The consensus workshops for the detection of autoantibodies to intracellular antigens in rheumatic diseases

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(91)90369-QGet rights and content

Abstract

In 1988 and in 1989 consensus workshops were organized in order to define the interlaboratory concordance in detecting autoantibody specificities in selected sera from patients with rheumatoid disorders and to determine the possible causes of discrepancies. In total 20 sera were tested for the presence of antibodies against nRNP, Sm, Ro (SS-A), La (SS-B), Scl-70, centromeric antigens, ribosomal RNP and Jo-1. The methods used for detection by the 28 European laboratories who participated included immunofluorescence, counter-immunoelectrophoresis, immunodiffusion, immunoblotting and ELISA.

The results showed that only a combination of two or more techniques was able to detect all specificities with an adequate efficiency. Recommendations to improve the efficiency of autoantibody detection and to standardize laboratory protocols are given.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (80)

  • Comparison of two extractable nuclear antigen testing algorithms: ALBIA versus ELISA/line immunoassay

    2016, Pathology
    Citation Excerpt :

    There are several methods of ENA testing including counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and line immunoassay (LIA), each with their own advantages and disadvantages in cost, sensitivity, specificity and labour requirement/capacity for automation. Unfortunately, there is no one ideal test that is both highly sensitive and highly specific for anti-ENA antibodies,14 and many laboratories in Australia traditionally follow The European Consensus Workshop's recommendation that ENA testing should be performed by two or more methods.15 In practice, most laboratories participating in the Royal College of Pathologists Quality Assurance Programs (RCPA QAP) have chosen to use an ELISA-based screening method for its high sensitivity, simplicity, convenience, and rapid turnaround time, while using a more specific test (e.g., CIEP or LIA) for confirmation (50/86 labs screen with ELISA and confirm with a second method, e.g., ELISA/LIA/FEIA/CIEP; source, RCPA QAP 2015 reports).14

  • Laboratory Investigations

    2015, Textbook of Pediatric Rheumatology
  • Autoimmune Disease

    2013, The Immunoassay Handbook: Theory and Applications of Ligand Binding, ELISA and Related Techniques
  • Autoimmune Disease

    2013, The Immunoassay Handbook
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text