Abstract
Background: Evidence about the impact of routine feedback of patient-reported outcomes is contradictory, and there is limited information regarding its use in the routine management of cataract patients. Methods: The VF-14 Index was used to assess the visual function of 833 consecutive cataract patients, attending 19 ophthalmologists from public and private hospitals and primary care practices in Spain, in 1999–2000. In this before/after trial, the intervention included (1) an educational session, and (2) the provision of the VF-14 scores of all subsequent patients to the ophthalmologist. Mixed effects linear and logistic models were constructed to assess the effect on the process (correlation between patients’ and physicians’ assessments of visual function, appropriateness of surgery recommendation) and the outcome of care (satisfaction). Results: The adjusted regression coefficient for the VF-14 score significantly increased after the intervention as a predictor of the ophthalmologist’s assessment of visual function (β coefficient: control 0.10 vs. intervention 0.35, p < 0.05). The intervention did not increase the probability of an appropriate medical decision (OR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.42; 2,69) and it did not change patient satisfaction with care. Conclusions: Routine provision of education and feedback on the patient’s VF-14 Index score significantly increases agreement between patients’ and physicians’ assessments of functional capacity. The lack of a beneficial effect on management or outcome suggests the need for a more intense intervention to change medical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
confidence interval
- HRQL:
-
health related quality of life
- OR:
-
odds ratio
- OVF:
-
ophthalmologist’s assessment of the patient’s visual function
- SD:
-
standard deviation
- VF-14:
-
Visual Function Index VF-14
References
Vision 2020. The global initiative. Fact Sheet 213. WHO. 2000
A Reidy DC Minassian G. Vafidis et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePrevalence of serious eye disease and visual impairment in a North London population: Population based, cross sectional study Br Med J. 316 1643–1646
C Klaver R Wolfs JR. Vingerling et al. (1998) ArticleTitleAge-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population. The Rotterdam Study Arch Ophtalmol. 116 653–658
J Rodriguez R Sanchez B. Muñoz et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCauses of blindness and visual impairment in a population-based sample of US: Hispanics Ophthalmology. 109 737–743 Occurrence Handle11927431
MR VanNewkirk L Weih CA. McCarty et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCauses of incident visual impairment: The Blue Mountains eye study Arch Ophtalmol. 120 613–619
M Woodcock S Shah RJ. Smith (2004) ArticleTitleRecent advances in customising cataract surgery Br Med J. 328 92–6
DA Laidlaw RA Harrad CD. Hopper et al. (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of effectiveness of second eye cataract surgery Lancet 352 IssueID9132 925–929 Occurrence Handle9752814
M Espallargues J. Alonso (1998) ArticleTitleEffectiveness of cataract surgery in Barcelona, Spain site results of an international study J Clin Epidemiol. 51 IssueID10 843–852 Occurrence Handle9762877
HR. Taylor (2000) ArticleTitleCataract: How much surgery do we have to do? Br J Ophthalmol 84 1–2 Occurrence Handle10611088
Cataract Management Guideline Panel. Cataract in Adults. Management of functional impairment. Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 4. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR pub no 93–0542. 1993
The Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines Working Group. Guideline for Surgical & Non-Surgical Management of Cataract in the Otherwise Healthy Adult Eye. Edmonton, AB, Canada: The Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines Program, 2002
American Academy of Ophthalmology, Anterior Segment Panel. Cataract in the adult eye. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO), 2001; 62
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Day case cataract surgery. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN); 2001, Aug., 20 p. (SIGN publication; no. 53)
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Cataract Surgery Guidelines. [on-line] 2001. http://www.rcophth.ac.uk/ publications/guidelines/cataract_surgery.html
EP Steinberg JM Tielsch O. Schein et al. (1994) ArticleTitleThe VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 112 630–638 Occurrence Handle8185520
CM Mangione RS Phillips JM. Seddon et al. (1992) ArticleTitleDevelopment of the activities of daily vision scale. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 30 1111–1126 Occurrence Handle1453816
M Espallargues JM Valderas J. Alonso (2000) ArticleTitleProvision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals A systematic review of its impact Med Care. 38 IssueID2 175–186 Occurrence Handle10659691
J Greenhalgh K. Meadows (1999) ArticleTitleThe effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review J Eval Clin Pract. 5 IssueID4 401–416 Occurrence Handle10579704
SM Gilbody AO House T. Sheldon (2002) ArticleTitleRoutine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome – a systematic review Psychol Med. 32 IssueID8 1345–1356 Occurrence Handle12455933
E. Lydick (2000) ArticleTitleApproaches to the interpretation of quality of life scales Med Care. 38 IssueIDSuppl 9 II180–II183 Occurrence Handle10982105
JM Valderas J Alonso L. Prieto et al. (1999) ArticleTitleContent-based interpretation aids for health-related quality of life measures in clinical practice. An example for the visual function index VF-14 Qual Life Res 2004 IssueID13 35–44
TD Cook DT. Campbell (1979) Quasiexperimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings Houghton Mifflin Co Boston, MA.
