Skip to main content
Log in

Age-Related cortical bone loss at the metacarpal

  • Comments
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to evaluate in vivo the entity of endosteal and periosteal changes with age in the two sexes, and their relative contribution to age-related cortical bone loss, we undertook a cross-sectional study on a population of normal Caucasian subjects. The group included 189 women and 107 men who were studied by photodensitometry and radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal bone, derived from the same standard hand X-ray. Of the subjects, 134 were 65 years of age or older (75 women and 59 men). Metacarpal bone mineral density (BMD) correlated with age in both sexes, with an annual bone loss rate of 0.5% in women and 0.15% in men. In the over 65 group, correlation was significant only in women, who underwent an acceleration in the rate of bone loss (1 % per year). Marrow cavity width (M), cortical index at the second metacarpal shaft (MI) and external width (W) all correlated with age in both sexes, although generally better in the female than in the male sex. M almost doubled from the fourth to the ninth decade in women and increased 50% in men. In the same age interval, MI showed an annual decrease of 0.49% in females and 0.33% in males. In the over 65 group, cortical thinning rate was significant in women (0.39% per annum) but not in men (0.14% per annum), whereas correlation of W was not significant in either sex. Finally, MI correlated with BMD in the whole study population and in the over 65, with a female prevalence in correlation strength maintained throughout life. The following conclusions can be derived for metacarpal aging: (1) an acceleration in cortical bone loss occurs in females after age 65; (2) age-related growth in periosteal diameter, although significant in the whole population, is negligible in the elderly of both sexes; (3) age-related cortical bone loss is generally more dependent on cortical thinning in women than in men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maggio D, Pacifici R, Cherubini A, Aisa MC, Santucci C, Cucinotta D, Senin U (1995) Appendicular cortical bone loss after age 65: sex-dependent event? Calcif Tissue Int 56:410–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yates AJ, Ross PD, Lydick E, Epstein RS (1995) Radiographic absorptiometry in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Am J Med 98(suppl 2A):41S-47S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trouerbach WT, Birkenhager JC, Schmitz PIM, Van Hemert AM, Van Saase JLCM, Collette HJA, Zwamborn AW (1988) A cross-sectional study of age-related loss of mineral content of phalangeal bone in men and women. Skeletal Radiol 17: 338–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang So, Hagiwara S, Engelke K, Dhillon MS, Guglielmi G, Bendavid EJ, Soejima O, Nelson DL, Genant HK (1994) Radiographic absorptiometry for bone mineral measurement of the phalanges: precision and accuracy study. Radiology 192: 857–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cosman F, Herrington B, Himmelstein S, Lindsay R (1991) Radiographic absorptiometry: a simple method for determination of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int 2:34–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsumoto C, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Imose K, Inoue T (1994) Metacarpal bone mass in normal and osteoporotic Japanese women using computed x-ray densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 55:324–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kleerekoper M, Nelson DA, Flynn MJ, Pawluszka AS, Jacobsen G, Peterson EL (1994) Comparison of radiographic absorptiometry with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in normal older white and black women. J Bone Miner Res 9:1745–1749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Derisquebourg T, Dubois P, Devogelaer JP, Meys E, Dequesnoy B, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes C, Delcambre B, Marchandise X (1994) Automated computerized radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine. Calcif Tissue Int 54:461–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maggio D, Agostinelli D, Aisa MC, Senin U (1995) Radiogrammetry vs DEXA in the diagnosis of senile osteoporosis. Bone 16(suppl 1):153S

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meema HE, Meema S (1981) Radiogrammetry. In: Cohn S (ed) Noninvasive measurements of bone mass and their clinical applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 5–50

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nordin BEC (1984) Metabolic bone and stone disease. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 1–70

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laval-Jeantet AM, Bergot C, Carroll R, Garcia-Schaefer (1983) Cortical bone senescence and mineral bone density of the humerus. Calcif Tissue Int 35:268–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson DD (1980) Age changes in bone mineralization, cortical thickness, and haversian canal area. Calcif Tissue Int 31:5–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barth RW, Williams JL, Kaplan FS (1992) Osteon morphometry in females with femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Rel Res 283:178–186

    Google Scholar 

  15. Einhorn TA (1992) Bone strength: the bottom line. Calcif Tissue Int 51:333–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brockstedt H, Kassem M, Eriksen EF, Mosekilde L, Melsen F (1993) Age-and sex-related changes in iliac cortical bone mass and remodeling. Bone 14:681–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Garn SM, Rohmann CG, Wagner B, Oscole W (1967) Continuing bone growth throughout life: a general phenomenon. Am J Phys Anthropol 26:313–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adami S, Gatti D, Rossini M, Adamoli A, James G, Girardello S, Zamberlan N (1992) The radiological assessment of vertebral osteoporosis. Bone 13:S33-S36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adami S, Gatti D, Zamberlan N, Rossini M (1992) Methodological aspects in the assessment of involutional osteopenia. Proc Symp Epidemiol Osteoporosis, Italy. XI ICCRH, Florence, Italy, pp 31–34

  20. Meema HE, Meindok H (1992) Advantages of peripheral radiogrammetry over dual photon absorptiometry of the spine in the assessment of prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in women. J Bone Miner Res 7:897–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1982) Subperiosteal expansion and cortical remodeling of the human femur and tibia with aging. Science 217:945–948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Steiger P, Cummings SR, Black DM, Spencer NE, Genant HK (1992) Age-related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65. J Bone Miner Res 7:625–632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, McClung MR, Deftos LJ, Sexton G (1990) The rate of bone mineral loss in normal men and the effects of calcium and cholecalciferol supplementation. Ann Intern Med 112:29–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Barrett-Connor EL, Edelstein SL (1994) Sex differences in bone mineral density in 1653 men and women in the sixth through tenth decades of life: the Rancho Bernardo study. J Bone Miner Res 9:1333–1338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chapuy MC, Arlot ME, Duboeuf F, Brun J, Crouzet B, Arnaud S, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ (1992) Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in elderly women. N Engl J Med 327:1637–1642

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis JW, Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Maclean CJ, Vogel JM (1989) Comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements of age-related changes in bone mineral content. J Bone Miner Res 4:351–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Garn SM, Feutz E, Colbert C, Wagner B (1966) Comparison of cortical thickness and radiographic microdensitometry in the measurement of bone loss. In: Progress in development of methods in bone densitometry, NASA SP-64. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. Garn SM (1970) The earlier gain and the later loss of cortical bone. In: Charles C Thomas (ed) Nutritional perspective. Springfield, IL, pp 1–146

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garn SM, Frisancho AR, Sandusky ST, McCann MB (1972) Confirmation of the sex difference in continuing subperiosteal apposition. Am J Phys Anthropol 36:377–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Garn SM, Sullivan TV, Decker SA, Larkin FA, Hawthorne VM (1992) Continuing bone expansion and increasing bone loss over a two-decade period in men and women from a total community sample. Am J Hum Biol 4:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bouxsein ML, Myburgh KH, Van der Meulen MC, Lindenberger E, Marcus R (1994) Age-related differences in crosssectional geometry of the forearm bones in healthy women. Calcif Tissue Int 54:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fox KM, Kimura S, Powell-Threets K, Plato CC (1995) Radial and ulnar cortical thickness of the second metacarpal. J Bone Miner Res 10:1930–1934

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maggio, D., Pacifici, R., Cherubini, A. et al. Age-Related cortical bone loss at the metacarpal. Calcif Tissue Int 60, 94–97 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900193

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900193

Key words

Navigation