Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IACUS study group

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study way to assess the value of contrast enhanced gray-scale ultrasound (CEUS) in detection of vascularity in joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a multicenter study of the International Arthritis Contrast Ultrasound (IACUS) study group. We assessed 113 joints in 113 patients (44 men, 69 women; mean age 51±14 years) with clinical diagnosis of RA. Gray-scale ultrasound (US), power Doppler US (PDUS) and CEUS, using a low mechanical index US technique, was performed. CEUS was done by bolus administration of the contrast agent SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) with a dosage of 4.8-ml SonoVue flushed with 10 ml saline. Detection of joint vascularity was performed for differentiation of active synovitis from inactive intra-articular thickening (synovitis/effusion). With the use of US and PDUS, active synovitis could be differentiated from inactive intra-articular thickening in 68/113 joints (60.1%), whereas CEUS enabled differentiation in 110/113 (97.3%) joints (p<0.0001). Thickness measurement of active synovitis was significantly improved after contrast administration (p=0.008). In conclusion, CEUS improves the differentiation of active synovitis from inactive intra-articular thickening. Since CEUS has shown an ability to improve assessment of vascularized synovial proliferation in RA affected joints, this technique may have further potential in monitoring therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alarcon G (1995) Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 21:589–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, Radke S, Faehdrich TP, Gohlke F (2001) Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 44:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Doria AS, Kiss MH, Lotito AP, Molnar LJ, de Castro CC, Medeiros CC, Cerri GG (2001) Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: evaluation with contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol 31:524–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carotti M, Salaffi F, Manganelli P, Salera D, Simonetti B, Grassi W (2002) Power Doppler sonography in the assessment of synovial tissue of the knee joint in rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary experience. Ann Rheum Dis 61:877–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klauser A, Frauscher F, Schirmer M, Halpern E, Pallwein L, Herold M, Helweg G, ZurNedden D (2002) The value of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound in the detection of vascularization of finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 46:647–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Magarelli N, Guglielmi G, Di Matteo L, Tartaro A, Mattei PA, Bonomo L (2001) Diagnostic utility of an echo-contrast agent in patients with synovitis using power Doppler ultrasound: a preliminary study with comparison to contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 11:1039–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. FitzGerald O, Bresnihan B (1995) Synovial membrane cellularity and vascularity. Ann Rheum Dis 54:511–515

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koch AE (1998) Angiogenesis: implications for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 41:951–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor PC (2003) The value of sensitive imaging modalities in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 5:210–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, Healey LA, Kaplan SR, Liang MH, Luthra HS (1988) The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 31:315–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt WA, Volker L, Zacher J, Schlafke M, Ruhnke M, Gromnica-Ihle E (2000) Colour Doppler ultrasonography to detect pannus in knee joint synovitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 18:439–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg BB, Liu JB, Forsberg F (1994) Ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 20:319–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blomley MJK, Cooke JC, Unger EC, Monaghan MJ, Cosgrove DO (2001) Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound. BMJ 322:1222–1225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Forsberg F, Ro RJ, Potoczek M, Liu JB, Merritt CR, James KM, Dicker AP, Nazarian LN (2004) Assessment of angiogenesis: implications for ultrasound imaging. Ultrasonics 42:325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hau M, Kneitz C, Tony H-P, Keberle M, Jahns R, Jenett M (2002) High resolution ultrasound detects a decrease in pannus vascularisation of small finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving treatment with soluble tumour necrosis factor alpha receptor (etanercept). Ann Rheum Dis 61:55–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, Kristoffersen H, Rogind H, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Bliddal H (2003) Effects of treatment with etanercept (Enbrel, TNFR:Fc) on rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 62:178–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, Gideon P, Klarlund M, Jensen KE, Lorenzen I (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 42:918–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nell VP, Machold KP, Eberl G, Stamm TA, Uffmann M, Smolen JS (2004) Benefit of very early referral and very early therapy with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43:906–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Newman JS, Laing TJ, McCarthy CJ, Adler RS (1996) Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of therapeutic response—preliminary observations. Radiology 198:582–584

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M (2003) Contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Radiol 13:163–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wamser G, Bohndorf K, Vollert K, Bucklein W, Schalm J (2003) Power Doppler sonography with and without echo-enhancing contrast agent and contrast-enhanced MRI for the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder joint: differentiation between synovitis and joint effusion. Skelet Radiol 32:351–359

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Klauser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klauser, A., Demharter, J., De Marchi, A. et al. Contrast enhanced gray-scale sonography in assessment of joint vascularity in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the IACUS study group. Eur Radiol 15, 2404–2410 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2884-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2884-9

Keywords

Navigation