998)
  • A.C. Allison et al.

    Inhibitors of de novo purine and pyrimidine synthesis as immunosuppressive drugs

    Transplant. Proc.

    (1993)
  • A.C. Allison et al.

    Mycophenolic acid and brequinar, inhibitors of purine and pyrimidine synthesis, block the glycosylation of adhesion molecules

    Transplant. Proc.

    (1993)
  • E.A. Antoniou et al.

    Immunosuppressive effect of combination schedules of brequinar with leflunomide or tacrolimus on rat cardiac allotransplantation

    Microsurgery

    (1999)
  • R.R. Bartlett et al.

    Development of autoimmunity in MRL/lpr mice and the effects of drugs on this murine disease

    Scand. J. Rheumatol., Suppl.

    (1988)
  • R.R. Bartlett et al.

    Effects of leflunomide on immune responses and models of inflammation

    Springer Semin. Immunopathol.

    (1993)
  • R.R. Bartlett et al.

    Leflunomide, an immunorestoring drug for the therapy of autoimmune disorders, especially rheumatoid arthritis

    Transplant. Proc.

    (1996)
  • M.J. Berridge et al.

    Inositol phosphates and cell signalling

    Nature

    (1989)
  • J.M. Bruneau et al.

    Purification of human dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase and its inhibition by A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide

    Biochem. J.

    (1998)
  • G.R. Burmester et al.

    Mononuclear phagocytes and rheumatoid synovitis. Mastermind or workhorse in arthritis?

    Arthritis Rheum.

    (1997)
  • L.H. Calabrese et al.

    Rheumatoid arthritis complicated by infection with the human immunodeficiency virus and the development of Sjogren's syndrome

    Arthritis Rheum.

    (1989)
  • W.W. Cao et al.

    Mechanism of the antiproliferative action of leflunomide. A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide, does not block T-cell receptor-mediated signal transduction but its antiproliferative effects are antagonized by pyrimidine nucleosides

    J. Heart Lung Transplant.

    (1995)
  • W.W. Cao et al.

    A novel mechanism of action of the immunomodulatory drug, leflunomide: augmentation of the immunosuppressive cytokine, TGF-beta 1, and suppression of the immunostimulatory cytokine IL-2

    Transplant. Proc.

    (1996)
  • H.M. Cherwinski et al.

    The immunosuppressant leflunomide inhibits lymphocyte progression through cell cycle by a novel mechanism

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1995)
  • H.M. Cherwinski et al.

    The immunosuppressant leflunomide inhibits lymphocyte proliferation by inhibiting pyrimidine biosynthesis

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1995)
  • C. Chizzolini et al.

    Human Th1 cells preferentially induce interleukin (IL)-1beta while Th2 cells induce IL-1 receptor antagonist production upon cell/cell contact with monocytes

    Eur. J. Immunol.

    (1997)
  • S.L. Constant et al.

    Induction of Th1 and Th2 CD4+T cell responses: the alternative approaches

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (1997)
  • J.J. Cush et al.

    Phenotypic analysis of synovial tissue and peripheral blood lymphocytes isolated from patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Rheum.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (246)

    • Anti-inflammatory Therapy for Sarcoidosis

      2024, Clinics in Chest Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text