Article
Rasch analysis for outcomes measures: some methodological considerations

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80070-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the four approaches to applying Rasch analysis to ordinal, repeated measures: (1) to perform separate Rasch analyses; (2) to perform a single analysis by treating the subjects measured on different occasions as distinct ones; (3) to perform a single analysis by treating items used on different occasions as distinct ones; and (4) to construct a 3-facet model by adding occasions as the third facet.

Design:

Various Rasch and 3-facet models applied to retrospective, cohort data.

Setting:

A stroke program at a rehabilitation hospital.

Patients:

99 of the 107 consecutive patients admitted between March and October, 1990, average age 69 years, 40% of whom were women, with an average stay of 54 days.

Intervention:

Medical inpatient rehabilitation.

Main Outcome Measure:

The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), administered within 1 week of admission and discharge, and approximately 6 weeks after discharge.

Results:

The four approaches resulted in various occasion-specific and generalized measures of item difficulty, patient ability, and occasion severity. Although these measures turned out to be congruent with each other as they should, they generated different sources of information needed for formative and summative evaluation of health care outcomes. All four approaches were found to be useful, although each had its own limitations. A four-step strategy based on these approaches was therefore designed and recommended.

Conclusion:

Rasch analysis of ordinal, repeated measures poses a special challenge to those interested in health care outcomes. A multi-method strategy incorporating various approaches is therefore needed to optimize its use in health care research.

References (24)

  • GrangerCV et al.

    Performance profiles of the functional independence measure

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (1993)
  • PuderbaughJK et al.

    Assessment of motor and process skills in normal young children with dyspraxia

    Occup Ther J Res

    (1992)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Longitudinal stability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity

      2008, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    • Rasch analysis of three versions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire

      2008, Manual Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      DIF by time (the first and second administrations of the test) was tested so that the responses at the two administrations could be pooled, provided no DIF by time was evident.( Chang and Chan, 1995) For the DIF analysis the sample is divided into three equal-sized groups or “class intervals” classifying persons of low, medium and high ability. Uniform DIF is exhibited when there is a consistent deviation of observed from expected responses across all class intervals.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text