SD Cassard DL Patrick AM. Damiano et al. (1995) ArticleTitleReproducibility and responsiveness of the VF-14. Arch Ophthalmol. 113 1508–1513 Occurrence Handle7487617
J Alonso M Espallargues T. Folmer-Andersen et al. (1997) ArticleTitleInternational applicability of the VF-14. An index of visual function in patients with cataracts. Ophthalmology 104 IssueID5 799–807 Occurrence Handle9160026
Prieto L, Comas M, Vilagut G (1999) Turbo Pascal Measurement Program Rasch Measurement Transactions 12: 4, p. 672
AR Davies JE. Ware (1991) GHAA’s Consumer Satisfaction Survey and User’s Manual EditionNumber2 Group Health Association America Inc. Washington, DC
PP Lee CJ Kamberg LH. Hilborne et al. (1993) Cataract Surgery: A literature review and ratings of appropriateness and cruciality RAND Santa Monica, CA
JNK Rao AJ. Scott (1984) ArticleTitleOn chi-squared tests for multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data Ann Stat. 12 46–60
Eltinge JL, Sribney WM. Estimates of linear combinations and hypothesis tests for survey data. Stata Technical Bulletin 1996; 31: 31–42. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, Vol. 6, 246–259
JC Pinheiro DM. Bates (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S_PLUS., Statistics and Computing Series Springer-Verlag New York.
DG Kleinbaum LL Kupper KE. Muller (1988) Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods Duxbury Press Belmont, CA.
L Prieto R Lamarca A. Casado (1998) ArticleTitleAssessment of the reliability of clinical findings: The intraclass correlation coefficient Med Clin (Barc). 110 IssueID4 142–145
JC Nunnally IH. Bernstein (1994) Psychometric Theory. EditionNumber3 McGraw-Hill New York
R Development Core Team (2003). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051-00-3, http://www.R-project.org
StataCorp. (2003) Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0 StataCorp LP College Station, TX
Swinskow TDV. Statistics at Square One. London: British Medical Association, 1996
AD Oxman MA Thomson DA Davis RB. Haynes (1995) ArticleTitleNo magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice Can Med Assoc J. 153 1423–1431
G Velikova L Booth AB. Smith et al. (2004) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial J Clin Oncol. 22 IssueID4 714–724 Occurrence Handle14966096
Temps mitjà de resolució i llistes d’espera per Regions Sanitàries. Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Salut. Servei Català de la Salut. http://www.10gencat.net/pls/catsalut/cawpk800.Recerca_Regions
Working Party of the Standing Committee of the Hospitals of the European Union (HOPE) on management of waiting lists. Measuring and comparing waiting lists: A study in␣four European countries. Third report. Brussels, April 18, 2004. http://www.hope.be/07publi/fr_tot.htm; (accessed December 24th 2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors were done this work for the Systematic Use of Quality of Life Measures in the Clinical Practice Working Group
The Systematic Use of Quality of Life Measures in the Clinical Practice Working Group are: Alonso J, Castells X, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Prieto L, Valderas JM.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valderas, J.M., Rue, M., Guyatt, G. et al. The impact of the VF-14 index, a perceived visual function measure, in the routine management of cataract patients. Qual Life Res 14, 1743–1753 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1745-y
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-1745-y