Table 2.

Correlation of the different models with clinical and histologic variables

Median (IQR)Model 1Model 2Model 3Model 4Model 5Model 6Model 7Model 8
01
Predicting a diagnosis of GCA02 (1–3)25 (57%)19 (43%)3 (2–4.2)1 (0.4–2.3)2.7 (1.9–3.4)1 (0.4–1.8)0 (0–1.4)1.3 (0.6–2.7)
13 (1–5)60 (44%)75 (56%)3.3 (1.8–6.2)2.1 (0.8–4.4)3.2 (2.1–3.7)1.6 (0.7–2.3)2 (1.2–2.8)1 (0–1.8)
p 0.028 0.210.52 <0.001 0.47 0.003 <0.001 0.35
TAB diagnostic for GCA02 (1–3.5)31 (61%)20 (39%)2.5 (1.2–3.4)1 (0.6–2.4)2.1 (1.2–3.5)1.2 (0.4–1.7)1.4 (1–2)0.3 (0–2.2)
13 (2–5)24 (32%)52 (68%)5 (2.9–7.5)2.8 (1.8–6)3.5 (2.7–4)1.9 (1.4–2.5)2.2 (1.4–3)1.1 (0.2–1.6)
p <0.001 0.002 0.007 <0.001 0.064 <0.001 0.008 0.90
Transmural infiltrate02 (1–3.3)34 (61%)22 (39%)2 (1.3–3.4)1.1 (0.6–2.4)1.9 (1.1–3.3)1.1 (0.4–1.7)1.4 (1.1–2)0.2 (0–2.2)
13 (2–4)6 (23%)20 (77%)2.8 (1.6–3.2)2.6 (1.5–3.6)2.8 (2.2–3.1)1.9 (1.5–2.3)1.7 (1.2–2.5)0.8 (0.2–1.2)
p 0.011 0.003 0.96 0.003 0.51 0.002 0.290.96
  • Comparison between satisfying (1) or not satisfying (0) the considered variable.